ipl-logo

Frankenstein Analytical Essay

842 Words4 Pages

In society, many people live by rules that help society thrive. Many choose to live by different standards and change the way it works. In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelly, the main character known as the creator or Frankenstien creates a creature that breaks all the rules in society. In a Hierarchical structure, hierarchy can be changed, and in this book: the advancements in science question those beliefs, challenge society, and the way the main character responds to his creation for society. To start, the main scientist creates a creature to try and advance science way beyond its time. By creating this creature, also known as the monster, it turns on him and leaves. Frankenstein questions many aspects of his life and fears that the …show more content…

With the evidence presented in the book it is clear that he wanted through the advancements in science to create something no other person has created, this in turn became dangerous for society and himself. Challenging society for fame and recognition was one of the main goals of the scientist, until he became ashamed of his creation. The monster goes out in the world and tries to think for itself, and learn more about society. This isn't the goal of the scientist, and is shocked when the creation comes back to it months after the experiment asking for a friend. The scientist didn't want to further advance this mistake he already made and said no, this made the monster go out and kill many of the scientist's closest people in life. The response of the scientist challenging society and the social norms backfired on him, causing a danger to himself and the others around him. The scientist changed the rules of society by creating this monster, but later regrets what he has done causing him to question a lot of his beliefs. This can be interpreted into the work as a whole, by showing that challenging the hierarchical structure of life through a social standpoint can change how someone views the world, and changes the aspects of …show more content…

As the book progresses, the scientist realized what challenging the rules of society meant. There were many consequences for the scientist and it changed the way he viewed the world. When he created the monster in the lab, he thought it would solve a lot of his personal problems. His response to the hierarchy in this significant way, changed the scientist. It made him eternally grateful for others around him, but also made him really paranoid. With the monster out in society he constantly feared what it would do next, and how it would damage society. This was never the intention of the experiment in the first place, but by advancing with it it forever changed the creator of this monster. To further explain, in the book, the scientist tried to go out and destroy his creation, destroying the very thing he wanted to change society with, but with this the monster kept taking what valued most to the scientist: his family. This whole response to reject a hierarchical structure helps define the theme of the dangers of science and the ethics that surround it, and shows the dangers of challenging society that went too

Open Document