ipl-logo

Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay

726 Words3 Pages

Did you know that technically churches cannot stop a couple from getting married no matter the gender of each person? It is unconstitutional not to give gay people equal rights as straight people. Some churches would not allow gay people to get married in their church because they didn’t think it was right for them to get married in the Lord’s house. The gay people got tired of it and finally took the churches to state court, and “ the court told the churches that it was a civil matter not a church matter” (Skillen). This example shows that if gay people wanted to get married in a church, then by means let them. They are human beings too. If someone wants to get married to the love of their life, then they should be allowed to marry no matter …show more content…

Did you know that straight people would tell gay people that gay sex had “names, and belonged, if not in hell, in criminal domains.” (Stimpson, 2-3). People thought it was wrong for gay people to have sex and that if they did, they had to be punished for their sin. On the other hand, although many people were mean and rude, some people were nice and tolerant too. But even “some of the nicest and tolerant people felt sex was nauseating and considered it filthy and forbidden” (Stimpson). People acted like they couldn’t tolerate same-sex couples being together. Pretty much people thought it was disgusting for gay people to be together and have …show more content…

In this case, if you look at a gay and straight person’s skeleton would you see anything different from the other? No, you wouldn’t because everyone is the same on the inside so people should have the same rights as one another. The state courts described marriage as one of the “basic civil rights of man” (Snyder). The Constitution says that the right to privacy is a basic civil right, so it’s nobody’s business what couples do. Every couple that is married is with their partner for love and commitment which is why “Marriage is the official declaration of love and to recognize the commitment between couples”

Show More
Related
849 Words | 4 Pages

The resolution for this case could be found depending on whether the petitioners, as free adults are allowed to engage in sexual conduct, exercising their liberty under the Due Process Clause. By this, the court deemed it necessary to reconsider the Bowers holding. The case’s initial statement was, “The issue presented is whether the Federal Constitution confers a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy… ,” 478 U.S., at 190 - informs on the Court’s failure to acknowledge the expanse of the liberty at stake. The laws in the Bowers case sought to control a person’s relationship, whether it would be formally

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

Amanda Stevenson Dr. Woodiwiss PO 101 30 November 2015 _______________________________ On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled any state ban against gay marriage unconstitutional with the case of Obergefell v. Hodges. Ruling in favor of Obergefell, the court’s decision shook what was thought to be the “stable ground” of the United States. Stemming from similar cases presented in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee, Obergefell v. Hodges illuminated two objective questions: “Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex?” and “Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex that was legally licensed and performed

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

Although marriage and civil unions should be recognized under the Full Faith and Credit Clause it was not because this clause was primarily used for judicial rulings and was not thought to apply to marriages or civil union licenses. This deals with the recognition of same sex marriages in states, it also deals with the relationship between states. At the time some states such as New York recognized same-sex civil marriages but whether these unions were recognized in other states was an entirely different story. This went on for a while until it was determined that DOMA was not only discriminatory but also went against the Full Faith and Credit

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

During the 1950s and 60s, society looked down on homosexuality. The general public opinion was that homosexuality was something to be ashamed of and threatening to wholesome family values. In a 1967 CBS News documentary called “The Homosexuals”, anchor Mike Wallace said, “In preparing this broadcast, CBS News commissioned a survey by the Opinion Research Corporation into public attitudes about homosexuality. We discovered that Americans consider homosexuality more harmful to society than adultery, abortion, or prostitution.”

Read More
1192 Words | 5 Pages

David Boonin’s response to Jeff Jordan made great points. Boonin mentions that “marriage involves a public recognition of a personal relationship between two people and people who are married become eligible for various sorts of public benefits that are unavailable to unmarried couples” and that to take this away from homosexual couples makes it into a “public dilemma” (Boonin 247). I strongly agree with this claim, as it is basic to understand that regardless of your gender, race, or sexual orientation, you are entitled as a human to certain rights. It is a discrimination to try and retract this right from anyone because of their sexual orientation. Just as it would be to try and prevent marriages of different races or religious backgrounds.

Read More
2137 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

Hodges”). They emphasized that denying same-sex couples the right to marry was a form of discrimination. The opponents argued that the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman was rooted in tradition and that it should be upheld. They also believe that the power should be left to the states to decide and that the Constitution doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage. At the end of the case Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5-4 decision that the bans “on same-sex marriage and on recognizing same sex marriages duly performed in other jurisdictions are unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution” (“Obergefell V. Hodges”).

Read More
1772 Words | 8 Pages

HIV and its eventual condition, AIDs, is a epidemic that has plagued America since its first discovered in 1983 by the doctors of UCLA. Its catastrophic impact and fast spread was bolstered by many attributes. The reception and incorrect host range led to misinformation that it only affected homosexual white men. The way society acted against disapproved notions allowed HIV to thrive as people kept things to themselves. The government was ineffective and unprepared to stop the virus while religion only made it worse by labeling it as God’s wrath.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

In spite of the fact that a privilege to marry is not listed in the Constitution, the Court said that such a privilege is covered under the Fourteenth Amendment in light of the fact that such choices are vital to our survival and our values. Accordingly, they should essentially reside with the individual instead of with the state. This choice is a conflict with the popular argument that something cannot be an actual constitutional right unless it is spelled out straightforwardly in the U.S. Constitution. It additionally stands out amongst the most imperative models on the general thought of common uniformity, clarifying that essential social equality is basic to our reality and cannot really be restricted on the grounds that a few people trust that their god can 't help

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The federal judge in San Antonio, Texas, “ruled that Texas ' ban on same-sex marriage violates the U.S. Constitution and demeans the dignity of gay couples "for no legitimate reason." Judge Orlando Garcia then granted two plaintiff couples ' request for an injunction barring the state from enforcing the ban.” (Keen 1) One of the couples sought to be married in Texas while the other couple had already been married in Massachusetts, but desired to be recognized by the state of Texas. In Garcia’s ruling, he states that, “the Texas bans violate the guarantees of due process and equal protection of the U.S. Constitution.”

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

We are allowed to voice our opinions. There is separation of church and state, which means that there can’t be laws made about religion. Recently, gay marriage was made legal in all fifty states. However, a judge in Kentucky has denied same-sex couples marriage licenses. It could be argued that if she denied it for her own religious beliefs, it violates the First Amendment.

Read More
1500 Words | 6 Pages

Why should marriage in the state of Texas just be confound between a man and a woman? Many people in the gay and lesbian community are having a constant battle with the Texas government about recognizing gay couple’s marriage licenses. We all have the right to love who we love, but why can’t gay and lesbian community have that same right as well? In section 32 of the Texas Constitution it states that “Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman (The Texas Constitution).” I believe that all gay and lesbian couples should have the right to be married in the state of Texas because the U.S Constitution legalized gay marriage and because it wouldn't really effect anyone if gay couples got married.

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

Until recently, many states within the United States did not allow homosexual/LGBT couples to get married. Due to the fact that LGBT couples have not been recognized

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Marriage is a contract between two people and honestly I think that the society should not be interfering this bond. Not permitting the right to marry another human is a severe violation of the human rights and freedom. James Carville “I was against gay marriage until I realized that I didn’t have one.” The statement is self-explanatory: “You don’t get to judge because you don’t have the

Read More
912 Words | 4 Pages

Substitute the word “gay” in any of those cases, and the terms suddenly become far less loaded, so that the ring of disapproval and judgment evaporates. Some gay rights advocates have declared the term off limits. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance against slander, or Glad, has put “homosexual” on its list of offensive terms and in 2006 persuaded The Associated Press, whose stylebook is the widely used by many news organizations, to restrict use of the word. Miss Suhashini a, lecturer of Phycology Department at UTAR who was currently doing research about LGBT has looked at the way the term is used by those who try to portray gays and lesbians as deviant. What is most telling about substituting it for gay or lesbian are the images that homosexual tends to activate in the brain, she said.

Read More

More about Gay Marriage Persuasive Essay

Related Topics

Open Document