Because news reporters are no longer the only ones to present information, citizens feel their way into the story, thus creating many layers of journalism. This use of affective publics does have both pros and cons, however. With many citizens presenting their beliefs, news on social media is powered by affective statements of opinion, fact, or a blend of both. In other words, many persuasive statements are opinion based rather fact based. On the other hand, with a large portion of society starting to dominate the media industry, citizens can emphasize and expose many underrepresented
Throughout this piece there are twenty-one words that contribute to an underlying belief of this article, such as “social media,” “web,” “internet,” “forum,” and “post.” These words show that one of the focuses of this article is the form in which rumors are spread on the internet, as they are the terms that appear quite often. In addition, the context in which social media is presented can be identified through further examination. The repetition of words such as “gossip,” “commenters,” and “comments” sixteen times shows that not only is the author focusing on the internet platform, but also what negative things are being presented on these sites. Finally, the way in which this story paints social media can be determined by the use of a negative word choice sixteen times.
Truth or Tale The two articles “How Facebook Makes Us Dumber” and “When ears don’t hear, truth is futile” though different, both make a very similar argument. Each illustrate that people refuse to hear the truth, and instead trust the lies. The article, “When ears don’t hear, truth is futile” by Leonard Pitts, expresses that people will only listen to the information that appeases their already formed ideas.
Author Laura Sessions Stepp in her article, “Why Not Let Kids Have Facebook Pages,” provides numerous examples of how kids under the age of 13 shouldn’t have a Facebook. Kids everywhere are saying “But Mom…!” with the tone of disappointment because they feel you are irreversibly forcing them into a permanent state of uncoolness amongst their social media peers. Stepp says that kids under the age of thirteen on Facebook are using faking names and ages, cyberbullying, and privacy.
One hundred years ago nobody heard about the news or current events from Facebook or the newest tweet. Until fairly recently the most up to date news had to be heard through the grapevine or read in a newspaper. Since the creation of the internet and the mass media that comes with it, information can now be spread all the way across the world in the time it takes to hit the enter button on a computer or phone and upload it to the internet. Some people think that this is a bad thing because so many things that are uploaded can be either false information or simply information that is misleading and could teach individuals the wrong thing. However, if mass media is used in the right way it can be beneficial to the accessibility of valuable information,
As some people may not want to believe, Facebook is in fact a media company as Caplan states in her article, “Like it or Not, Facebook is Now a Media Company” saying that Facebook basically has a chokehold on companies, voter turnout and also controlling the opinions of users. Back in the day, people relied on newspaper articles and the news channel for their daily dose of news. But now, with the social media world booming, all the young people are drawn to Facebook. Many people don’t even pick up a newspaper or turn on the television anymore for news, but rather just using their electronic device to go to the Facebook application. As Greenberg iterates in her article, “A Stranglehold on the News Industry That’s Bad for Readers”
A major problem that has dominated the world in today’s society is the development of mass media. The mass media is said, “to be divided into two types: print and broadcast,” but the advancement of the internet became problematic. The internet allows the public to view the news by providing information between the citizens, and government faster than any other source. Consequently, this resulted in the decline of newspapers while more people began reading online. The negative effect of the internet is described as, “a wild west atmosphere” in which individuals may post whatever they wish online, “without professional, organizational, or legal concerns about its source” (Janda, Berry, Goldman, Schildkraut, and Manna, 2017, 148).
Prior to the creation of websites such as Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr , communicating an idea to large numbers of people was slow and limited. What options did exist were flawed: newspapers edit and monitor the editorials they choose to publish, and social mobilization requires phone calls and handwriting letters-- a time consuming and labor intensive task. Social Media replaces editorials with blog posts that cannot be censored, and Facebook groups with the time and location of protests, replace slow and expensive phone campaigns. Furthermore, the internet allows people around the world to discuss current events in real time.
It’s not an understatement to say that since its conception, social media has irreversibly changed the nature of presidential campaigns. The first instance of such strategy was demonstrated in 2008, with Obama and McCain both effectively utilizing platforms such as Twitter and Facebook to engage with a broader demographic, particularly the younger voters with the proclivity to use such platforms. However, in the eight years leading up to 2016’s election, social media had contorted itself from such roots and grown into a prolific beast. Far more than just a greater audience, social media had gained a certain propensity for misinformation, propaganda, and targetted advertising.
Facebook’s free basics services, which is formerly known as internet.org, has been widely criticized in India for violating the principles of net neutrality. The idea that facebook is trying to portray is to give novices a taste of internet. But real idea behind this is to draw first-time users to their services and make them use to it daily and slowly encourage them to buy data services for costlier prices. This will be profitable for both internet service providers and facebook as well. By this, Facebook and its partners are discouraging people from using competing services, which will badly affect the start-up eco system.
Facebook and Privacy: Big Brother “Likes” Us Case Analysis Summary Introduction Facebook was founded by Harvard students Mark Zuckerberg, Eduardo Saverin, Dustin Moskovitz and Chris Hughes on Feb 4, 2004 known as Thefacebook. In the beginning, Facebook was “closed”, limited to college students to share information using their “.edu” email address, until it was opened for the high school students, then opened for the public users, moved beyond the narrow focus and became a social network that could link friends with other friends on the internet. By 2008, Facebook reaches 100 million active users overtaking “MySpace” to become the internet’s largest social network.
This, in turn, does the opposite of what social media were intended to do. Instead of allowing the expression of unaltered and original ideas, it is a platform of suppressed individualism which only encourages mainstream concepts. Conformity is seen everywhere, society encourages it. Social Media, News Broadcasters, and the FCC are all examples of underlying ways the top one percent can monitor and manipulate the ways people live their lives. Most people are controlled by others around them; posts on social media
Information and communication technology has seen lot of changes and advancements since the year 2000, key among them being the development of social media as a social influencer. It has become prominent parts of life for many young people today. We are all aware that social media has had a tremendous impact on our culture, in business, on the world-at-large and social media websites are some of the most popular haunts on the internet. Most people engage with social media without stopping to think what the effects are on our lives, whether positive or negative. Are we as society becoming more concerned with Facebook “friends” than we are with the people we interact with face-to-face in our daily lives?
In conclusion, political impact on social media is huge and obvious. Social media platforms is substituting the traditional formal news media which has restrictions on the news and information they share especially in closed societies. Governments of closed societies are facing a problem because the government cannot control the news and the information shared on the internet which diminish the government authority to control their citizens. Lack of control on internet has made social media a platform for activists in politics and human right
Social media was developed to link people to the world and is an effortlessly convenient method for communication. Due to this, people are able to get in touch with just about anyone from all over the world and it no doubt has an incredible amount of influence on our lives. However, not all of it may be positive. Almost everyone is aware of how social media impacts us on a micro scale, but what about the influence it has on a macro level? Interestingly enough, it has taken a tremendous toll on politics.
