ipl-logo

Gun Politics Pros And Cons

1640 Words7 Pages

In discussions of Gun Politics, on the controversial issue has been eradicating the 2nd Amendment. On the one hand, the Left argues that guns are linked to violence, and the country would be better off banning all guns. On the other hand, the Right contends that it’s the people who use guns in the wrong way are the ones that should be held responsible, and society as a whole should not be held accountable for the actions of a few. My own view is that they the country should put more guns in the hands of civilians so that it would make the criminals think twice about starting violence. Gun politics have been debated for decades but it wasn’t until recently that it became one of the leading issues. Through examining both sides of the argument, …show more content…

This idea includes the passing of Gun Laws that would strictly regulate the process of buying guns. One subset of this proposition is creating background searches that ensure the mentally ill cannot possess a firearm. Of the options for more gun regulation, this one is by far the front-runner. Even though some gun regulation laws are sound ideas there are many that would pose the potential to hurt this nation. Another gun regulation law that has been brought up is the banishment of all high powered weapons. Although this would prevent murderers from dealing mass damage it compromises the sole reason the second amendment was created. “The right to bear arms” means the right to own weapons for the purpose of defense. In 1776, this meant citizens could own muskets which was the weapon of choice at that time. In today’s society it should be interpreted the same way which means that citizens have the right to own the same weapons that the military uses. This refers back to the fear that one day our government might become tyrannical and try to seize power from the citizens. By allowing the people to house the same guns that the military uses it ensures that our citizens would have a fair fight if they ever needed to rebel against a tyrant. Although many

Show More
Related
381 Words | 2 Pages

Passing gun control legislation that creates a universal background check and gun database system as well as passing mental health legislation that improves the health care system’s protocols and policies for assisting people with mental health disorders and that enacts counseling programs in communities and schools will decrease the likelihood of mass shootings in schools. The United States is bitterly divided. Issues of great concern, such as the rise of mass shootings, are partisanized. Both sides of the debate will not comprise or listen to what their opponents have to say. Groups from both sides can only agree that one innocent life taken from gun violence is one too many.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

In This Book Not like Us; Immigrants and minorities in America 1890-1924, which was written by Roger Daniels; a professor who taught History at the University of Cincinnati, focused on the 3 different groups, the Blacks, Immigrants, and Amerindians. He also focuses on the "Opposing forces" hostile to them, also seeing the different paradoxes of the supposed advancements that actually were conflicts in this period of time. This book covers everything from women's rights to the 1924 Act, so enjoy the ride. Much of this book Not Like Us is more devoted mainly to the Blacks in America and the Amerindians. In Daniels analysis this material is key, but it has very little relevance/applicability to the immigration reformer.

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

(Bitto 2). Changing a constitutional right would be a slap to the face of the founders of this great nation. Many other authors feel the same. “The second amendment states that citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.” (Bitto 20).

Read More
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Gun control has been a hot topic for a very long time. Within the Bill of Rights there are the ten most important amendments to the United States Constitution. Among these is the second amendment, in which it is stated that, “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, should not be infringed. ”(Kates, 2005, pp.12) Guns are part of every citizen’s daily life.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

Were you aware of the, quite frankly horrifying fact that there is an average of one mass shooting per day within the United States of America? Or that, despite the population of America being only approximately 4.2% of the world population, we, as a nation, possess nearly half of the world’s civilian-owned firearms? Firearm-related legislation is almost always controversial, and has been throughout the United States’ past, ever since the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States was ratified on 15 December 1791. The Amendment was inspired by William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, in which he stated that, to paraphrase, the right to bear arms under English law is in reference to the “natural right” of resistance and self-defense against tyranny and oppression. While this may have been considered to be a possibility during that era, there are many reasons why this is not so today.

Read More
87 Words | 1 Pages

In this article they discuss the pros and cons about the gun legislation. As the article says some of the pros can be the safety of the people. Some of the cons can be that it violates or it depreives them the right of the people to bare arms. There is no potential bias as the article gives the two points of views. This article can be helpful as evidence for my argument as well as the opposing argument since it shows the two points of

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

A gun is a controversial topic today. Day by day the mass shooting news is displaying on the television. If we glanced at the recent news and the earlier, The Mass shootings only happen in places where there are no guns allow like school and church. Majority of the people believe that firearm is self-defense for them, while others claim the opposite. I will articulate about the second amendment; people kill people, not a gun, strict rules and regulation for the public.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

There are sixty four thousand seven hundred forty seven gun stores in america, compared to the mere ten thousand eight hundred forty three. Guns have become so accessible to anyone. Many question whether civilians should be allowed to own and carry firearms. As stated in the Second amendment we are allow the right to bear arms. So the government can’t touch our firearms.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

In the United States, the Second Amendment protects the right to “bear arms”. The Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution. Amendment Ⅱ). This means that a strong military is a necessity for a safe country and household, so dictating the people’s right to own firearms is considered unconstitutional . Self defense and hunting are the most common reasons for owning a weapon in the U.S. Although this Amendment declares restricting firearms unconstitutional, it is nationally debated whether the use of weaponry is a collective or personal matter.

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

The second amendment is needed in the society that we live in today. It would cause a lot of trouble if people tried to amend the second amendment. I understand that the trajectory for the right to bear arm is becoming narrow and people are starting to see an issue with it. But, I believe that there are different things that can be enforced that will prevent some of these issues. Thomas Jefferson stated, “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Gun control challengers will argue that the 2nd amendment was not only put in place for self-defense but to guarantee that the nation will not be overrun by any military power. Guns are used for self-defense purposes more than 2 million times a year, that’s 3 to 5 times the estimated number of violent crimes committed with guns. They also believe if the United States military were to be beaten by a foreign power; the only national defense left would be the American people. If the government took the citizens guns away they would not be able to defend America from foreign powers or from any other challenger.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

According to the NRA “It is a simple fact that violence relating to firearms in the nations most recent history has been a problematic issue. However, the regulation of gun violence is not only dependent on the regulation of firearms, but of the humans capacity for free will and deviant behavior.” This shows that humans in this world have the power to go out and buy a gun and use it however they want to. After the mass shooting in Florida there has been many walkouts over gun control and most of them want to take guns away and that is just wrong. According to the second amendment you have the right to own a gun for many good reasons.

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

When this was added to our constitution the colonists were afraid of the red coats invading so they needed it to fight them off and defend themselves from the British force. Times have completely changed since then we are no longer trying to fight of red coats from our backyards or afraid of Native Americans attacking us. Even if we were to at some point be attacked by a tyrannical government or army I’m pretty sure they would not waste their time and money on ammo and going door to door, but they would probably use an atomic bomb or something. But this would probably never happen because we are slowly advancing and have become more civilized with a democratic government instead of a monarch. Those that oppose gun restrictions most commonly use the reasoning of how it is needed for protection, but in reality do you really need a semi-automatic for someone that may just want to steal your

Read More
1208 Words | 5 Pages

Although the second amendment states all americans have the right to bear arms crime statistics show that we need tighter gun control to lessen the widespread shootings. Gun violence has existed in america

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

It is widely known and accepted by those in favor and against gun control that the Second Amendment in the Constitution clearly states an individual’s right to own guns. This was established by the founding fathers as a means for citizens to defend themselves against violence and/or tyranny. While some may argue this is an antiquated and unnecessary law, the Supreme Court has also sustained this amendment today as constitutional and adequate. Every law-abiding citizen has the right to feel protected against those who pose a threat to their safety. As stated in the article by Trevor Burrus “Face It: Guns Are Here to Stay”, “Even if the government enacted a massive program to confiscate these weapons, the feds would fail in their task and frighten millions of Americans in the process.”

Read More

More about Gun Politics Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document