ipl-logo

Feudalism: Explain The Later Success Of Western And Japanese Societies

722 Words3 Pages

Do you think the characteristic of feudalism help explain the later success of Western and Japanese societies? If so, in what ways? If not, why not?

Feudalism did explain the later success of Western and Japanese societies. The successful item was the development of a more stable and centralized government called feudalism by elite military virtues. Feudalism also has less positive aspects of western European and Japanese by the development of imperialist expansion and that they frequently resorted to war to solve conflicts with foreign power. The successful thing that still affects political life and institutions in both the West and Japan is the idea of personal ties between leaders or among elite groups as a foundation for political activity. Both societies also were successful in industrial …show more content…

Feudalism shows that claims of central authorities are not matched by effective power. Regional leaders will take over by having armies of their own and do much of the effective administration of their localities. Also, kings have to make deals with other leaders that they must be reliant on personal negotiation and pledges of mutual respect, marriage alliances, negotiation, and a willingness to give the local princes free rein in practice. China or Arab might be skeptical since they always wanted to unify the nation rather than dividing it. By having it run by independent lords, feudalism would cause peasants to revolt since peasants would be forced to protect their lord and cause a gap between rich and poor which then lead to unrest. Feudalism also would fail to maintain order when nomads invaded since peasants are revolting, there is social unrest and there is no protection for the lord. Lastly, it gave all kings power, which created an oppressive system which lower class citizens did not

Show More
Related
687 Words | 3 Pages

Tokugawa Japan + Medieval Europe Medieval Europe and Tokugawa Japan lived in seclusion to each other, and yet there were many uncanny similarities between Tokugawa Japan and Medieval Europe. In Medieval Europe there were many key features of the social system that were introduced at the time. The social system of Medieval Europe was called Feudalism. Feudalism puts the King in charge of everything and everyone, with barons and nobles underneath him. The nobles provide loyalty and knights to the king in return for land to control.

Read More
74 Words | 1 Pages

Feudalism was a social, political, and economic system that tyrannized all conditions of medieval life. Despite what many might think, the European and Japanese feudal systems is well known across hundreds of nations all over the world. This includes the political, economic, and social order. The economic fraction of feudalism was centered around the lord 's estates or manor.

Read More
1412 Words | 6 Pages

Feudalism was a key component of life for those in both Western Europe and Japan. The two systems developed independently from each other yet still held a multitude of similarities. However, their many differences out shadow the unique parallels they shared. The major discrepancies between the two are found in each’s code, structure and regulations. Documents nine and ten, break down the feudal structures of Western Europe and Japan.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

The societies of Tokugawa Japan (c.1603-1867C.E.) and medieval Europe (c.1000-1500C.E.) had two things in common; a feudal system. A feudal system is something that features hierarchies or social structures. The feudal system normally starts with a religion, which is at the very top of the social pyramid, then it’s the King or monarch for Europe and the shogun for Japan, then there are the nobles for Europe and the daimyos for Japan. As we go down the pyramid there are the warriors, like the knight in Europe and the samurai in Japan, then there are the peasants. The peasants were included in both eras and are at the lowest part of the pyramid.

Read More
1166 Words | 5 Pages

Feudal systems connected the people to their land.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

In the 1500s and the 1600s the feudal system was beginning to fall. Different countries were trying new different types of governments instead of the dysfunctional feudal system. The feudal system consisted of many different nobles ruling over their own land. It was not a uniform system of ruling over the country. There were small city-states run by a singular ruler.

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

The system of feudalism weakened the Zhou Dynasty (1123?-256 BCE) and lead to the Warring States period because the system gave too much power to the nobles, causing them to become more powerful than the king and eventually have the potential to take over ruling. Feudalism is defined as a political system in which nobles are granted the use of land that legally belong to their king, in exchange for their loyalty, military service, and protection for the people who live on the land. According to the Zhou King Chao advisor Ying-hou in the 2nd century BCE, “A hundred men scrambling to fetch a gourd by cart will accomplish less than one man holding it in his hand and walking purposefully.” This relates to the negative impact feudalism had because

Read More
412 Words | 2 Pages

Both Tokugawa Japan (c. 1603 – 1867 c.e.) and Medieval Europe (c. 1000 – 1500c.e.) were defined by a definite social structure called feudalism. This social structure was a distinct and important part of life in medieval times. Both feudal systems consisted of different classes and roles that were controlled by a single leader. Japan’s Shoguns and Europe’s Kings oversaw the whole feudal system and controlled all classes beneath them. Although Japanese Emperors were at the top of the social structure they did not have any power over the Shogun.

Read More
414 Words | 2 Pages

Western Europe went through their feudal systems before Japan did, almost three hundred years in fact. Although Japan and europe did not have direct contact with each other in the medieval and modern times, they independently grown their own social political systems that had very much in common to one another. Both feudal Japan and feudal Europe had differences and similarities in this time period. Both the Japanese and European feudal systems developed as a result from a weak central government. As a result of having no strong central government politically, individual landowners gained power in both of the regions.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

However, this could be better seen in their form of government. Feudalism was a system that had land owners at the top (Kings and lords) and those who worked the land and keep the community safe at the bottom. It was basically impossible to move between social classes, and a desire to keep the rich with the rich meant that one couldn’t marry into money It was a social, economic, political, and legal system that stood in place for hundreds of years. The system, however meant that the government was weak, and it rarely stretched far; the larger the kingdom, the harder it was to keep it working. It also meant there were a lot of poor people living in the fifteen hundreds.

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

Feudalism is strongly connected to religion. Nobles and monarchs supplied land grants to the Church to receive blessings and spiritual support. Monarchs maintained control and power by the support of other powerful people known as lords. The Church was at the top of the political chain, more specifically

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

The feudalistic system in the medieval ages insured that serfs, nobles, vassals, lords, and kings, get and gave what they needed

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

(384) Peasants were not longer free men; they were under the control in every aspect of life which created the system of feudalism. (384) With control over the entire population the feudal lords fueled a commercial transformation that allowed Europe to gain access to the rest of the worlds trade system. Although this area of Europe was considered barbaric and was feared by the peasants in the region and others, Eastern Europe was much more wide-open and many opportunities existed. (385)

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

(Brown.edu, 1972) Due to this, workers had better wages and working conditions. Which led to a shift in power from the lords to the peasants as they were now able to demand more rights and freedoms. This transfer of power contributed to the end of the feudal system and the rise of the middle class. This was significant because the feudal system had been the dominant social and economic system in Europe for centuries.

Read More
212 Words | 1 Pages

On the contrary, during the European Renaissance the Church of England alone was a force to be reckoned with and still had a massive say on legal proceedings. Even though the Churches influence in politics was weakening the popularity of religion was growing, and so it’s evident that christianity remained a vital and essential element of European Renaissance culture. One explanation for this growth is that the Renaissance placed emphasis on knowledge and travel, and so Europeans were experiencing a lot of other new territories, cultures, peoples and religions as they ventured to new places. Europeans also began experiencing an increase in immigration as technological advancements enabled global mobility for the first time. This led an increase

Read More

More about Feudalism: Explain The Later Success Of Western And Japanese Societies

Related Topics

Open Document