Giblin And Ornati Case Analysis

1321 Words6 Pages

Giblin and Ornati (1974), which argued that affirmative action programs must begin with a census of minority and women employees in each department and within each major job classification, which required having a salary classification system in place and encouraged employers to implement periodic performance evaluations for all categories of employees to make all employees eligible for promotion. Written performance evaluations were also thought to be essential to the successful defense of discrimination suits involving promotions.

Haward Law Review (1989), Legal changes also encouraged managers to treat all employees as career oriented and self-actualizing by creating organizational structures that would allow all classes of employees to pursue promotions, including groups employers previously took to have naturally low aspirations and …show more content…

UNESCO report, (2013-2014) narrates that although all the countries along with local and international NGOs are paying serious attention. However, to achieve this target, more integrated efforts are required which should be directed towards rural poor who cannot educate their children only due to financial constraint. The report further indicates that by the end of 2011, 75million children were still out of school.

Ejaz Ashraf, Mohammad Younis Afzal and Hafiz Khurram Shurgeel, said in their research that Pakistan is facing a major challenge of majority of the children are out of school in the region. A large number of which is females and majority from rural areas. The author concluded that limited availability of public schools near the villages especially girls’ schools in rural areas were the major barrier towards poor female literacy rate. Old teaching methods and schooling facilities were also the common reasons for low literacy rate in rural areas of