ipl-logo

William Craig Cosmological Argument

1022 Words5 Pages

In William Craig’s ‘kalam’ version of the cosmological argument he argues that “the universe has a cause of its existence.” His argument relies on two crucial premises which state that “whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence” and “the universe began to exist” (Craig). In this paper, I will begin by breaking down Craig’s take on the cosmological argument. I will then propose an objection to his argument that questions why there must be a cause of the beginning of the universe, and furthermore, why this cause must be God. I will conclude with a response Craig would give to this objection. Craig validates that his argument, “the universe has a cause of its existence”, is true by assuming the initial premise that everything that …show more content…

He defends this argument by providing the example of the Big Bang theory, which disproves the possibility of actual infinities in time. Craig appeals to modern science when he refers to the Big Bang theory in his argument. This theory explains how the universe began according to science. By accepting this theory, one is accepting the fact that the universe did begin to exist at a specific point in time. Therefore, the past has an absolute start point and cannot be an actual infinity. Given that Craig assumes the two premises “whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence” and “the universe began to exist” are true by providing justifiable explanations per statement, he comes to a conclusion about the universe. He concludes that “the universe has a cause of its existence” and that the cause of the universe’s existence is God …show more content…

The Big Bang was an event in time that occurred when nothing had yet existed. It was the cause of the universe, it sparked existence. Here the opponent would continue to question that if nothing existed in the world before the Big Bang, then what would make it necessary for something to have somehow existed to cause it? Before this point in time, there was no existence or sign of life yet, so why is it necessary for Craig to say that a greater, almighty power must have caused this coming into existence of the universe? Why couldn’t the beginning of the universe be just that- the beginning of the

Show More
Related

Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

590 Words | 3 Pages

Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause of existence His defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument revolves mostly around the second premise. This is mostly due to him finding the first premise as intuitively obvious, where he claims that “no one, seriously denies it”. From experience, we find that physical objects do not come into existence without causes.

Read More

H. J Mccloskey Response Paper

2566 Words | 11 Pages

McCloskey differs from the belief of the teleological argument and claims “to get the proof going, genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed” (McCloskey pg. 65). The argument shows that the universe exhibits an order of design and infers that its cause, therefore, must have a Creator. (Evans & Manis pg. 77) The cosmos is in a precise order and it has reason to why the earth came into existence the way it is.

Read More

Review Of Samuel Clark's Argument For The Existence Of God

1137 Words | 5 Pages

According to Samuel Clark’s argument, things exist the way they are in order to show the existence of God. All things need an explanation for their existence according to Aristotle. For instance, why the earth is spherical, why different places experience different climatic patters, why different geographical areas have different time zones and why do creatures that are in found in different places have features that enable them survive in such conditions. These considerations lead to a belief that there must be a cause for the universe (Rowe 67). At the same time, this cause needs to be extremely perfect for the universe to align itself in its current manner.

Read More

Mccloskey Argument Analysis

2663 Words | 11 Pages

In the article, “The Absurdity of Life without God”, William Craig argues that if there really is no God, life would have no purpose. I loved this article so much I printed it out and have it kept in my office for other people to read. When one truley pieces the story of God together, it really is the best explnation for the universe. It is just not plausable that the expanision of the universe caused a “big bang” of all life, matter, in the perfect peice. The earth is the perfect distance from the sun so that we don’t burn up, and is perfect distance close so we don’t freeze.

Read More

Saint Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

871 Words | 4 Pages

The objection addressed the validity of the argument which had the premise 1, nothing is the efficient cause of itself except God and premise 2, a chain of causes cannot be infinite. The argument thus concludes there must be a first cause. This conclusion agrees with my thesis that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God

Read More

Richard Taylor's Cosmological Argument Essay

1307 Words | 6 Pages

Richard Taylor’s Cosmological Argument consists of many aspects that explain conditions in which God, the universe, the earth and all the other planets, and the living beings of Earth, exist. As Taylor stated there is really only a sufficient reason as to why something exists in which he follows up by stating that the universe requires an explanation as to why it exists. This means though people who don’t really think about why the universe does exist or how it exists, but there is a reason as to how it came to be or why it exists. This is where sufficient reason comes in. It helps give an explanation to something that exists.

Read More

Comparison Of Aristotle And The Cosmological Argument

914 Words | 4 Pages

If God does not need a cause of existence, why would the universe need one? Therefore, stating that God does not need a cause, contradicts the whole cosmological argument. If God must exist for the sake of having the universe, there must be a cause for god too. To argue the idea that you need a final cause for motion, there are many physical events at the sub-atomic quantum that have no evident cause. Besides these new scientific discoveries, why couldn’t there be more than one final cause?

Read More

Thomas Aquinas First Cause Argument Analysis

1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More

Cosmological Argument

462 Words | 2 Pages

In Newton’s first law, he explains the law of inertia by stating that an object at rest stays at rest unless acted upon by an outside force. This law can be applied on a wider scale to the creation of the universe because put simply, in a chain of events, there must be a beginning that acts as the catalyst to the entire sequences of occurrences. The cosmological argument rests on the first event in the history of the universe because that initial beginning dictates whether there exists a self-existent being. The universe is filled with dependent beings but for those beings to be capable of existing, they are contingent on the existence of an uncaused cause.

Read More

Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More

Denigration Is A Term Used In Both Classic And Cyberbullying

382 Words | 2 Pages

Denigration Meaning: Used in both classic and cyberbullying, denigration is a term used to describe when cyberbullies send, post, or publish cruel rumours, gossip and untrue statements about a target child to intentionally damage their reputation or friendships http://bullyproofclassroom.com/10-most-common-cyber-bullying-tactics https://www.google.com.au/search?q=denigration+cyberbullying&oq=d&aqs=chrome.2.69i59j69i61j35i39j69i59j69i60j69i57.2111j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Denigration is a classical and cyber bullying, and it is a term used to describe why bullies send, post or polish cruel rumours, gossips and non-true statements. They target most to child to intentionally damage their reputation or friendship.

Read More

Kalam Cosmological Argument Analysis

1381 Words | 6 Pages

Born in 1949, the Christian philosopher and theologian, William Craig is most known for his defense of the Kalam cosmological argument. The Kalam cosmological argument is rooted in Islamic theologians of the Ilm al-Kalam tradition. The Ilm al-Kalam also known as Islamic natural theology attempts to justify the belief in God by constructing arguments for God’s existence. The main specificity of the Kalam is that it relies on the premise that the universe began to exist. Craig’s main argument is against the possibility of existence of actual infinities he believes there is always a cause of existence.

Read More

Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

1784 Words | 8 Pages

The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

Read More

Dao In Chinese Buddhism

764 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, the universe has to have come into existence from an ultimate source, and this source is referred

Read More

God's Not Dead Analysis

915 Words | 4 Pages

Dominican philosopher and theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas, created the “Five Ways” of God’s existence – motion, causation, contingency, gradations, intelligence of design – in which the first two are cosmological arguments. Aquinas’s argument from motion states that it’s obvious some things in the universe are moving, and if they’re moving, something else must have caused them to move, and something else must have caused that to move… and so on. However, the pattern of movements can’t go on forever since there wouldn’t be that one thing that started the whole series. Therefore, there must be an “initial mover, an extraordinary being that started the universe moving but is not itself moved by anything else – and this being we call God,” (Vaughn, Lewis. Pg. 65).

Read More

More about William Craig Cosmological Argument

Related Topics

Open Document