The research of great Frankenstein Have you ever thought there was more information on Frankenstein then what you are told by the scary movies? Well in Mary Shelly’s book Frankenstein you are able to see that monsters aren’t always horrible but the can be. We find out in her story that if Frankenstein would have given the creature guidance and love that he would have probably never did an of the violent thing he did. Many people have enjoyed her book but there is a lot of citizen on it.
According to Jessica Bomarito and Russel Whitaker that “Upon its publication, Frankenstein garnered commercial success as a Gothic novel, but critically it was for the most part condemned as sensationalist and gruesome.” This quote is saying that the book was
…show more content…
In this quote these two authors are quoting that over the years as she wrote this book she made Frankenstein overlook the elementary side of the story. The also talk about how this book should have not been written by a girl that she had no idea what she was talking about and the best person to write this was a boy. “That Scott and most contemporary re- viewers attributed Frankenstein to a male author (among the reasons Shelley might have seemed a likely choice is the novel's inclusion of the second stanza of "Mutability," published in 1816 with Alastor) would not silence a "debate between ideological feminists and theorists of the imper- sonality of texts"-unless, perhaps, these hypotheti- cal combatants had an unduly superstitious reverence for facts” (Donald, Paul 1982), this quote is the reason so many people thought that shelly should have not written this book. But Chris agrees with Donald and Paul by saying “Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein has over the last twenty years emerged from the shadows of paraliterature to become one of the most widely discussed English works of the nineteenth century, an arena for debate and