Fracking Argument Analysis
Recommended: The role of technology to environment
David Glazer AP Language and Composition Johnson 2/3/16 Analyzing “A Field Philosopher’s Guide To Fracking” In his book A Field Philosopher’s Guide to Fracking, Adam Briggle documents his journey to fight fracking in the small town of Denton, Texas. Recently hired as a professor of philosophy at the University of North Texas, Briggle moves to Denton never having heard of fracking before. Fracking is a type of drilling that increases oil production and effectiveness but, as Briggle would learn, has severe consequences on the community.
Why is fracking dangerous? During the fracking process natural gases are realized into the well where they are drilling often contaminating the nearby groundwater with methane gases and chemical toxins. After the fracking process the waste fluid is evaporated releasing volatile organic compounds causes acid rain, contaminated air, and ozone at
Natural gas is said to be the fuel of the recent future but at this point in time it as a resource that is quickly dwindling. A process called hydraulic fracturing or fracking is being used to access hidden reserves of gas in shale deposits under the ground. The process of fracking isn't new, but is being used more frequently and in more areas as easy-to-access deposits run out. This is where the dispute comes in; is the economic gains of fracking worth the environmental harm it causes? Fracking is too dangerous to risk when finding ways to access natural gas because it can affect water sources, has long lasting effects on the environment, and ruins areas surrounding the well site.
Universally, fracking and the construction of pipelines consistently have a negative impact on
"Hydraulic fracturing, the process of extracting oil or gas by forcing fluids into the ground to fracture shale rocks, at the Eagle Ford Shale Play has produced more oil and natural gas but at the cost of environmental hazards and affect human health. The part of the process that creates the environmental hazards is the fracking fluids that are forced into the ground. For each fracking job, these fluids are comprised of 1 to 8 million gallons of water and 40,000 gallons of chemicals. Some of the 600 chemical carcinogens and toxins in the fracking fluids are lead, radium, uranium, mercury, methanol, hydrochloric acid, ethylene glycol, and formaldehyde. Once the fracking job is done, about 50 to 70 percent of fracking liquids are left in open
One reason is that it is allowing the natural gas industry to boom, and natural gas is much cleaner than other fossil fuels. Natural gas produces only two thirds the amount of emissions of crude oil and only half as many emissions as coal. This has given natural gas the label of a transition fuel, which could be used by countries to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. Transitioning more to natural gas can help lessen the effects of climate change, due to the fact that it is cleaner than other fossil fuels. Another benefit of fracking is that it allows stores of oil and natural gas to be harvested that previously seemed out of reach.
1. Even though fracking reduces carbon emissions, it is still harmful to the environment. For example: water pollution/contamination. There can be accidental seeping of the chemicals (possibly carcinogenic) and can contaminate groundwater around the site due to bad practice (this imposes harm to both the ecosystem and people 's health).
By fracking for natural gas and shifting from coal to natural gas power generation plants, we could benefit economically, save our environment, and save millions of gallons of
Why would we turn down these great benefits? Although improved society and an economic boom are essential for a thriving nation, this process also contributing to global warming, pollution of our water and air supply, as well as the increase in seismic activity. These effects are sometimes irreversible and difficult to combat. In the case of global warming, fracking plays a huge role.
Proposition P================ Propostion P was advanced by an advocacy group known as the Santa Barbara Water Guardians, mainly to prohibit the usage of hydraulic fracturing (i.e fracking) within Santa Barbara, threatening its water supply. As such, Proposition P is absolutely essential, not only to ensuring the health of residents in Santa Barbara, but to ensuring long term social, economic, and environmental stability. Where opponents to Proposition P may tend to make arguments which solely favor the number of jobs in the community, or which perhaps presume the importance of the oil industry in Santa Barbara, over other concerns in the community, these other concerns need to be considered more fully in order to illustrate why support of Proposition P is absolutely essential.================
Fracking Protest and the Fight for Aboriginal Rights, David Shwartz and Mark Gollom of CBC News begin by providing the information that it is Canada’s “duty to consult and accommodate aboriginal people when the development is on their traditional land.” Non-aboriginal people in New Brunswick also opposed fracking in the area. Because of this, the county’s council “voted nearly unanimously for a moratorium on shale gas exploitation” (Shwartz & Gollom para.8). Stephen Augustine, principal of Unama’ki College, explained how the rights to lands or resources of the Mi’kmaq and Maliseet people were never surrendered in treaties, but that the treaties were of “peace and friendship,” which the Canadian government has acknowledged. Bill Gallagher, the author of Resource Rulers: Fortune and Folly on Canada’s Road to Resources who spent the first third of his life in New Brunswick, believed this protest was a part of a continuum; that there are issues the government must go back to address, and a cooling-off period is needed.
I am really neutral on the issue. I know there are benefits to fracking for natural gas. It is better for the climate than fossil fuels, and it is cheaper. What I do not know is the extent of the damages it can potentially cause. It is a relatively new practice, and enough time has not passed to cause justification or condemnation.
A third way that fracking is a useful resource is that It lowers energy cost. The United states can produce natural gas for only $2.50 per thousand cubic feet making it the world’s best and cheapest liquefying technology. Robert Hefner points out that the cost of heating 65 million American home by natural gas has fallen $20 Billion annually. Plus, The comparative decrease in natural gas cost for low-income households was more than $10 billion. Since then the United states has become the world’s low-cost producer of natural gas.
Despite, the human’s constant concerns about the impact of fracking on the environment, human health and other issues, it has been one of the most important innovations for the economy in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the last century. “It’s almost impossible to overestimate the importance of fracking to the natural gas industry and the nation”. The importance of fracking on the economy in Northeastern Pennsylvania is similar to everywhere else in the United States. However, ever since the discovery of this technology, Northeastern Pennsylvania in particular has transformed completely.
Our natural resources are at risk every time fracking occurs. Fracking needs to be banned since it is hurting our health and that it drains our natural and limited resources required for us to sustain life. Water is an essential to living and it is a need. Without it we would be dead from the dehydration. Fracking in this case can contaminate it to where we cannot drink it and if we do it can lead to death or a trip to the hospital:
More about Fracking Argument Analysis
A Field Philosopher's Guide To Fracking Analysis
335 Words | 2 PagesWhy Fracking Is Bad
116 Words | 1 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Fracking
856 Words | 4 PagesFracking Criticism
1632 Words | 7 PagesFracking Research Paper
491 Words | 2 PagesHydraulic Fracking Advantages
1275 Words | 6 PagesFracking Is Still Harmful To The Environment
49 Words | 1 PagesOil Fracking In Texas
721 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Essay On Hydraulic Fracking
537 Words | 3 PagesFracking Argumentative Essay
613 Words | 3 PagesFracking Argument Analysis
1957 Words | 8 PagesThesis Statement For Fracking Essay
340 Words | 2 PagesFracking Argumentative Analysis
150 Words | 1 PagesArgumentative Essay On Fracking
951 Words | 4 PagesFracking Persuasive Speech
943 Words | 4 Pages