ipl-logo

H. J Mccloskey On Being An Atheist Essay

1533 Words7 Pages

After reading H.J. McCloskey’s article entitled “On Being an Atheist”, I believe that the main point he was trying to make was atheism is a more reasonable and comfortable belief compared to that of the Christian faith. There were three different proofs from which McCloskey attempted to build his case. The three proofs that he used were the cosmological argument, the theological argument, and the argument for design. McCloskey also brought up in his article the problem of evil in the world and he even went as far as to claim that it is not rational to live by faith. McCloskey claimed that proofs do not necessarily bring people to a belief in God. He stated in his article, “ most thesis do not come to believe in God as a basis for religious belief, but come to religion as a result of some other reason or factor.” (McCloskey 1968) However he made it clear that he believes that the three most commonly accepted proofs by theist are the cosmological argument, the theological argument and the argument for …show more content…

Now at this point it is important to understand that McCloskey did at least consider these arguments as reasons that move ordinary theist to theism. (McCloskey 1968). This is not always the case with people and by actually considering these proofs as reasons that move ordinary theist to theism he contradicted the previous statement he made where he claimed that all theists do not hold to these proofs. So it would seem that any attempt to try and debate or use these arguments as reasons to not believe in God would simply be a waste of time. So why would McCloskey want to dispute or debate these arguments if theist according to him already do not hold these arguments as reasons for their faith? It would seem that his motives were not pure and all he wanted to do was start a fight and answer questions that no one was interested in to begin with. This article seems to be very objective

Show More
Related
757 Words | 4 Pages

The debate was immense for several reasons, one of utmost importance is that it meets the assertion that Christianity can be reasoned logically and rationally. In this debate, Thomas Warren uses the same tools of logic and rationality employed by atheists and agnostics to respond to and defeat Anthony Flew

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

I thought this was his most powerful argument because the reasoning can only be refuted by altering the monotheistic idea of god or giving sufficient reasoning for all of the suffering in the world, which is no easy

Read More
2566 Words | 11 Pages

McCloskey believes that the argument is unsatisfactory in the belief of the existence of God and he uses the theory of evolution for his explanation of why the earth came into being. McCloskey claims that this argument has no such “indisputable examples” and that they are needed to get the proof going. He also calls this “very conclusive objection.” and claims that one cannot legitimately argue from this sort of evidence (McCloskey pg. 64). McCloskey, claims he is an atheist does not believe there’s a designer. Evolution is based on a Charles Darwin and primarily difficult to understand because there is not actual proof of the earth that from once a ball a fire turned into such beautiful and unique creation.

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

God can be best defined as, “the unique, independently existing, omnipotent, omniscient, morally perfect creator of the universe” (Cray 04/12/2017). The difference between theists and atheists is that theists believe in the existence of God, whereas atheists believe in the absence of God. Focusing on the arguments presented by philosophers Robin Collins and William Rowe, and their responses to the ideas of theism and atheism, we can further analyze the evidence to support or negate the existence of a higher power. Collins opens his argument observing that life would have been impossible if certain laws of nature and physical constants had been slightly altered. He then goes on to compare the universe to a biosphere that is made up of the

Read More
1636 Words | 7 Pages

This seems to be a bit hypocritical of his point of view considering he continuously argues against Christians not having any solid proof that God exist. However, there is no definitive evidence that the big bang theory or even the evolution of humans exists but McCloskey (1986) believes they did. McCloskey (1986) also claims that the presence of the imperfections and evil in the world argues against “the perfection of the divine design or divine purpose of the world”. With knowing that the teleological argument is not a hundred percent conclusive about God, it makes it a difficult subject to approach McCloskey about. However, God made the world and humans in hopes to follow and love Him.

Read More
1626 Words | 7 Pages

And finally says that the faith that believers have is different than the faith of scientists in their facts (Schloss). Coyne does pose interesting arguments in favor of separation of religion and science but fails to recognize the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (things in the world move to disorder and not to order), the lack of evidence for multiple universe creation attempts, and how having faith in evidence can be different for both faith and

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

However, this argument is not a good objection against the free-will argument. Theist argue that though it is possible for a human being to do only good through their lifetime this is highly unlikely without divine intervention which in turn would no longer be free-will. It does slightly undermine the free-will defense with the small possibility that it is possible for human beings to only be good throughout their entire

Read More
2349 Words | 10 Pages

As a counter argument it is faulty, and ultimately fails to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the traditional God exists and has an adequate reason for evil. In a court of law, the burden of proof falls onto the prosecution to prove their claim beyond a reasonable doubt while the defense counters their position by establishing some doubt. The prosecution can be seen as Craig as he claims the existence of a God, whereas Sinnott-Armstrong’s atheism only exists in relation to theism. Atheism is a response to theism but theism is an idea in itself, independent of atheism. In other words, without theism atheism would not exist, as such without a claim made by the Crown the defense is not needed.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

Jones. Only foundation for atheist for not having faith in Gods is that they believe there is a deficiency of faithful indication, Atheists debate if God is present then why evil subsists? Why hurt or loss? Why suffering? Mackie point is if Holy Being subsists as well as is a presence that is completely good, all-powerful, all-knowing, then there shouldn’t be reality of evil, and theists would not discard that Holy Being is completely good, omnipotent, and omniscient and along with that they believe in the existence of some evil.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

There are similarities and differences between Atheism and Christianity. Atheism is the belief that “There is no God” and everything is the world was created over years and years without any Gods. In other words, Atheism is a disbelief in the existence of God. However it is also known that Atheism is not a disbelief in Gods or denial of Gods, but it is a lack of belief in Gods. In general, Atheists believe that there is no God.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

I enjoyed reading The Five Proofs of God by Thomas Aquinas. This reading describes the five arguments supporting God’s existence. The first proof deals with the idea of motion, and states that if something moves it has to be moved by something else other than itself. However, if something moves without the clear distinction of what has caused it to move the original source of motion must be God. The second argument supporting the existence of God is based on efficient cause.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

This paper will touch upon these points and will demonstrate that the atheistic outlook can most certainly contain hope and consolation, simply in different ways than that of theological outlooks. Richard Dawkins contributes to this argument with a scientific and logical perspective on the idea of hope and consolation within the atheistic outlook. In order to argue against and disprove the statement that the atheistic outlook provides no consolation or hope, Dawkins seeks to also criticize and disprove the ironic reasons that believers claim to have hope and consolation. The first point Dawkins makes to this concept of consolation is “religion’s power to console doesn’t make it true.” Many believers make the claim that God is a psychological factor wired into the human brain, religion and God is a psychological necessity for the human brain and is emotionally essential for humans to function happily.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

In thousands of years of Christian, thinking there have always been many questions. One of the most common questions asked is the proof of God. There are several proofs for the existence of God but most are quickly discredited by science and atheists. In the recent years of Christian thinking, there have been proofs that science and atheists have been unable to prove. These proofs are attempting to prove the existence of God.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

The infamous new Atheists have taken this form of argumentation and use it to argue for the merits of atheism over theism. This is a development that seems to be rooted in this new militant form of atheism, and goes something like this: If atheism is true, then I will have freedom and intellectual honesty, and it won’t matter if I’m not a Theist, because God doesn’t exist. If a good god does turn out to exist, he will forgive me. On the other hand if I’m a Christian, I must be sexually and morally constrained, and believe in a God I find to be morally abhorrent.

Read More

More about H. J Mccloskey On Being An Atheist Essay

Related Topics

Open Document