ipl-logo

How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson An Autocrat

437 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: President jacksons take on the indian removal

Andrew Jackson: Autocrat or Democrat? Andrew Jackson was an autocrat because he executed actions that benefited him and not the people. Andrew Jackson was an autocrat because of “Indian removal doc 1”, the map, and “Indian removal doc 2”, the “Memorial of the Cherokee nation.” The map showing the long trails that the native Americans had to take proved that Andrew Jackson was an autocratic leader because the trails tortured the people and did not benefit them. When an action harms people or is not the common will of the people, it makes that action non-democratic. The “Memorial of the Cherokee nation” claimed the Native Americans did nothing wrong and they would lose all of their memories if they were transferred to an unfamiliar place. This proves the move was against the Native people’s will. When an action harms people or is not the common will of the people, it makes that action non-democratic. …show more content…

The cartoon by Thomas Nast was created to show that the spoils system was corrupt. The definition of an autocratic leader is “a person invested with or claiming to exercise absolute authority.” Corruption is usually used so that the leader always gets their way, so the spoils system made Andrew Jackson an autocratic leader. In the advice that Van Buren gave to Andrew Jackson, it stated that the person Jackson wanted to appoint would be bad for the people. The reason Jackson wanted to appoint the person was because that person supported him in his campaign. Eventually, The person ended up stealing a monumental amount of money. This proves that the corrupt spoils system made Andrew Jackson an autocrat because his supporter only harmed the people so appointing him was

Show More
Related
276 Words | 2 Pages

When Andrew Jackson became president, he introduced the spoils system. This practice replaced government officials with the winning political party’s supporters. Jackson thought that the spoils system was democratic because it prevented government officials from the opposite party from becoming a powerful aristocracy. The spoils system was made famous from the speech given by Senator William L. Marcy of New York. To criticize Jackson’s political appointments, Senator William replied, “To the victor belong the spoils of the enemy.”

Read More
1886 Words | 8 Pages

Jackson received harsh criticism for acting without the consent of Congress since he had gone beyond the scope of his constitutional authority. During this era of his reign, he is behaving as though he is the king and is obstructing every other thing. Jackson was the first president to declare that the president is the most important democratically elected official in the country and to greatly expand executive power. Furthermore, Jackson had engaged in the Spoils System and Rotation of Officeholders during his presidency. The Spoils System addressed a method of having favoritism towards a person or group.

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

In conclusion, President Andrew Jackson was not Democratic because he wanted everything his way, and he was very strict about a lot of things like the Bank Veto Message, his message to congress in Document 6, and the Indian Removal

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

Rennie Combs US History H Mr. Hertel-Therrien 2/16/23 Was Andrew Jackson Democratic Andrew Jackson was known for many things. He was a general, war hero, politician, and man of the people. But was he truly democratic? This essay will prove that Andrew Jackson was not democratic. Being democratic is defined as “a way of governing which depends on the will of the people” (The Council of Europe).

Read More
360 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson was an autocrat. Reasoning for this is that in the image of Andrew Jackson the first it shows him dressed like a king complete with a crown and scepter. Kings are made to rule and have absolute power. The definition of an autocrat is a ruler with absolute power. Also, in the pictures border it says “born to command” and usually when you command you give an authoritative order which sounds like something an autocrat would do.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Jackson the Autocrat Andrew Jackson was an autocratic leader. He is an autocratic leader because of the Indian Removal, Spoils System, and National Bank Controversy. During the Indian Removals, Jackson showed to be very autocratic. In the “Indian Removal document 1” and “Indian Removal document 2” Jackson has shown to be very autocratic.

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

Most of the people Andrew Jackson hired were those who supported what he was doing and those who believed in the same ideas as him. The people hired started to abuse this power they were granted, and it did not benefit anyone except for themselves. The spoils system might have kicked out wealthy men that were well educated and had great ideas, and replaced them with commoners with not much education and skill in helping to run the states. By using the spoils system, it showed one way Andrew Jackson was not a strong leader to the United

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Colby Magoon Mr. Mullen US History_CP1 02 May 2023 How Democratic was Andrew Jackson? Did you know that Andrew Jackson was not a democratic ruler? Andrew Jackson has done many non-democratic actions including removing the Native Americans from their homes, having slaves himself, and allowing Starwort to steal millions of dollars from the government funds. It has been discussed by many people that Andrew Jackson was not democratic, and it should not be up for debate because of his actions.

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson: Autocrat or Democrat? President Andrew Jackson was an autocratic leader because of the actions within The Spoils System, The National Bank Controversy, and The Indian Removal. Andrew Jackson stole from Native Americans that the nation had been in peace with for almost a half-century, gave office jobs to unqualified thieves, and put social and economic classes against each other, for his own personal benefit. Andrew Jackson displayed autocratic behavior based on Indian Removal Documents one and two. In the Indian Removal document one, there is a map that displays where Native Americans were taken from and where they ended up, depriving them of their home and natural territory.

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

Because of these infringements on the rights of the people, Andrew Jackson was not a champion of the common man; the nickname “King Andrew,” from his opponents was accurate. When he was elected president, Andrew Jackson felt that he needed to remove John Quincy Adams’ appointees from office. To him, the clear answer was to replace them with his own followers and friends, creating a government where only one political party was effectively represented by presidential appointments. This use of the spoils system put people who were not qualified in powerful positions simply as a reward for supporting Jackson. He also had thirteen unofficial members in his cabinet to advise him.

Read More
440 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson: Autocrat or Democrat In my opinion President Jackson was an autocrat because he forced Native Americans out of their homes,created the spoils system, and wanted less power for the bank. He wanted all of this for his greater good. He made it like he was their king and he had overall power. President Andrew Jackson created the Indian Removal process to get rid of all Native Americans so he could have his society his way.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

The founders of the United States did their best to create a government that would not allow erroneous decisions to greatly harm the nation. They set a percent of presidents being politically sound and well-known; their beliefs for how the nation should be handled were essential to their campaign. President Andrew Jackson, however, did not follow this system, instead winning primarily by his personality and popularity amongst the common American. While his actions in office often appeared to be for the people, most had a hidden selfish side to them that he easily covered up. With the election of 1828, Jackson radically changed American politics, focusing them more on public appearance and personal character than on intelligence and political views, making personality just as, if not more important than the actual politics of a political term.

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, there is much evidence to support the idea that Andrew Jackson was a tyrant and vastly abused his power in presidency. Jackson was a cruel ruler for his actions, some including the Indian Removal Act, his overuse of vetoing, and his temper and personality. Overall he was just not right for the position of a political

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

He started by replacing many government jobs to officials with his supporters”. This is a major reasons why Jackson was bad. He would be considered an absolute Monarch or King. An example of this is when the Supreme Court sides with the Indians against the state of Georgia, and jackson ignores the supreme court’s ruling. The “spoils system” corrupted the government because no one had a chance to get good at their

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson was seen as a common man the voice of the people by some. By others he was King Andrew, trampling the constitution and instigating tyranny. Jackson’s presidency impacted democracy, through his use of the veto power, and his claim of Clay creating a “corrupt bargain”, which is not a turning point for a rise in democracy despite him giving white male suffrage. During Jackson’s use of executive power weakened voice of the people.

Read More

More about How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson An Autocrat

Related Topics

Open Document