Books have been used by people through centuries, the knowledge we have gained now would have been impossible without books (Allegro, 2014). There are 175 million adolescents in the world are can't read on the internet due to lacking any access to it (Das, 2015). That concludes that books are still the primary tool for knowledge acquisition. According to Adele and Milheim (1995) that libraries are not the just storehouse of books, but also provides interactive assistance to the readers, which includes inquiry services, photocopying, computer facilities, bibliographic assistance and library instruction. The library plays a large role in the student's academics and states that without the library in every school, the student's academics …show more content…
First, not everything you need is not on the internet, because he states that only 8% of the information on all journals are on the internet. Second, the world wide web is a vast unorganized library, because whatever you search engine you use it will just show the same results and sometimes it is not even relevant to whatever you're searching. Third, quality control doesn't exist on the internet, because the internet is growing very fast anyone can post on the internet and no one will validate it. Fourth, whatever you know will hurt you, because citations on the internet are often not available, and only the abstract of some journals are available. Fifth, the states can now distribute to a library but not on the web. Sixth, the libraries are now offering e-books. Seventh, all libraries have libraries, where you can go to take information and it is free. Eighth, the internet has fewer archives than the library. Ninth, the library is more deeper than the internet, because the materials that old enough are discarded by the internet, but libraries keep it because it knows more of its value. Lastly, books are more mobile than the