The Fair Housing Law was introduced to prohibit the selling of a home based off of a person’s gender, race, or religion. This law was introduced during the civil rights era due to the urging of President Lyndon B. Johnson after Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination in 1968. After the passing of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the law now included protection for people with disabilities. Anyone violated by this type of discrimination can make a complaint to the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity for no payment. The United States Department of Justice is able to file a case to the Supreme Court if there is a pattern of discrimination seen within an area or company.
In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court enforced the fair housing law and limited the disparate impact of this act. The fair housing law was passed to protect a home owner or renter from any discrimination displayed by a seller or landowner. Even though such housing discrimination may not be intended deliberately, it can still be considered illegal. Disparate impact means if an employment or housing is based
…show more content…
The case, Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, debated over the fact that the Inclusive Communities Project (ICP) believed that too much tax credit from the state’s Department of Housing and Community Affairs was being directed to developers of affordable housing. ICP argued specifically that the building of houses would prevent black families from moving into more diverse communities. The construction of all these homes would more likely concentrate a black community preventing them from being integrated into society. ICP said that this was a direct violation to the Fair Housing Act which they upheld with statistical evidence. The other side, the Department of Housing and Community, refuted that the authorization of this disparate impact lawsuit is not supported by the