ipl-logo

The Pivotal Case Of Mabo V. Queensland (No. 2)

1505 Words7 Pages

The pivotal case of Mabo v Queensland [No.2] constitutes a significant shift in Australian law, authorising a new version of history that recognises Indigenous land rights and uses historical evidence to justify legal decisions. Utilising law and history reshaped legal history and redefined legal doctrines, notably with Indigenous land rights and how it overturned the doctrine of terra nullius. The 'Mabo' case, decided in 1992 by the High Court of Australia, challenged this doctrine by affirming Indigenous land rights, specifically on Eddie Mabo's claim to Murray Island. The essay ventures into the breakdown of the case decision. Looking at how it utilised historical evidence, its connection to legal precedent and sovereignty, and its reshaping …show more content…

417. Idem, p. 422. Ibid. P88, J. 1 et al. However, while it recognised history and connection to land, it was limited in scope. (https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/pop22/c03). The legal acknowledgment mainly focuses on land rights and title, implying that it neglected broader aspects of culture, sovereignty, and governing systems. There comes a risk of essentialising Indigenous identity and not fully recognising the complexity of culture and history, as the case framed Indigenous history into the problem of land ownership. (https://www.theage.com.au/opinion/a-judgment-that-changed-australia-20020609-gdua7g.html). Mabo recognised the inconsistencies between the Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act 1985 seeking to rid any pre-existing rights of the land which proved to conflict with section 10(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act (1975) (Cth). Page 84, Journal 1). Acknowledging this, allowed for the authorisation of an inclusive and accurate representation of Australian history. The Mabo decision significantly impacted sovereignty and legal precedent by challenging Crown authority and reshaping Australian law with recognition of native title …show more content…

( https://www.mabonativetitle.com/nt_30.shtml#::text=Mabo%2FNative%20Title%2FAn%20Expression%20Of%20Sovereignty&text=The%20recognition%20of%20native%20title,the%20authority%20of%20the%20state). The High Court held that the common law recognised native title, however, did not disrupt the position of the Crown as sovereign. The Native Title Act (1993) set out how native title rights 'are to be recognised and protected', (https://www.crownland.nsw.gov.au/protection-and-management/aboriginal-land-rights-and-native-title/native-title#::text=Native%20title%20is%20the%20name,to%20be%20recognised%20and%20protected.) claiming if native title were granted, it gave ownership (https://www.commonground.org.au/article/the-mabo-decision-and-native-title). The power to extinguish interests in land is a fundamental ideal of sovereign authority. Mabo decision, pages 33-34, 46, Page 161,

Show More
Related

Mabo Case Study Australia

154 Words | 1 Pages

To become a part of a society or culture by social characteristics and being part of a group. The Mabo Case was a legal case held in 1992 in the High Court of Australia which determined that Indigenous people should be treated equally using

Read More

How Did Eddie Mabo Win The High Court Of Australia

767 Words | 4 Pages

After 10 long years Torres Strait Islander Eddie ‘Koiki’ Mabo has lead indigenous Australians to a victory over the Queensland government. This win this case is a historical moment, as of yesterday, the indigenous Australians have been recognised as the owners of Murray Island. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are known to have resided in Australia, 40,000 to 60,000 years before the British arrived in 1788. When the British took over they decided to take all the land for themselves even though the indigenous Australians were here first. This court case recognises indigenous Australians unique connection to the land and acknowledges that they have the rights to the land.

Read More

The Mabo Case Study

695 Words | 3 Pages

When the Europeans first arrived in Australia, Indigenous Australians lost all their land rights. This was mainly due to the Europeans claiming that Australia was Terra nullius. Terra Nullius was a international law stating that if territory was not owned, it was to be given to the first nation to discover it and entitled to take over. The Europeans did not recognise the Aboriginals and Torres Strait islander people as the traditional owners of Australia and therefore took all there land rights. The indigenous people were then constricted by the terra nullius rule from 1788 to 1991.

Read More

How Did Eddie Mabo Change Australia

902 Words | 4 Pages

The Mabo decision changed the legal, political and social relationships between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. In recognising the traditional rights of Murray Islanders it changed Australia forever. The Mabo decision opened the doors for other indigenous people and groups to be able to claim ownership of land. They were required to prove that they had continuous connection to the land and maintained their traditional associating with it. The 'native title ' is the recognition by law that some aboriginal and torres strait islander people have rights to certain land due to their traditional laws and customs.

Read More

How Did The Mabo Decision Affect Australia

420 Words | 2 Pages

The Mabo Decision was a turning point for the recognition of the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. From recognising ownership of traditional lands to raising awareness of racial discrimination, it affected the Indigenous Australian society in various ways. Firstly, the Mabo Decision was significant because it acknowledged the ownership of traditional lands by abolishing “terra nullius”, meaning that the land is empty and owned by no one. Previously, the British denied the Indigenous Australians' connection and ownership of the land by declaring that Australia was "terra nullius". However, on the 3rd of June, 1992, the High Court decided that the Merriam people were "entitled as against the whole word to possession, occupation

Read More

How Significant Was The Mabo Decision 1995

620 Words | 3 Pages

The Mabo decision of the high court in 1992 is vastly significant as it marks history as the victory of indigenous Australian land rights against the federal government, who had colonised their land and refused to acknowledge that Australia was originally owned by the ATSI people but became a terra nullius land due to the European colonists. The events that have occurred before 1992 such as the The Aboriginal Land Rights Act (NT) of 1976 and the bark petition is deemed less significant than the Mabo decision. I firmly believe that the Mabo case is an extraordinary achievement. it started in 1982 when Eddie Mabo brought up a case against the supreme court of Queensland that Indigenous Australians should have land rights. After almost a whole

Read More

The Significance Of The 1992 Mabo High Court Case

702 Words | 3 Pages

The High Court ruled that Indigenous Australians had a right to claim native title to traditional lands that were not legally owned by the

Read More

Why Was The Mabo Decision Important

370 Words | 2 Pages

They were counted in the census and the right to vote was given to the Indigenous was given to them by the Commonwealth in 1962 and by all States in 1965. Queensland was the last state to grant Abroginial people these rights. Secondly, the Mabo Decision was important

Read More

What Is Jeff Kennett Speech Against Aboriginal Australia

1740 Words | 7 Pages

The Commonwealth was completely unprepared, and as the Mabo story gained traction, apathy started to fade away, knocking down any political policy the government had set out to conquer at the beginning of its term. On 3 June, 1992, the High Court of Australia rejected the doctrine of terra nullius and recognised Indigenous land rights for the first time. In doing so, the Commonwealth had admitted that the Indigenous peoples had lived in Australia for thousands of years, that their land had slowly dissolved into the colonies as they grew, underwriting the Australian identity. This lack

Read More

What Impact Did Rudd Have On The Aboriginal Civil Rights Movement

936 Words | 4 Pages

The speech was made as the prime minister had some concerns about the daily challenges that the Indigenous people had to tackle. It was made to capture the harsh truths about Australian history, and to use them as a beginning for building trust in the government’s motives among Indigenous Australians. The speech was created not only to help those Indigenous to help the civil rights movement but also to challenge what it would be like if those average white Australians experienced such injustices. It had been an historical event because it was the first time an Australian Prime minister had widely spoken about Indigenous discriminations that they have or had been experiencing. “Recognition that it was we who did the dispossessing.

Read More

Canoe V. Sparrow Case

554 Words | 3 Pages

The term “existing aboriginal rights” must be interpreted loosely to allow them to evolve over time. The court also stated that nothing in the Fisheries Act demonstrates a clear and plain intention to extinguish the Indian aboriginal right to fish. (1076). Also stating that the fishing permits were simply a way to control the fisheries.

Read More

Denomination Switching Essay

441 Words | 2 Pages

Mabo: The Mabo case was a judgment in the High Court of Australia in 1992 affirming that Aboriginal people could still have rights to land taken by settlers. Wik: The Wik decision was a legal judgment made in Australia in 1996 that protects the right of Aboriginal people to own land. However, it stated that Native Title could co-exist with other rights on land under pastoral lease but, if there is a conflict between Native Title and lease, the rights of the leaseholder will

Read More

Public Misconceptions: Australia's Failure Of An Indigenous Treaty

1488 Words | 6 Pages

Following the controversial definition of sovereignty, a popular argument emerged claiming ‘a nation cannot make a treaty with itself’ from former prime minister John Howard. With Howard’s highly influential status, this was quickly adopted by many Australians who insisted that Indigenous people are also Australians and therefore a treaty would divide the nation. However, Howard’s definition is based on an extremely narrow understanding of the terms ‘treaty’ and sovereignty. This misconception negatively affects the process of treaty-making as it creates unprecedented fear when in reality Indigenous people do not seek recognition of statehood. Therefore, as the controversial debate over the implications of sovereignty continues, the underlying issue must first be addressed: an embedded and outdated definition weaponised by the HCA to prevent progression in treaty-making.

Read More

Aboriginal Identity Essay

1190 Words | 5 Pages

Abstract Being an aborigine in a white dominated society is a complicated identity. Australia, one of the white governed nations, also owns many aboriginal tribes. They lived harmonious lives in the early period. But European colonization has made a profound effect on the lives of Aboriginals in Australia, which led to the total demolition of their native culture, identity and history. As a result the new generation Aboriginals have lost their Aboriginal heritage and have been accepted neither by Aboriginals nor by whites.

Read More

Why Is Shared History Important In Maintaining Cultural Identity?

700 Words | 3 Pages

A large majority of Australians have been presented with a version of Australian history that has minimised and ignored important events regarding Aboriginal people that include many violent and painful deaths that until recently have been hidden quietly. History is extremely important in forming cultural identity which in turn leads to an increased sense of security and belonging. Therefore a need for shared history is required in Australia for recognising the history of both Aboriginal and non-aboriginal people (Gore, 2008). When studying the history of Australia it is important to recognise that it is a shared history. The shared history of Australia acknowledges that the history of Australia began long before the British started to

Read More

More about The Pivotal Case Of Mabo V. Queensland (No. 2)

Open Document