ipl-logo

Hills Like White Elephants Rhetorical Analysis

681 Words3 Pages

Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” contains hidden, deeper meanings which are full of conscious and unconscious psychological processes. Hemingway represents in this piece, by explicating the text to explore the domineering ways of relationships, setting, imagery within the piece, and essentially abortion. In “Hills Like White Elephants” the American displays the manipulative and domineering side of relationships illuminating that the “couple” within neglect to realize the majestic gift; instead, they have childlike arguments about the “White Elephant” in the room. In “Hills Like White Elephants” the couple tends to use factors of manipulation to get what they both want. This not only affects their unborn child since neither of them ever really acknowledge the baby as a possibility. Even the girl, in acting like she is going to get the abortion because he wants her to, she never really talks about the child like she wants it, or mentions why a baby would …show more content…

They are two separate beings, that just like being together, But now they are starting to see what really make oneself happy. This helps aluminate on all the other forms of doubling. The use of doubling shows how Hemingway tries to convey there are 2 sides to every story, thus there are 2 different paths that one can choose from. Now since Jig and the baby is coming as a pair. It used to be that the American and Jig were the pair, but now that the American does not want the baby he and she must decide if they want to add another life into their pair or go their separate ways. At the end of “Hills Like White Elephants” it states, “He looked up the tracks but could not see the train”(Hemingway 478). This is interpreted that when the American looked up the tracks he could not see any future with Jig, since she wants a separate life since she wants to settle down and have a “real” relationship instead of just “try new

Open Document