Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about book banning
Essay about book banning
Consequenses of banning books
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Blei’s argument, as to why banning the book is counter productive, is very insightful. While other critics argue that the profanities in the book should be ignored when considering banning the book, Blei accepts the profanities and points out that there are a multitude of other ways for kids to be exposed to such things in their
This book should not be banned even though it portrays so many violent moments because it shows us the horrible reality of racial prejudice and discrimination. The Jews had to go through terrible things. For example, Elie “didn’t know that this was the moment in time
the book had way too much and it was way too mature and had lot’s of sexual context. I feel as if the books with mature language and racism are eye opening for kids and the books are a great example to show the kids. All kids have to take a health class and they learn about sex so what’s the difference?Kids have to grow up and mature at some point of time and if they see stuff like that in their local school library maybe they would seek awareness. This is not reasonable because what about the kids that are black, asian, chinese etc.. It may show awareness to the kids that white but to kids like them it seems wrong and unfair that racism is being displayed in their school and it could be discouraging.
I think Of Mice and Men should not be banned, but instead be taught in EVERY school, with responsible and mature teachers. ” says jmonkey1080 at http://www.teenink.com/opinion/school_college/article/534583/Should-Of-Mice-and-Men-Be-Banned-Worldwide/ .This is how I belive people should react when they see the book “Of Mice And Men” by John SteinBeck If you harm others there are consequences that you have to face they might not be as bad as in the book. This teaches kids how to use proper language while speaking to others. The rest of this essay is about why, “Of Mice And Men” should not be banned from schools.
First denounced by the Concord Public Library Committee on the grounds of being “flippant, irreverent, and trashy.” , it is now being banned on the basis of racism. The book has gone from immoral trash to racist trash. The Adventures of Huck Finn should not be banned because it shows the
Just because a book that was written many decades ago may have bad words in it, doesn’t mean that it should be withheld from the students. Additionally, the educational value of, The Catcher in the Rye would be totally lost if a book is banned just for containing “explicit” language. Sophomore students are at the age where they are old enough to know what is appropriate and what isn’t and they can read a book that has bad words in it. If a book is banned because of its explicit content, that overshadows the educational content and the moral lessons that the reader would take away from reading this book.
Why do people ban books? Why is it considered a banned book? In the banned book Gone, students could be able to learn positive and outgoing lessons from the book if they weren't banned in many places. Teens should be allowed to read Gone because it teaches students to show confidence, it shows to be hard working, and it also shows independance. First of all, Teens should be allowed to read the book Gone because it teaches to show confidence in everything that people do.
What could be so terrible about a book, that it has become one of the most frequently banned/challenged books? Of Mice and Men is a fictional book written by John Steinbeck in 1937. The book has been banned in many schools due to racism, profanity, foul language, violence, treatment of women, and for seemingly promoting euthanasia. This book is usually read by high school students around the age fourteen or fifteen, however many parents have gotten upset when hearing about what their kid was reading. Many parents have stated that this book is not age-appropriate and should not be read in school.
Some American school districts have banned Mark Twain's novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn because of the novel’s use of word “nigger”. The “N-word” is used 219 times throughout the book. (News, C. (2016, October 01). Different schools approach this topic in a variety of ways. Some schools completely ban the book, others teach the book how it was written but ignore and do not discuss the word, they buy a sanitized version that replaces “nigger” with "slave", or they teach the book saying “nigger”.
Although certain people may advocate for censorship, controversial literature should be used in the classroom because it provides an insightful class atmosphere. From reading books with less controversy behind them like The Lord of the Flies to the heavily debated The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, many people believe that students have no prior experience in controversial material. Due to this, they believe certain words and phrases should be censored to create a "safer" and "less offensive" environment for students. A book like The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, containing the n-word 219 times, is one many teachers and parents change for their students in hopes to protect them from such profanity. However, this causes difficulties for the teachers
Banned Books “Writers want to talk about creation, and censorship is anti-creation” (The New Yorker). The prohibition of a book or a film because of obscene, violent, racist or any other offensive content is the definition of censorship. Censorship gives authors constraints and limits that they must respect in order to avoid getting banned, acting as a threat towards them. The problem is that society does not appreciate the hidden meaning or reality of these books. For example, Of Mice and Men is a book written by John Steinbeck, which is banned for the use of racial slurs and violence, a normal behavior during the Great Depression, the time when the book takes place, that is why it is an example of modernism and people should be open minded
The novel does incorporate many uses of the offensive language it was banned for, and most unsightly were three instances of racial slurs, which may be inappropriate for high school readers. The use of the N-word occurs early on page eleven of the novel, and while not said to a Black character directly, it nonetheless carries the negative connotation that anyone tied with the meaning is less than other people. The use of the word as a casual way to refer to Black individuals could create a harmful idea in an easily-influenced reader that doing so is okay, which would create a reason to prevent young readers from obtaining the book and lead to a perhaps valid ban of the novel by the Strongsville Ohio school board in 1972. In a similar fashion, Catch-22, as said by Emily Getty in the Carnegie Mellon University Banned Books Project, was banned in
Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
In John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men, legality is often deemed less important than morality in terms of decision making. Multiple characters throughout the novel disregard the law in order to carry out their vision of justice. When Curley, the son of the ranch owner, discovers his wife’s body, he is furious. So furious that he plans to track Lennie, a new employee with an intellectual disability, down and murder him to get revenge for his mistake. Regardless of the law, Curley’s morals based on vengeance and masculinity drive him to kill Lennie.
Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with