Facebook Had No Right To Edit History Erna Solberg Summary

744 Words3 Pages

In “Facebook Had No Right to Edit History”, the prime minister of Norway, Erna Solberg argues none of social networking sites can manipulate what can people get from the Internet. According to Solberg, nowadays news and social media corporations play a significant role in providing messages, however, the situation turns into altered truth and information manipulation. In the end of the article, Solberg suggests that we put the face on this issue to make sure our next generation has the right to understand the real world. Although Solberg needs more logic and experience to convince her readers, still, I do agree with Solberg’s claim that as a human being who is part of the history, I deserve to know the story of mankind and Facebook can’t deny this. For I believe I live in a society of individual freedom which allows me to express myself and guarantees my right to be closer to the truth. To begin with, before deleting those “inappropriate images” which breaches the content guidelines, Facebook ought to concern the story behind them. There are many cases show Facebook’s community standers can’t be the only way to decide whether the image is improper or not. In 2004, Facebook removed Emma Bond’s photograph, which documents the moving moment she breastfed her premature daughter for the …show more content…

In addition to the past preference and interests, what you see on your wall may be from a private company who pays for Facebook to advertise. What’s even more surprising, the news you read on Facebook is likely to be false to affect your thought and limit your perspective on the