Fahrenheit 451 Character Analysis
Q: How does Bradbury make Clarisse and Mildred memorable characters? In the novel Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, Bradbury makes Clarisse and Mildred memorable characters by making Clarisse a unique, happy character, making Mildred easily dislikable, and by making them extremely opposite. Clarisse McClellan lives life to the fullest. She enjoys the little things in life and questions why things are done.
A large majority of books use many types of literary elements and devices. An example of a literary device is imagery; the five senses. This is one of the most descriptive types of writing as it conveys what the character is feeling or smelling. It’s a more human way of writing in some ways. In the book Fahrenheit 451, the character Montag has a large amount of internal struggle throughout the book.
Ahmad—Showing that firemen will start burning things instead of ending fire was a very nice idea I don’t know how you came up with this idea. Bradbury—I was thinking about the things that happen in real life but we don’t see it. We always see doctors as good people because they risk our lives but not all of the doctors are good just how we think. I want you to think decently about this if you meet somebody doesn’t think he is good just because he is a doctor or he is bad because he has another job that you don’t like. I wrote about this in Fahrenheit 451 when Clarisse told Montage that he is not like all other firemen.
In the book Fahrenheit 451, we are introduced to two characters with two very different, but also very important, characteristics. Mildred, Guy Montag’s wife, is a shining example of how a member of this society should think and act. Clarisse, however, is the polar opposite of Mildred. The society of 451 is that of one without thought, creativity, and books.
In the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, society is unhappy, and sort of lifeless. It shows that a society without books cannot really produce a happy life. Mildred Montag is a prime example of this empty living represented in the book. Mildred is shallow and miserable, but plays an important role in representing society along with giving readers a contrast to Montag in this novel. Throughout the book Mildred is shown as a shallow and lifeless character.
Mildred and Meryl's personalities are very selfish; this is shown through their speech. Throughout ‘Fahrenheit 451’ Mildred constantly talks about her finances. Mildred states, “It's only two thousand dollars… and I should think you’d consider me sometimes,” (Bradbury 18). This is significant for the story because it opens up a lot of personality for Mildred. It makes her appear selfish because it seems like she only cares about materialistic items.
None of us are perfect. We all have our mistakes, flaws, and imperfections. Regardless of this, we still all strive to be perfect. We work on ourselves by trying to fix the problems and become better people. In doing this, we try to develop the traits we want.
She prays to be sculpted by the sculptor”. These lines display Mildred’s thoughts about herself and how she felt when she tried to commit suicide. “But that was another Mildred, that was a Mildred so deep inside this one, and so bothered, really bothered, that the two women had never met” (Bradbury 49). Mildred is so obsessed with the idea of being perfect and like everyone else that she has become like two different people without realizing it. The Mildred on the surface is just like everyone else.
Our society is doomed. Everyday we become more and more similar to the society within Fahrenheit 451 as we become less and less patient and more and more conform becoming what we think society wants us to be rather than what we ourselves want to be. Have you ever wanted something so bad and you just had to have it right now, you couldn’t wait any longer? This means you have felt instant gratification the need to have something right now no waiting. In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury the society is full of people who constantly have instant gratification.
In order to create a basis of vulnerability, Steinbeck deprives George and Lennie of primordial necessities, forcing the characters to confront the harsh realities of the human condition. Steinbeck beautifully depicts the nature of mankind when Lennie innocently kills mice and rabbits. In a balance of ignorance of accountability and fear of getting into trouble, Lennie whispers "George ain't gonna let me tend to the rabbits." George contains an understanding of the transient nature of life, reflected by his nomadic lifestyle as a result of Lennie’s actions. Although George and Lennie have graduated beyond the years of childhood, we may relate Erikson’s theories to Lennie’s behavior because Lennie remains in a child-like mindset.
Each of the stories were developed with the same ideas in mind. Both stories start with a heavenly setting. God in heaven wanting to create the world and the rich Sky World featured in the Iroquois story. Soon the harmony is broken when women in both of the stories perform a malfeasance act. The women were to not touch a sacred tree in their world.
The NA meeting had a guest speaker named Adam, the most surprising thing about meeting were candor and humor evoked by the speaker. Adam acknowledged that he has been addicted to drugs for seventeen years, and this behavior started when he was in the 7th grade. Adam was genuinely outspoken and humorously shared being in and out of treatment facilities over 28 times costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. The group really identified with the speakers story, and this was exhibited by laughter and comments from the crowd. Actually, I didn’t have any perceived notions about attend NA meeting, my only contention was to better understand this community.
What begins the changes in Montag and what are the changes in him? In Ray Braudbury’s novel, Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag undergoes major changes because of the influence of other intellects and events; in effect this caused him to ruminate about events that were considered “normal”. Montag’s occupation is firefighting, however he is not the traditional version of a fire fighter. Montag does not put out fire, but rather helps ignite them.
Fahrenheit 451 Literary Analysis Fahrenheit 451 is a book that I was able to read and identify with very quickly. I took away a few key concepts from this book more than others. While reading this book, the main thing I want to clarify is that this is a book that makes you think. This book left me with a lingering thread of curiosity and worriness that I continued to think about after class.
Montag’s wife Mildred is an example of someone who conforms to society and can not imagine a lifestyle outside the one she has. In Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 Mildred says to Montag “books aren’t people. You, read and I looked all around, but there isn’t anybody! Now, my family is people.
More about Fahrenheit 451 Character Analysis
Summary Of Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury
647 Words | 3 PagesFahrenheit 451: Literary Analysis
202 Words | 1 PagesCharacter Analysis Of Ray Bradbury's 'Fahrenheit 451'
1000 Words | 4 PagesMildred In Fahrenheit 451
493 Words | 2 PagesWho Is The Lifeless Character In Fahrenheit 451
820 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Loyalty In Fahrenheit 451
706 Words | 3 PagesFahrenheit 451 Character Analysis
1017 Words | 5 PagesIndividuality In Fahrenheit 451
1109 Words | 5 PagesFahrenheit 451 Individuality Analysis
587 Words | 3 PagesFahrenheit 451: Character Analysis
1457 Words | 6 PagesCompare And Contrast Iroquois And Genesis
528 Words | 3 PagesThe Humor Of NA Meeting
277 Words | 2 PagesFahrenheit 451 Character Analysis
704 Words | 3 PagesFahrenheit 451 Literary Analysis Essay
580 Words | 3 PagesConformity In Fahrenheit 451 Essay
541 Words | 3 Pages