ipl-logo

Han Dynasty Compare Contrast Essay

717 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negatives of the han dynasty

In order for any empire to be ruled well, there would have to be specific details to that rule. Characteristics of a well-run empire includes, constructions, trade increases, cosmopolitan cities, effective bureaucracy, communication, justice system, and citizenship. In the Han Empire there was many inventions and creations in order to run the empire. Horse-drawn carriages showed great improvements in both appearance and construction techniques. In Eastern Han Dynasty, they added on to the horse-drawn carriages and made it into double-shafted horse-drawn carriages. Single wheeled barrows were invented and commonly known and used in the Eastern Han. It was easy to handle and could be used on different types of surfaces to carry both people and …show more content…

The ruler of the empire decides all of this. The emperor is in charge of laws and armed forces. The emperor had 3 councilors of the state (Chancellor over Masses, Imperial Counselor, and Grand Commandant.) Due to the emperor being such a high head of the people he served as Chief Executive Official. In the Han Dynasty all people were Chinese, so all spoke Mandarin Chinese. To communicate between one another they all would write standard scripts to facilitate and the Chinese would send expeditions to the West which brought communication between the Eastern and Western Han. With the empire being so humongous, there needed to be laws and systems. The emperor began to extend the Han rule in all directions. Relied on conscripted labor, state revenues, and taxes on land in order to help the empire maintain its power. Legalism was still a technique that was being followed with everyone by the government and when one doesn’t follow any rules given then he/she would have to face unusual and/or cruel consequences. All people of China shall receive some type of right of course. The emperor has right to rule the entire population, if only he treats properly and follows the basic principles of good

Show More
Related

Compare And Contrast Han China And Rome

196 Words | 1 Pages

pro They development overarching set and they had to obey china. While law was in the official language,bcal language were used allowed language. The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty also

Read More

Compare And Contrast Ming And Han Dynasty

492 Words | 2 Pages

During this period of time the Ming and the Han were able to improve their way of having a government. The Ming were able to solve this problem by not having the government add harsh and strict rules, this also improved by showing compassion towards their citizens, they also split their government into functional sections in order to help them prosper. And due to having other new governments they were able to use some of their ideas like making the ships and boats move a lot faster than usual. But for the Han government was able to prosper by establishing a new political system, they also followed the ideas of Confucianism by believing that their ruler was a father over them and they should not be lead by force. The government officials were told to be honest.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Fall Of The Han And Roman Empires

581 Words | 3 Pages

During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Roman And Han Empires

564 Words | 3 Pages

Empires throughout history have all had their own methods to political control. Some very similar others could not be any more different. Some of the great empires such as the Han and the Roman had very similar approaches to political control. Although both the Han and the Roman empires had similar forms of government both bureaucracies, both empires had many individual characteristics as well.

Read More

Why Did Rome And China Attempt To Unify Their Empires

787 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the history of The Roman Empire the government has changed elected consuls to powerful emperors with intent to overall better the empire. Comparatively, China’s empire was constantly adjusted from a simpler bureaucracy to a censorate appointed to provinces, which lead it to be argued as the most unified empire. Rome and China attempted to unify their empires both similarly and very differently because of the different structures of their governments and the culture flowing through the empires. The Roman and Chinese had similar ideas of having a bureaucratic based government to centralize the people under the rule of the emperor like the censorate in China and senate in Rome. On the contrary, those political structures were both

Read More

Similarities And Differences Between Imperial Rome And Han China

708 Words | 3 Pages

Political integration between both empires had both similarities and differences, most notably being different with the ways they chose those to rule. In Imperial Rome, bureaucracy relied on local elites (landholders) and the middle-class citizens to control provinces. Imperial Rome was far less complex, compared to the bureaucracy of Han China. Many official positions within the government were bought or became hereditary through family wealth as opposed to earned by merit, due to this fact, the Roman bureaucracy often suffered from poor governance. One of the reasons the empire was so unified even

Read More

Similarities Between The Qin Dynasty And The Tang Dynasty

279 Words | 2 Pages

The essay will compare and contrast government between the Qin dynasty and the Tang dynasty. Both Dynasties have a great influences in Chinese Dynasty History. First of all, the Qin was the first dynasty of imperial China, lasting from 221 to 206 BCE. Its founder was Qin Shi Huang Di, who created the title “Huang Di” and this title was wildly used by later dynasties. During the Qin period, the administrator was seeking to create an imperial state which was consolidated by highly centralized imperial power and the ruler put heavy tax to support military power.

Read More

The Importance Of The Comanche

1190 Words | 5 Pages

According to Ancient history Encyclopedia “An empire is a political construct in which one state dominates over another state, or a series of states. At its heart, an empire is ruled by an emperor, even though many states in history without an emperor at their head are called "empires". At its core, an empire is the domination of one state by another.”

Read More

Differences Between The Roman Empire And The Han Dynasty

1525 Words | 7 Pages

The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.

Read More

Han China And Mauryan India Comparison Essay

703 Words | 3 Pages

Buddhism had an impact in both empires. However, Confucianism was the official ideology upon the entire Han Dynasty. Their values focused on a system of philosophical and “ethical-sociopolitical teachings”. Han China accented political control around the education of bureaucrats to make more logical decisions. Maurya India, on the other hand, was essentially a Hindu state.

Read More

Comparing Qin Shi Huangdi And Caesar Augustus

1096 Words | 5 Pages

But, of course, they do. Both the Chinese and Romans are guilty of this because they do not want to lose their power. This weakens the idea that Qin and Caesar are preferable rulers than their predecessors because they still have the same amount of power. The people still do not have a voice and that’s why their ideas and policies did not last forever. Eventually with the right amount of protesting, the people always get what they

Read More

Is America An Empire Essay

824 Words | 4 Pages

An empire is defined as a powerful group of nations, territories or people ruled by a single authority, especially an emperor or empress(Dictionary.) There were various Empires that existed in the early centuries of the developing world. The Muslim empires such as the Ottoman, Mughal, and Safavids, were all very powerful and had a lot of achievements. They flourished due to their government, military power, and leaders. Although they were very successful, they dealt with many rises and falls.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Qin Dynasty And Han Dynasty

1233 Words | 5 Pages

The Qin and Han Dynasties were similar in that they both believed in a strong centralized government, which strengthened and unified their empires, but they differed in that the Qin followed the strict Legalism while the Han followed the more flexible Confucianism, and the way they interacted with outsiders; the Qin tended to be more defensive of outsiders while the Han were more interactive and wanted to build relationships with foreigners. First, the Qin and Han Dynasties believed in a strong centralized government. The implementation of a strong centralized government led to the success and growth of their dynasties. The centralized government creates a pyramid of power and influence, with the main leader, the emperor, on top.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Ottoman And Ming Empires

312 Words | 2 Pages

Zhu Yuanzhang led a very strong and powerful army to take control of the Yuan Dynasty and they were successful. That led them to gain power. They consolidated by trading and it was even more beneficial to them since they were in Asia and near the water so it was easy for them to use boats to travel and trade. They also secured their borders from their enemies by building the Great Wall of China. They managed to maintain power by allowing everyone in the empire freedom of religion and fair rules and they had good economic income from trading.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Chinese Dynasties

1274 Words | 6 Pages

Different periods throughout China’s history have different names, known as dynasties, for the diverse positions within its society. Theoretically, all of the periods are similar, with the government and military officials ranking high in the hierarchy, and the average everyday people being under regular Chinese law. Throughout China’s history, the society has been organized into a hierarchic system of socio-economic classes, known as the four occupations. The four occupations system seems to have become distorted after the commercialization of Chinese culture during the Song Dynasty. Even though the social rankings within the country are not as predominant as they once were, the people living within the country still know their “place” within the society.

Read More

More about Han Dynasty Compare Contrast Essay

Related Topics

Open Document