ipl-logo

How Did Albert Beveridge's Political Cartoon Protest Colonial Imperialism

1128 Words5 Pages

Those who favored colonial expansion and the foundation of foreign colonies had different justifications for believing so. There were those who believed their race to be the superior race, and that because God had given them the gifts of knowledge and land, it was their mission to educate and govern the inferior races. Albert Beveridge, a former Uniter States Senator in the late 18th century, was a strong supporter and defender of imperialism. Using religion and divine right to justify the taking over of other nations, Beveridge claimed that God had given them the means and power to reach out to inferior nations and spread the ideals of Christianity. He even went so far as to state that it would be immoral and selfish of the American people to rise to this call of expansion. Beveridge also explains that these lesser nations do not have the right to decide how they are governed because that freedom of …show more content…

Not to mention the damage the European agriculture and construction have done to the native species. One might receive the same message when looking at R. C. Bowman’s political cartoon titled, “Joseph Chamberlain mounts a new gun.” This image depicts the English leader of foreign policy, Joseph Chamberlain, firing different guns labeled, “extermination,” “conciliation,” and “intimidation” from a cannon labeled “parliamentary majority.” Bowman created this image to convey the message that imperialism cannot be justified by the claim that it seeks to civilize underdeveloped people, because, in their efforts to “civilize” them, the English invaders are doing nothing but killing countless native people. Not only are they killing natives, this image suggests that anyone in the battle for “civilization” is at risk of being killed, this includes the

Show More
Related
1679 Words | 7 Pages

would have to govern them as dependant since they cannot self-govern, while Beveridge believed they would benefit the U.S. economy and trade. Carnegie did not want to maintain the Philippines as a colony because the U.S. would then have to be armed and ready to fight and protect the Philippines from foreign invasion, however once again Beveridge believed the U.S. should do the opposite of what Carnegie had said, and wants to maintain colonies abroad. Albert Beveridge and Andrew Carnegie had different opinions about what the United States should do when it came to imperializing other nations; Beveridge believed that the United States should join other imperialistic nations and imperialize smaller nations, while Carnegie believed the United States should not imperialize. The time period during this conflict of ideas between Carnegie and Beveridge happened right as when the

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

Many Americans thought occupying foreign countries, like the Philippines after the Spanish American War, was a bad idea because it contradicts the American values of equality found in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. (Doc D) However, a majority of America sided with people like Senator Albert J. Beveridge who believed people were chosen by God to expand into China and the Philippines to open more Asian markets. (Doc E) This was a continuation of past expansionism because acquiring land for money Manifest Destiny have been motives for expansionism for

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

The Natives believed that the Europeans are “edgy, rapacious, and remotely maladroit.” Sure enough, the settlers in Jamestown kenned little about farming and found the environment baffling. It was conspicuous that the colonists needed the avail of the Natives. Despite their inexperience the English dominated the Indians. From “the beginning the Virginia Company indited that the relationship would ineluctably become bellicose: for you Cannot Carry Your Selves so towards them but they will Grow Discontented with Your habitation.”

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

What were Beveridge's economic motives for imperialism? Beveridge’s economic motives for imperialism derived from industrialization and the current economic growth America was already witnessing. This was the period where industrialization was growing at a rapid pace not only in the United States but worldwide. He made the case that the opposition was correct in resisting imperialism in the past because there was no need for new land back then.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Beveridge believe that we should just be able to do what other country can do, while Obama focuses on what would be best for the country; basically staying out of wars when they can be avoidable. Beveridge’s response to why we should imperialize other countries is not necessarily how it’s beneficial to our country, but more of its “fair” and we’d be more “equal” to other countries since their governing foreign countries as well. He believes that since we can do it, we should just expand our territory. He thinks that Americans should continue with the march toward commercial supremacy of the World, not even considering any of the outcomes. His strong nationalism is only focusing about the power America can get by doing what every other country may be doing, imperializing.

Read More
1321 Words | 6 Pages

However, there were the people who thought that American expansionism

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Imperialism is the term used when a country expands its current power and influence through diplomacy or military force throughout other lands and countries that are weaker than their own. Some motives of imperialism is, economic reasons, like industries need resources, and customers to sell to. Another reason would be military factors, and nationalism. Imperialism in the US hasn 't been a failure. The goal was to increase the country 's influence, territory, power, and belief.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan, the proper study of mankind is Man”(1-2) writes Alexander Pope in his metaphysical poem, An Essay on Man, where he mainly argues that man should not pry into God’s affairs but rather study himself, especially his nature, powers, limits, and frailties. According to Pope, mankind, being between God and beast, continuously seeks and hovers about profound, fundamental truth of itself. Converse to Pope’s idea, the arrogant king Ozymandias, featured in Percy B. Shelly’s poem “Ozymandias” ultimately shows the king’s extreme self-confidence, hubris. Both Pope and Shelly show mankind’s incorrigible fate and hubris, which will eventually lead to mortality and trivial ending. Furthermore, through the modern example, Steve Jobs, one can see that hubristic action exists in these days.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

In being an anti-imperialist the worrisome is not that one opposes the idea of expansion of religion, commercial, and constitutional. It’s that with the annexing of these tropical islands would come to a result of the American system of self government would be that America might abandon this idea that makes America that nation it is to this point. Three reasons why the U.S should avoid imperialism is because it fails to follow that criteria of the constitution, could lead to tyrants like behavior, and could lead to conflict One argument that can’t be missed is the fact that the constitutions sets forth a principle that states “consent of the governed” after further research this means that to imperialize and annex other islands would violate

Read More
277 Words | 2 Pages

Ecological imperialism is a theory that was developed by Alfred Crosby that says European settlers were “successful” in colonization because of their introduction of animals, plants, and diseases that were not native or found in original native lands. However, it was the “success” of the colonists that led to declines and suffering in native populations. Crosby believed that this is what led to major shifts in the ecology of the colonized areas and declines in the indigenous populations. In the United States and Central America, ecological imperialism affected the native populations in destructive ways. Notably, in Central America, ecological imperialism is considered a catalyst in the collapse of many native populations due to the superior

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

This quotation is an excellent example of how european colonists, or at least Spanish colonist, did not want to exterminate natives. As for other european colonists they may have intentionally killed natives, but it was all for the sake of expanding their empire, and their killing were not based in racism or prejudice against natives. In fact, most of the natives were given a choice to assimilate into european

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

Furthermore, the cartoon also implies that the world’s population would end up suffering due to imperialism as it resulted in the depopulation, loss of culture and negative impacts on non-Europeans many years after the contact had

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

In the beginning, many Europeans “justified” their colonization by their desire to spread Christianity to African lands. On the other hand, many Europeans justified their domination by several rationales which describe how they are the superior race fit to rule. It is important to note that the Europeans wanted to benefit their homelands by the cash crops and cheap labor found in Africa. The colonial era of Africa by European powers was officially incited by the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) which gave rise to the “Scramble for Africa” which divided the continent among European powers in an official manner. (Gellar 1986,122)

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

The fault lies on “those people”, meaning the colonised population, ”who cannot perceive the wisdom of coming under our sceptre” (L.20), that is to say they will fight against their invaders. In one sentence, Mr Gladstone ridicules the notion of the white man’s burden, or the 3C, as spread in British

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

People normally react negatively to anything labelled or regarded as ‘being a new tool of western imperialism”. Explain what you understand as ‘western imperialism’ and briefly discuss some of the reasons linked to this form of reaction. You may cite your own examples. (10 marks) Western Imperialism is a policy of gaining power over other nations by seizing their territory you’re dominating by means of technology advances, military advances excreta.

Read More

More about How Did Albert Beveridge's Political Cartoon Protest Colonial Imperialism

Related Topics

Open Document