I enjoyed reading The Five Proofs of God by Thomas Aquinas. This reading describes the five arguments supporting God’s existence. The first proof deals with the idea of motion, and states that if something moves it has to be moved by something else other than itself. However, if something moves without the clear distinction of what has caused it to move the original source of motion must be God. The second argument supporting the existence of God is based on efficient cause. This argument is caused by a sequence of causes that creates a final source, for example the first thing is the cause of the next and inevitably creates a final outcome. Because the chain of causes cannot go back infinitely the cause must be God. The third proof deals with possibility and necessity. This explains …show more content…
There are things in the visible world that are good and there are also things in this world that are bad. For example, the greatest origin of anything is the cause of everything that relates to it. The author gave a great example in this reading, they state that, “fire, which has the greatest heat, is the cause of everything hot” (350). I find that example to be a clear way of describing the evidence for this claim. The fourth proof focuses on the theory that everything perfect in this world must be caused by a supreme entity, which would be God. The final and fifth proof deals with how things are directed. This evidence focuses on how something reaches a goal, because most things operate for an end goal. This theory claims that these things reach their goal only from directedness from God. Humans who are unknowledgeable of the future are guided towards a goal by a knowledgeable being, God. In the reading by Gottfried Leibniz, the main focus is the free will of man. If men are free to choose what they want they can choose to be good or bad, but if God is all powerful he must control the actions of