ipl-logo

Kiefel CJ And The High Court Of Australia

1234 Words5 Pages

The dissenting judgement of Kiefel CJ and the majority judgement of Bell J in the High Court of Australia decision in Love v Commonwealth (2020) 94 ALJR 198, 204–212 [1]– [47], 212–218 [49]–[82] prompts significant discussion of the principal legal issue in interpreting section 51(xix) of the term “aliens” in the Australian Constitution and its implications for Indigenous peoples. Bell J, as part of the majority, held that the Parliament did not have the power to treat an Aboriginal person as an “alien” and the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) could not apply to Aboriginal Australians under section 51(xix); this was an exception deemed appropriate regarding the common law recognition of the native law title. In contrast, Kiefel CJ dissented that Aboriginal …show more content…

To compare judgements, the case of Love v Commonwealth will firstly be summarised. Love v Commonwealth is significant in addressing the principal legal issue of the interpretation of “aliens” in section 51 (xix) of the Australian constitution. This issue was raised by the High Court, as the plaintiffs, Brendan Thoms and Daniel Love, were of Indigenous ancestry but were non-citizens who were at risk of being deported as “aliens” due to their criminal sentence and cancellation of their visas. The plaintiffs submitted that as Aboriginal Australians, their deep connection to Australia recognised by common law means that they cannot be recognised as “aliens”, thus arguing that deportation contradicted their native title rights (Mabo v Queensland (No 2)). In contrast, the Commonwealth submitted they had the authority under s51 (xix) to determine who would be alien and thus asserted the possibility that the plaintiffs could be deported as they lacked citizenship under the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth). Unlike Kiefel CJ, Bell J held that the plaintiffs of Aboriginal Australian descent should not be considered as “aliens” within the meaning of section 51 (xix) of the Australian …show more content…

Kiefel CJ held that the plaintiffs’ argument of the common law in recognizing traditional laws and customs was misleading; Kiefel CJ clarifies that the common law only recognises native title and does not determine a person’s legal status in relation to the Australian polity. Furthermore, in constitutional terms, “belonging” refers to the formal legal relationship between a person and the community or body politic, not just a sense of connection to land. Kiefel CJ recognizes the constitutional implication that if the plaintiffs seek to imply this new principle of granting certain rights to Aboriginal persons regardless of their citizenship status, this would raise issues of race and sovereignty. Furthermore, this is not supported by existing common law or constitutional provisions, which raises concerns about judicial subjectivity. This demonstrates that Kiefel CJ’s approach considers the broader implications of interpreting the

Show More
Related

How Did Eddie Mabo Change Australia

902 Words | 4 Pages

The Mabo decision changed the legal, political and social relationships between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. In recognising the traditional rights of Murray Islanders it changed Australia forever. The Mabo decision opened the doors for other indigenous people and groups to be able to claim ownership of land. They were required to prove that they had continuous connection to the land and maintained their traditional associating with it. The 'native title ' is the recognition by law that some aboriginal and torres strait islander people have rights to certain land due to their traditional laws and customs.

Read More

The Pivotal Case Of Mabo V. Queensland (No. 2)

1505 Words | 7 Pages

The pivotal case of Mabo v Queensland [No.2] constitutes a significant shift in Australian law, authorising a new version of history that recognises Indigenous land rights and uses historical evidence to justify legal decisions. Utilising law and history reshaped legal history and redefined legal doctrines, notably with Indigenous land rights and how it overturned the doctrine of terra nullius. The 'Mabo' case, decided in 1992 by the High Court of Australia, challenged this doctrine by affirming Indigenous land rights, specifically on Eddie Mabo's claim to Murray Island. The essay ventures into the breakdown of the case decision. Looking at how it utilised historical evidence, its connection to legal precedent and sovereignty, and its reshaping

Read More

B Pulsey & Anor V State Of B Impulsey

1503 Words | 7 Pages

LAWS1052 Extended Case Note Assignment Bulsey & Anor v State of Queensland [2015] QCA 187 (6 October 2015) (“Bulsey”) I. Introduction Bulsey represents the ongoing struggle of Indigenous Australians’ rights to be recognised and the importance of preventing arbitrary use of power. It highlights the potential for police to abuse their powers of arrest and emphasises that this concern is especially significant for Aborigines. Further, Bulsey deliberates intentional torts and in particular, personal injury damages and aggravated damages.

Read More

The Significance Of The 1992 Mabo High Court Case

702 Words | 3 Pages

The 1992 Mabo High Court case represents one of the most profound cases in Australian history leading to the turning point of Reconciliation for Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders. As a result of this decision, it changed the legislation of the indigenous Australians introducing land rights and impacted the indigenous Australians society rights and freedom as a more desirable outcome in the movement towards Reconciliation. The 1992 Mabo court case was a pivotal turning point in the progressive Reconciliation in Australia. It paved the pathway for Indigenous land rights and confronted the state of Queensland and Australian commonwealth to regain their freedom and equality.

Read More

What Is The Howard Government's Policy Of Practical Reconciliation

1234 Words | 5 Pages

The Howard government’s policy of “practical reconciliation” has been a failure on two substantial levels which resulted in failing to benefit Indigenous Aboriginals. First the policy ignores the significance of “symbolic reconciliation” which provides justice to Indigenous people. Second, the policy, although set out to improve the socio economic disadvantage experienced by Indigenous Australians, did not actually succeed. The election of John Howard’s government in 1996 marked the beginning of a discursive shift away from the view of social justice which has been a target pursued by the Council of Aboriginal Reconciliation and supported by the previous Labor government. The new Howard government refused to accept the approach of previous

Read More

Terra Nullius In Australia

301 Words | 2 Pages

Prior to the European settlement of Australia (1788), indigenous Australians inhabited the continent and had recognised laws within their clans. However, as documented in the case of the Yirrkala community, due to the notorious laws being unwritten, the doctrine of terra nullius enabled the European power to claim the discovered land as part of its empire despite their being evident inhabitants. The British adapted the international law concept of terra nullius to govern the situation in “settled” colonies, which is how the law regarded Australia. The first test of terra nullius in Australia occurred with the decision of R v Tommy 1827, which indicated that the native inhabitants were only subject to English law where the incident concerned

Read More

Canoe V. Sparrow Case

554 Words | 3 Pages

The term “existing aboriginal rights” must be interpreted loosely to allow them to evolve over time. The court also stated that nothing in the Fisheries Act demonstrates a clear and plain intention to extinguish the Indian aboriginal right to fish. (1076). Also stating that the fishing permits were simply a way to control the fisheries.

Read More

Summary: The 1965 Freedom Rides

589 Words | 3 Pages

Since the arrival of the first fleet, through to 1945, Australia has made important progress in improving Indigenous freedoms and rights. This progress has been marked by protest movements like the freedom rides, policy changes such as the 1967 referendum, and legal victories such as the 1992 Mabo case. However, there are still significant challenges, including socio-economic disparities and struggles for land rights, that still prevent equality today in Australia. Australia has significantly improved Indigenous rights and freedoms from the first fleet to 1945. A way their rights were recognised and respected was through the 1965 Freedom Rides.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Racial Discrimination In Australia

756 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction The Racial Discrimination Act was implemented in 1975 and was drafted in response to a global push to codify protections for Indigenous Australians and other racial minorities. Section 18C of this act makes it unlawful to offend, insult, humiliate or intimate an individual or a group of people on the basis of race, colour or national origin (Austlii.edu.au.) This clause was brought to the fore front of national debate as popular conservative columnist, Andrew Bolt, was found in violation of this law when he accused mix-raced Indigenous Australians of using their heritage to claim government benefits. The Abbott government pledged to repeal section 18C but has subsequently withdrawn the motion following severe backlash from the wider community (Aston.)

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Aboriginal Health

2026 Words | 9 Pages

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) health is a legally obligated human right, which the government is expected to uphold and protect for the enjoyment of “all people without discrimination” (1). Australian legislation is the antithesis of the WHO’s definition, evidenced by the 1905 Aboriginies Act. The Act 'enshrined in policy the practice of child removal and entrenched paternalistic, racist, controlling and ultimately destructive attitudes towards Aboriginal people', research argues (2). It wasn't until 1962 that Aboriginal iAsuatralia gained the right to vote in Commonwealth elections, and only after the 1967 National Referendum that the Australian Constitution's race clause was eliminated, signifying the start of Indigenous Australians' citizenship rights. These developments were brought about by a social movements led by Indigenous people that arose during the 1950s and 1960s, which vigorously advocated for Aboriginal self-determination, sovereignty, and community control.

Read More

Public Misconceptions: Australia's Failure Of An Indigenous Treaty

1488 Words | 6 Pages

Following the controversial definition of sovereignty, a popular argument emerged claiming ‘a nation cannot make a treaty with itself’ from former prime minister John Howard. With Howard’s highly influential status, this was quickly adopted by many Australians who insisted that Indigenous people are also Australians and therefore a treaty would divide the nation. However, Howard’s definition is based on an extremely narrow understanding of the terms ‘treaty’ and sovereignty. This misconception negatively affects the process of treaty-making as it creates unprecedented fear when in reality Indigenous people do not seek recognition of statehood. Therefore, as the controversial debate over the implications of sovereignty continues, the underlying issue must first be addressed: an embedded and outdated definition weaponised by the HCA to prevent progression in treaty-making.

Read More

Civilising Process In Australia

510 Words | 3 Pages

Aboriginality in the 1900s was widely viewed as a socially primitive culture, whose behaviour was considered barbaric and therefore did not fit in with the values of ‘white Australia’ and ideals of the West about civility (Van Krieken 2000:247; Australian Human Rights Commission 1997). This resulted in the introduction of the NSW Aborigines Protection Board 1883 and the Aboriginal Protection Amending Act 1915 (NSW) that meant Australian government authorities had full control to attain legal guardianship of all Indigenous and half-caste children, to be ‘merged’ into the non-Indigenous population (Australian Human Rights Commission And Equal Opportunity Commission 1997). Conceptions by the State and church about civilisation warranted the intervention

Read More

Aboriginal Identity Essay

1190 Words | 5 Pages

Abstract Being an aborigine in a white dominated society is a complicated identity. Australia, one of the white governed nations, also owns many aboriginal tribes. They lived harmonious lives in the early period. But European colonization has made a profound effect on the lives of Aboriginals in Australia, which led to the total demolition of their native culture, identity and history. As a result the new generation Aboriginals have lost their Aboriginal heritage and have been accepted neither by Aboriginals nor by whites.

Read More

Secularism In Australia

1312 Words | 6 Pages

During the early years of the British colonising Australia, Indigenous Australians were immediately overpowered and taken advantage of. While the context of the following example is of a religious context, it is not limited only to that of the religious power of the state. Read (1981, p. 37) accounts for the 6000 Indigenous children in New South Whales alone who were forcefully removed from their families by the state between the years of 1883 and 1969, which Barker describes as government authority perceiving one group “more civilised” than the other. Similarly, Barker also points out the ineffectiveness of religious authority as an influence or control over individual lives in modernised western societies – societies in which removal of Indigenous children by the state, for example, is illegal and does not take place in a modern society that lacks the power it previously had, (2003, pp. 296-299). While this is only one example of how the church and state could be separate in modern Australia alongside separation of law and religion in the commonwealth constitution (Innes, 2009), Wallace (2005) notes that there was no mention of the church and state in this constitution – confirming the ambiguity of this legislation (Bouma, et al., 2011, p. 47).

Read More

Australian Identity Essay

894 Words | 4 Pages

The government's official apology in 2008, followed by the Closing the Gap targets aimed at narrowing disadvantage between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, are commendable steps forward. In recent years, there has been an increasing push for greater representation and recognition of the First Nations peoples, through initiatives such as Indigenous land use agreements and native title. Nevertheless, there is still much work to be done towards creating a society that actively upholds the rights and protections of all its citizens, especially those who have been historically oppressed. Australia has evolved exceedingly from the colonisers, the stolen generation to the gold rush and up until the present. Through every single event the people of Australia have stood up strongly supporting each other.

Read More

More about Kiefel CJ And The High Court Of Australia

Open Document