ipl-logo

Government Policies Affect American Indians

848 Words4 Pages

Ever since the first contact with European settlers, American Indians have been given the short end of the stick. American Indians have been through a variety of government policies such as allotment and removal. These policies continue to affect American Indians today as many tribes have been reduced to a single reservation that has not even been on their original land that they belonged to before contact. This significant loss in the American Indian community has caused many American Indians to live in poverty, but Indian gaming is a source of income that can help that fact of impoverishment. Because Indian gaming provides a source of income for community funding, the federal and state government should have the same amount of control over …show more content…

In 1988, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act was passed by Congress with the goal of “[promoting] an opportunity to generate needed revenue” for American Indian reservations (364). In addition to classifying gaming into three specific types, the IGRA “also established the National Indian Gaming Commission”, which, simply put, makes sure that not only are the casinos treating the customers fairly, but also that the customers are gaming fairly (364). The National Indian Gaming Commission also ensures that the nobody except the Indian tribes are the main recipients of the revenue that comes from the gaming at the casino (364). While the National Indian Gaming Commission oversees casinos run by tribes in general, state governments only “hold some regulatory authority; specifically over matters that relate to state-tribal compacts” (368). Evidently, these regulations are not made in order limit the American Indians from how much they make from the casino or severely limit their use of gaming as a source of income, but instead it promotes economic development in American Indian tribes living on …show more content…

When the IGRA was passed, it was noted that the act “diminished some aspects of sovereignty to meet the financial and regulatory concerns of states” (364). This included giving a fraction of the revenue to the state government and to comply with the state regulations regarding gambling, such as if the state allows it or not. Sovereignty refers to a self-governing state. With the federal and state government determining exactly how American Indians can approach gambling instead of determining it themselves, American Indian tribes can not truly identify with the concept of tribal sovereignty and self-determination. An American Indian tribe can not truly be considered a sovereign state or a state that practices self-determination because they have a higher power determining how they regulate casinos, defying the original definitions of sovereignty and self-determination. While the regulations on Indian gaming that are established by the federal and state government can be useful, these regulations take away the affected tribes right to control their own economy

Show More
Related
934 Words | 4 Pages

Should Major Casinos be Built in Georgia? An analysis of Jay Bookman's "Five Tells' that Casino Gambling is Bad for Georgia” In this article readers will learn how casinos are bad for Georgia and that senators are deceptive in their practices while trying to get casinos for Georgia. This analysis of Bookman’s article will cover the deception of the name change from casinos to “Destination Resorts”, where Bookman believes the revenue is going to come from, the tax issue for casinos, the effect on jobs in Georgia, and how voters are being taken advantage of.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

“The settler colonial logic of elimination in its crudest form, a violent rejection of all things Indian, was transformed into a paternalistic mode of governmentality which, though still sanctioned by state violence, came to focus on assimilation rather than rejection.” –Patrick Wolfe, After the Frontier: Separation and Absorption in US Indian Policy, 13 Wolfe’s statement illustrates how the US government put more emphasis on legalized absorption of Indians into the White society rather than using forceful and violent methods to acquire the Natives’ land. After the colonization of the westward land and the end of the Frontier era, the US government’s method of assimilation of the Indians started revolving around allotment and blood quanta. With no place to further push the Natives away, the established Bureau of Indian Affairs and the government took action to eliminate the Natives culturally and spiritually instead of physically.

Read More
228 Words | 1 Pages

In order to control even more the natives, another Indian Appropriation Act was passed in 1871. It said that Indian tribes were no longer seen as an indepedent nation but that all Indians were just individuals, like everyone. But also that they were "wards" of the federal government. This obviously made the natives less powerful, because as a tribe, they were numerous so they had more power and they could have treaties with the government. But with the act, it did not work anymore.

Read More
142 Words | 1 Pages

In the 1930s the federal government had put in place a set of policies know as the Indian New Deal. Natives of the Northwest Coast were encouraged to adopt governmental forms and constitutions to establish relations. The government had the final say in how tribes were coordinated, they controlled who sat in chairs of power and how things would be running. Following the 1950s federal policies towards the Indian people continue to vacillate. During the last past two decades of the twentieth century the tribes of Washington have been still making attempts to have the terms of the 1850 honored by the state and federal governments mostly in regards to fishing rights, to bring economic stability to the Native community through the utilization of

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Sovereign Immunity: Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) Summary: The "Seminole Tribe of Florida vs. Florida" case of 1996 centered on the question of whether the state of Florida had the authority to regulate and tax gambling activities carried out by the Seminole Tribe of Florida. The case arose after the tribe began operating high-stakes bingo games on their reservation in 1979, leading to a dispute with the state over the legality of their gaming activities. In 1988, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) was passed by the US Congress, which gave tribes the ability to have gaming activities on their lands under certain conditions. However, the Seminole Tribe continued to face opposition from the state, which argued that they had no right to offer Class III gaming activities (such as slot machines and casino-style games) without a valid compact between the state and the tribe.

Read More
1967 Words | 8 Pages

While some Native American leaders and organizations have criticized Collier's policies as paternalistic and not fully effective, others recognize the importance of his efforts to promote self-governance and cultural preservation. Collier's policies, especially the IRA, laid the foundation for contemporary tribal governance structures and tribal sovereignty. Today, Native American communities continue to face many challenges, including poverty, healthcare disparities, and ongoing efforts to reclaim and preserve their cultural heritage. The legacy of Collier's policies underscores the importance of supporting Native American self-determination and working to address ongoing issues facing these

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

The ability to maintain religious and cultural ceremonies is of vital importance to all tribes, particularly when historically these traditions have been attacked by the dominant culture. Indian schools, prohibitions to speak the native language, and forced relocations have all imperiled the continuation of tribal uses and customs. By further encroaching the tribes upon their sacred lands, it is important to maintain and teach the traditional way of life to preserve their culture. Because the land is ancestral territory, the tribe should enjoy priority in its use. On the other hand, Snowbowl may argue that the public has a right to enjoy recreational activities in areas designated for public use.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

The existence of tribal sovereignty over hundreds of years has sparked the assimilation that the doctrine of American Indians is not only a lawful perception, but also an essential component that defines the evolution of our country. Tribal sovereignty addresses the right for tribes to govern themselves (Internet citation) and for them to mandate their property and their land’s decisions, but if so is the case, why have infinite number of tribes been removed from their territories? Without a doubt, this paper will explore and argue how our country has been affected because of unfair laws and policies that have unreasonably been established to tribes. In order to justify this argument, I will discuss the concerns revolving the Doctrine Discovery,

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

government’s main goal was to displace them from their lands for the sole profit and benefit of the American people. This notion was achieved upon the Indian Removal Act of 1830, issued by President Andrew Jackson himself. Jackson admitted that though the general policy was to civilize the Natives, the government was also keen to “purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness” (Doc 4). The wilderness, in this case, would be the designated Indian Territory west of Missouri and the Arkansas Territory (Doc 7). This territory was leagues away from the various tribes’ homelands, one tribe even being removed from the southern tip of Florida.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

Indians were being surrounded a whole nation and not willing to give up their life style and costumes, relocation was best option in order to stay alive and take care of their culture. During the late 1820s a number of small “civilized tribes” had become a part of American society; some have moved into cabins, houses, and even mansions. After the Indian Removal Act of 1830, there was great unpleasant experience among the Indians who decided to remain on the natural land and way of life. Some of the Indians rejected the money given by Americans for their land. They stated that too much of their land had been taken already in the past 20 years and would defend and die for the land if it was necessary.

Read More
335 Words | 2 Pages

In the novel, Shell Shaker, it is evident to the reader the importance and influence of race on the plot line. LeAnne Howe uses her characters and their stories to critique notions of racism against Native Americans, but also to challenge those notions by representing Choctaws in a different light. LeAnne Howe’s critique of racism towards Native Americans can best be seen in the storyline of the D’Amato brothers and the Casino of the Sun. The article Indian Casinos captures the racism and extreme measures of inequality that many Native Americans experience through the works of casinos taking place in their home. The article also states how the casinos revenue is then controlled by non-Indian corporate financiers (Indian Casinos, 1).

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Under the jurisdiction of the National Indian Gaming Commission, Native American tribes have the authority to regulate Class II gaming. Class III gaming consists of all forms of gaming that that Class I and II exclude. They are legal on Native American lands

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

Native communities, historically, have struggled economically compared to those of other races nationwide. So, some tribes decided to search for alternative sources of income to boost their profile and diversify their investments. One of the ideas tribes had was starting gaming operations. This idea became reality in some tribal communities with the opening of bingo operations and casinos. Today, the true effects of gaming facilities on tribal land is debated, with the consensus leaning towards minimal benefits.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

Many tribes had cultural ties to the environment itself. When the Americans established the Indian Removal Act, the Native Americans were forced to leave these cultural grounds. Those who refused to leave their original homeland had to conform to the ways of colonial life instead

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

No, how the natives are currently taking care of this situation is completely fine. In the history of Indian Gambling the US government has had a huge hand in the activities that occur. In the 1970’s tribes were allowed to open up bingo halls and in hopes of raising additional funds (English, Casinos are a Benefit). Once seeing that the Natives were accumulating money the government tried to make a stop from them making anymore money.

Read More

More about Government Policies Affect American Indians

Related Topics

Open Document