Do you believe that students should be graded on their handwriting? Some people think that handwriting should be graded to look nice. But, handwriting should not be graded just because it is sloppy. Teachers all agree no one’s handwriting is perfect and that it should not be graded. People think that handwriting should be graded because the teachers need to read it. I believe it is not necessary that handwriting should be graded at a young age because of Grammar, Spelling, and organization.
First, according to National University, handwriting should not be graded because of Grammar at a young age. “Grammar affects handwriting at a young age, which eliminates it not being graded.” (http://www.Debate.org/) This shows that grammar can not
…show more content…
For example, (Debate.org) explains,” Handwriting is not graded because spelling is more important.” This shows that spelling would not be able to be handled in kids handwriting. Students should not be graded on their spelling which is part of handwriting. In conclusion, handwriting should not be graded because of their spelling.
Finally, all teachers feel that proper organization is also more important than handwriting. For instance, National University explains, “Organization is another reason why handwriting is not graded.” This shows organization would not be able to be controlled in student’s handwriting. This is important because it shows organization would be graded on student’s writing. The opposing thesis is not valid because they think that young kids should have the proper Grammar, Spelling, and the organization. I disagree with them because they think that kids should have the proper handwriting which includes Spelling, Organization, and Grammar, but kids are barely learning. I am right because handwriting does not really matter because it does not have to be perfect it just has to be readable, this is why I disagree with the opposing