More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of carnegie in industrialization
Carnegie and the industrial revolution
Role of carnegie in industrialization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The response to poverty in the Gilded Age was the rich and the poor not being able to come to an agreement in response to those who can hardly make ends meet. Andrew Carnegie was one of the wealthiest men during the Gilded Age. Carnegie was not the best man to work for because he was against labor unions and approved using violence against his own employees. In “Andrew Carnegie, The Gospel of Wealth” It talks about how the rich and the poor could come together if they had the “proper administration of wealth.” Carnegie thought it was better to build institutions instead of give to the poor because the strength of the mind and body will benefit the community while solving the problem between the rich and the poor.
Andrew Carnegie and Samuel Gomper have different takes when it comes to the role that wealthy people should have in society. The two authors have opposed feelings toward the poor people being in the state of condition that they are in. Although their views are different what they are proposing in both documents can help the poor people. Carnegie’s The Gospel of Wealth focus more on what the wealthy people should do with their wealth to benefit the society.
The industrial revolution was picking up steam, and these men mastered novel business tactics to triumph. The systems that had kept people in poverty were beginning to deteriorate: those born poor could now achieve wealth using hard work, skill and dedication. The business men of the gilded age devoted themselves to their industry as if it were their religion, routinely living a life strongly
During the Industrial Revolution big businesses took places of small workshops, increasing to quantity but not quality. This made many people lose their jobs, and now there was only one place to work the factories. Ahead of these factories were big business owners, some born into money others worked their way up to it like Andrew Carnegie. Work at these factories became unsafe and the pay was bad, they could only blame one person and that was the owners.
Andrew Carnegie was the one who wrote the Gospel of Wealth and it was a positive idea for the people who are not wealthy. Carnegie says that the upper class has a responsibility to address the issues of the wealth inequality. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie stated that the wealthy class can be a better state than the government or state. Carnegie also states that the wealthy should dispense wealth and it should be a way that does not promote drunkenness. Carnegie argues that there are two types of wealthy people.
Carnegie, known to have lived in New York (where most of the big businesses are today), wrote “Wealth” for the North American Review in 1889. Carnegie, himself, was born into poverty. He was not given his wealth, but worked hard to acquire it. It is honorable to mention that before he wrote about the problems between the social classes and what should be done about them, he experienced both sides. 2.
In the primary source document “Wealth and Its Uses” the author Andrew Carnegie explains the problem of proper administration of wealth. He believes that the bind between the rich and the poor to create a harmonious relationship is still possible but the distribution of surplus wealth needs to be addressed and fixed. Andrew Carnegie explains that one of the duties of the man of wealth is to consider all of his extra wealth as a trust fund. That in which he should give back in a manner that he thinks is the best way to benefit the community. This document was written because Andrew Carnegie noticed the problem with the distribution of surplus wealth and wanted to see a progressive change.
During the industrial revolution, leaders of industrialism were brilliant, innovated, and ambitious men who rejuvenated the American economy decades after the Civil War. Andrew Carnegie is one of these industrial leaders who had a positive impact on society. He is considered to be a true “captain of industry” (Shi, "Robber Barons") , not just because of the businesses he developed, but because of his desire to better society for all people and not just for himself (Shi, "Robber Barons"). Carnegie believed that those of mass wealth should make a moral choice to make it their responsibility to share their wealth for the utilitarianism of society. 1.)
In Carnegie’s “The Gospel of Wealth,” he argues that the affluent have a unique responsibility to help others by aiding the lower class. He does not, however, promote simply handing money to the poor. In a way, the wealthy should act paternally. He believes that it is the responsibility of the wealthy to provide
Underpinnings and Effectiveness of Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth” In Andrew Carnegie’s “Gospel of Wealth”, Carnegie proposed a system of which he thought was best to dispose of “surplus wealth” through progress of the nation. Carnegie wanted to create opportunities for people “lift themselves up” rather than directly give money to these people. This was because he considered that giving money to these people would be “improper spending”.
He believed that if the wealthy don't give back some of their profits to the community, they are living a dishonorable life, and although I didn't necessarily agree with this radical viewpoint at first, I now am a firm believer in Carnegie's argument about wealth.
In a study conducted in 2013 by The Economic Policy Institute, a financial think-tank devoted to analysing the ebbs and flows of the national economy, it was documented that while the average Massachusetts one-percenter grossed an annual household income of $1,692,079, the average ninety-nine percenter grossed a household income of only $56,115 which leaves us with a vast wealth gap of $1,639,964. It also states that the cumulative one-percent takes home nearly a quarter of all the income in the state. This is a perfect example of what it means to be gilded because although Massachusetts prides itself on its economic success, it’s evident that while the ninety-nine percent are becoming poorer, the one-percent are getting richer. This type of income inequality has existed in America for a very long span of time and was one of the main reasons that the first “Gilded Age” was considered “gilded” in the first place, according to the PBS.org’s “Andrew Carnegie: Rags to Riches timeline” Andrew Carnegie, one of the poster boys of the “golden” aspects of the “gilded age” due to his rise from immense poverty to extraordinary wealth, grossed in a grand total of nearly $25,000,000 in 1890 while the average public school teacher earned $256. This just further proves that we’re living in modern gilded age because although we 've improved the state of income inequality since the first gilded age, it’s still a big problem that affects us on a global
During the late 19th century, there was a growth in industrialization. This brought new opportunities for the poor and the rich. For example, Carnegie helped build the steel industry in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, which made him one of the richest man in the world. As Carnegie gained more wealth, he questioned who money should be given to. Carnegie was both a Robber Baron and a Captain of Industry.
Andrew Carnegie makes it clear that people in society with wealth should help those who deserve the financial help. If those in need of help put in their effort, then why shouldn’t they be helped by those who don’t need it? In the Life of the Average Coal Miner, the harsh conditions that children faced is revealed. Children would work for hours in a crucial and dangerous environment and be rewarded with very little money that did not equal to the amount of work they put in. It is unfair to those who worked in the conditions in the Life of the Average Coal Miner.
Andrew Carnegie was a “robber baron” as shown in the way he acted towards the people who helped him reach the top and the terrible working environment that he subjected his workers to. He did various things in an attempt at overshadowing the awful things he did and positively alter his public image. His mentor, Thomas Scott, taught him the skills he would use to become the undisputed king of steel. Costs were the most important aspect of any business and reducing those required cutting wages, demanding 13 hour days and utilizing spies as a way to thwart possible strikes. Many years after Carnegie had gone out on his own, Scott met with him thinking that the years they spent together and all he had taught him would unquestionably result in help in his time of trouble.
