ipl-logo

Fritz Heider's Astribution In The Development Of Attribution Theory

799 Words4 Pages

BACKGROUND
From the theories made by a group of Social Psychologists; Fritz Heider, Harold Kelley, Edward Jones and Keith Davis, greatly contributed in the development of Attribution theory through time. Attribution theory was written in heider’s first book The Psychology of Interpersonal Relationships during the year 1958 that has been the main part in the origination and meaning of attribution theory. A set of rules of inference Fritz Heider hypothesized that an ordinary individual might attribute responsibility to another individual for an action. Fritz Heider also distinguished between two attributions namely the external and internal attributions. In 1965 the systematic hypotheses by Keith Davis and Edward Jones about the perception of …show more content…

This is what attribution theory is concerned about. Attribution is a process by which individual explain and predict the cause of other people’s actions and who or what was responsible for that behavior or outcome. This theory is concerned by in what way persons interpret or understand events and by what means this relates to their thinking and actions. Attributing behavior can be done in few processes. First, an individual must observe either his own behavior or of that of another individual. Second, an individual or someone must determine if the behavior or action being observed is intentional. Third or lastly He or she must attribute the observed …show more content…

Consensus is high or strong if another person behaves in the same manner as the person being observed in the circumstance, while consensus is weak or low if the other person behaves differently than the person being observed in the same situation.
Consistency
When an individual being observed is acting the same when he encountered same situation, the action being observed is what you call consistent. Consistency is low, if an individual acts in a same manner facing a different situation and if the individual acts in a differently manner facing a same situation its consistency is considered low. The main question in consistency is: does the observed individual always reacts in the same way to this stimulus?

Distinctive
When a person observes another person behaving or acting the same way in a different circumstance, the observed action is determined whether an action is distinctive. If an individual acts the same in a different situation, the distinctiveness is low, while if an individual acts different in different situation, the distinctiveness is high. The question being comprehended here is does the individual being observed responds in the same way to other stimuli as

Show More
Related
603 Words | 3 Pages

Every person is responsible for his or her actions. As Smail Balic said in his response essay “No soul carries the burden of another. ”(110) Only the guilty can absolve their guilt, but sometimes it takes the acknowledgment and words of another human to reach this release. This can be as small as a person who makes a rude remark to another then someone else steps in and calls them out.

Read More
1508 Words | 7 Pages

In the paper “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility”, Susan Wolf discusses her ideas on what is necessary for an individual to be responsible for their actions. She argues that in order for the person to be held morally responsible for their actions, they need to be morally sane. To consider one to be morally sane, this individual must have an ideology that is able for them to distinguish right from wrong. Hence, a morally sane person must be able to reason and have a sound mind. Furthermore, Wolf establishes the sane deep-self view by applying other philosopher’s ideas.

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

This example represents defensive attribution because the two men blame the accident on the man crossing the street and not themselves; who in fact were clearly at

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

In the movie, Philadelphia, psychologists are able to apply: attribution theory, self-verification theory, social identity theory, cognitive dissonance, and drive theory to explain the behavior of some people. The attribution theory explains the cause of someone’s behavior by associating it to their personality or situation. In the movie, it is applied when Andrew is fired. The law firm claimed that they fired Andrew because of his incompetence, which is a fundamental attribution error because they were blaming him for the reason they fired him.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Erik Erikson’s psychosocial stage of initiative versus guilt as well as B.F. Skinner’s operant conditioning within behaviorism would be the theories that best describe the given scenario. Initiative vs. Guilt At this stage, it is known that children assert themselves more frequently and according to Bee (as cited in Thatcher, 2011) it is a “time of vigor of action and consists of behaviors that the parents may see as aggressive". This stage also sees the child wanting to initiate and complete his/ her own actions for a purpose.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Following successful studies using TB-500 by researchers at Wayne State University School of Medicine to together with the Kresge Eye Institute in Detroit, Michigan, RegeneRx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc published the results of this study which showed that thymosin beta 4 was an active corneal wound healing and anti-inflammatory agent Thymosin beta 4 is a protein that naturally occurs in all cells except in erythrocytes. Despite this protein being a key monomeric actin-sequestering peptide within cells and with ability to depolymerize F-actin, studies are showing that it has several diverse cellular functions. In this particular study, the researchers investigated the multiple mechanisms of action associated with Thymosin beta 4 and the role it

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

Finally, the fundamental attribution error occurs when a person fails to notice situational factors and assume that a behavior or specific actions are due to an individual’s personality or character traits (Harman, 1999).

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

Describe the role of situational and dispositional factors in explaining behavior The roles of situational and dispositional factors in explaining behavior could be explained using the attribution theory where attribution is the process of interpreting and explaining behavior and how people try to use these factors to do this . Situational factors refer to external influences such as who you surround yourself with, social norms, the situation and the weather while dispositional factors are about internal factors such as your personality, attitude and beliefs . In explaining behavior these factors can either be combined as one explanation or used separately to determine the cause of one’s actions.

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

In doing this the individual can create their own theories behind the event and are able to develop a plan for the future if a similar event was to occur (Jasper M.

Read More
2031 Words | 9 Pages

A set of characteristics by which something is familiar is an identity. People are able to recognize a chair by its flat surface and the legs that support it, however, humans adapt to this identity. For instance, there may be only one leg, but that does not stop it from being identified as a chair. When talking about humans the basic idea of identity tends to become perplexing. This does not stop oneself from identifying various people.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

No one knows for sure why we commit the fundamental attribution error, but one likely culprit is the fact that we’re rarely aware of all of the situational factors impinging on others’ behavior at a given moment. Contrarily, we’re less likely to commit the fundamental attribution error if we’ve been in the same situation ourselves or been encouraged to feel empathic toward those we’re

Read More
2732 Words | 11 Pages

Do victim precipitation theories mean victim blaming? Explain and evaluate. 1.0 Introduction of victim precipitation Victim precipitation theories generally involve an explanation of how an individual’s behavior may contribute to his or her own victimization. In future the victim precipitation is behavior by a victim that initiates subsequent behavior of the victimizer and the degree to which victim is responsible for own victimization Early attempts at studying victim behavior involved the development of typologies that allowed victimol-ogists to determine who was most responsible for the criminal incident offender or victim. For instance, Wolfgang first introduced the formal concept of victim precipitation in his seminal work on homicide in 1958 when he argued that, in some instances, the victim may initiate the behavior of the victimizer .

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

It exists on distant dyads (strangers) but not with close dyads (friends). Distant dyads tend to took responsibility of success to themselves and failure to their partner, because they did not know each other. They do not have an idea on the characteristics of their partner. But on close dyads, they already have an impression of their partner, which means they already have an idea on his or her characteristics. This impression affects their decision making on whether they credit themselves for success and blame their partner for failing the task.

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

But Jane made him sign a contract which hurt him very much. All these hurt his self-evaluations. 2. Are attribution errors present? Attribution theory explains the ways in which we can judge the people.

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

2. Literature Review 2.1 The Development of Attribution Theory The attribution theory is one of the newly developed learning motivation theories. From the literal meaning, the attribution theory can be understood as the processing of attributing the consequences of acts or events to some causes.

Read More

More about Fritz Heider's Astribution In The Development Of Attribution Theory

Related Topics

Open Document