ipl-logo

Gang Abuse Case Study

1530 Words7 Pages

Gang member’s brig their criminal activities to school and create an atmosphere of violence when rival gangs have conflicts (Arciaga, Sakamoto, & Jones, 2010). To back this up, in August 2010, the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse showed that 46% of public schools kids report gang presence. They also show only 2% at private schools (Arciaga, Sakamoto, & Jones, 2010). This causes many schools to formulate plans on how to deal with gang presence on school property. Some of those actions are discussed here. First, it’s important to know who is affected the most. In 2007, the National Crime Victimization Survey shows an increase in gangs on or near school campuses with urban areas affected the most. Urban: 36% increase Suburbs: 21% increase …show more content…

School authorities are unable to recognize it (Arciaga, Sakamoto, & Jones, 2010). 2. Shows the public the school is unable to provide a safe environment for learning. This is bad because: a. can increase number of victims at school b. Denying gang presence is worse because then the school is not properly prepared to handle incidents (Arciaga, Sakamoto, & Jones, 2010). 3. Some jurisdictions have laws that allow a parent to remove their child from a school with gang presence. Schools that admit gang presence risk losing students, which motivates them to deny it. Money is also a motivating factor, because losing students can have a drastic impact on the schools budget (Arciaga, Sakamoto, & Jones, 2010). 4. Lastly, some schools do not report gang presence because they have legitimate legal fears of violating privacy laws. This is typically because the administration needs to be educated on the law. Schools, can in fact, share information regarding students involved with gangs to law enforcement agencies and probation and parole. The more that those authorized to share information about students involved with gang activity, the safer the community can be (Arciaga, Sakamoto, & Jones,

Open Document