In her essay, Is Forgiving Student Loan Debt a Good Idea?, Kayla Webley, an education correspondent for Time magazine argues the thought of reducing the debt from student loans. Webley, for the most part is successful in arguing her claim, through her use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos. Webley, effectively pushes her argument through her strong use of Logos, and Ethos, however, lacks in her ability to fully connect emotionally through Pathos. The author starts off her argumentative essay by summarizing recent issues and events surrounding the topic of her debate, to connect logically and bring her audience to a level of similar understanding about the matter. Logos is an essential method used to persuade people to agree on a subject purely through logical reasoning. Webley, understands the importance of connecting logically with her audience and emphasizes this communication technique with her use of statistics, quotes, and studies. The writer disputes the notion of ridding …show more content…
The use of pathos in the author’s argumentative essay is not as apparent or equally used. Webley’s lack of emotional connection to her readers limits the impact of her writings effect on her audience. Many make decisions based off of their emotional connection or response to a certain situation through pathos, because it has the ability and power to have a larger and more meaningful impact on a vast majority. This argumentative essay does contain pathos, however, its lack of explanation slightly hinders any type of emotion that may cause people to want to act immediately or stand with the ideas that Webley is trying to present. The author introduces examples that contain an emotional connection throughout her essay, however, she doesn’t expand on those ideas enough in order for a substantial appeal to be successfully