Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Healthier school lunches
Summary of healthy school lunches
Summary of healthy school lunches
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Healthier school lunches
Summary of healthy school lunches
Summary of healthy school lunches
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Intro Name: Natasha Torres In the nonfiction article, “ Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by McClatchy-Tribune News Service. This article is about how the first lady wants to change school lunches to be healthier for children although the school nutrition do not like her campaign. Michelle Obama’s program should be banned because the school’s lunch is already healthy enough for example, some people are grossed out by the school lunches, some are disappointed, and some say parent can not be trusted.
In the article, “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by Rice William, the author question whether our school lunches are healthy enough. He discusses the Hunger-Free Kids Act, a campaign originated from first lady, Michelle Obama, in 2010 to help fight childhood obesity, which affects 1 in 3 Americans . It can escalate into diabetes and heart disease, which can make a childs life worse and cost the nation millions.
Determining the healthiness of food being served to students during school lunches is a very important subject. Although eating healthy is important it should not be the only factor contributing to whether or not taking away students favorite school lunches is beneficial. I don't believe that it is a good idea to take away students favorite school lunches and replacing them with all healthy foods is a good idea because of these three reasons. One, the cost of the healthier food, two, the student environment and mood of the school, and three, the fairness to the students whose only meal is the lunch they receive at school.
How the Healthy-Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010 Changed American Views of Nutrition In 1991, the USDA announced the Eating Right Pyramid. It was made to be a visual representation of what a person’s diet should consist of as recommended by the federal government. This so-called food pyramid received criticism before it was ever revealed and long after. Despite this, it would serve as the model for the United States for 20 years until the advent of MyPlate in 2011.
The food at the school is not very good. Yes, it is edible but not very tasty. Not only food but students need time away from school. So they can relax and get ready for the second half of school.
For all the cuts that have been made to school foods, six percent has not been a big decrease. School lunches don’t provide any nutritional value for the kids. The purpose for a school lunch is to provide kids with a dependable lunch that has good proportional amounts and nutrition value. The obesity rates need to drop higher and faster in the next ten years if they want to make cuts out of our meals and the meals need to be proportioned to size.
Look back at what you ate at school and ask yourself if it is healthy. Is there healthy alternatives to school lunch? Is there a variety of choices to choose from? Are there any vegetarian choices for the students? These are just some of the basic questions you would ask yourself when thinking about the risks of school lunches.
It is spending money that we don’t have for a lunch with fruits and vegetables that we just throw away (4)”, students do not want just spend their money on food that is not even the half of the food they used to get in the previous lunch program, counting the price the lunches are higher and students are not happy with it. In addition, some students are choosing to get junk food, because the new federal lunch program do not appetize them “it was kind of ironic that we are downsizing the amount of food to cut down on obesity but kids are going and getting junk food to fill their hunger (6)”, so even if the federal is trying to involve the students to eat healthy, students would always pick the option more accessible for them, and that will fill their
(Cavendish) School lunches provide nutrients which gives energy for them, for their later classes, and most school lunch is known to be more of a lunch than the junk food being eaten at
During a week they have their meal at the school cafeteria, but that meal is harmful for students' health. So, students need to avoid unhealthy kind of food, if they want to be healthy. One useful reason to change school menu, that can be good for students' health, is that they would get more useful vitamins for their health. It is very important to have enough vitamins in the body, because it can protect students from different sicknesses. Vitamins help students to have better performance at school, because they receive useful components to their bodies.
“But her school lunch control regulations, which were passed in the name of healthy eating have been an utter failure” (Gonchar). The Healthy and Hunger- Free Kids Act was supposed to gives kids a better school lunch, yet it has failed. The ultimate result was that kids are not eating their lunches and money is being put to waste. “It’s great that schools are trying to make school lunches better, they’re not doing a very good job about it, starving kids at school isn’t exactly a way to get kid’s obesity down” (Arit John). Even though school are trying to make improvements the steps they are taking are actually worsening the situation.
“Today approximately 16% of America 's youth are classified as obese,” in that case, changing one meal a day could prevent as much as 6% of America’s youth from becoming obese. The main issue in the cause to start making school lunch the healthy option of a students day is the undeniable fact; people love debilitating foods. Even when you are an infant in the womb, the one, only thing you crave is sugar. The best
In schools today, students have forgotten the importance of eating healthy. Changing the lunch menu in school cafeterias to healthier foods would result in a positive outcome within your school. Although you want to cater to your students and provide the food they desire, you need to think about the benefits that changing to a new menu would bring. Healthy foods stimulate the brain which would ultimately result in better academic performance in the classroom.
It is healthy because kids favorite such as beef taco and orange chicken only has 3g of fat as it is in the nutrition label. Also because they give you an variety of fruits, vegetable, and meals so you can get a lot of nutrition there are 3 different options in most schools such as ours. Also school lunch is more healthier than home lunch. In the text it states, “We found that packed lunches were of less nutritional quality than school lunches," said lead researcher Alisha Farris, a Ph.D. candidate at Virginia Tech University.” This shows that you are better off sending your child to eat at school because you know it 's going to be healthier than most home
One, it gives you energy for the day, and it is said to improve how you perform in school. SFgate says, “It is important to refuel children's glucose supplies with a healthy lunch. A healthy lunch can give children the energy they need to stay focused, pay attention in class, and learn the information presented to them in their classes after lunchtime.” Eating healthy when we are young, is very important when we are older as well. If we eat unhealthy habits when we are young, than we might have unhealthy habits when we are older.