Yes Andrew Jackson could win the Presidential Election of 2020. He could win because, many people had admired or respected Jackson as a patriot, a self-made man, and war hero. (448) This means people liked Jackson for how he was a war hero meaning he was devoted to his country. Adding on, Jackson was very popular, he was most known for the "War of 1812", in this war he led his troops that defeated the Creek Nation tribe in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend and later defeated the British in the battle of New Orleans.
Winning against John Quincy Adams by a landslide of votes, Andrew Jackson became the new president in 1828. In addition to being a popular president, Andrew Jackson was the seventh. Not only was he a president, but also a military hero. His two terms were filled with many activities, including duels. A controversial topic after his term was how democratic Andrew Jackson was.
Based on my research of Andrew Jackson, the question of if Jackson could win the presidency in 2020 it's clear. In my opinion, I think that Jackson could lead the Nation to success, and make improvements to the Nation. There's no reason that he will not make mistakes, but the majority of his decisions will be good. According to the thinking map, "Jackson laid the framework for democracy, paid off the national debt, gained new lands for America strengthened relationships with foreign nations globally issued a new currency", these were the actions that the ex-president did in his time, and it shows how he could lead very well a whole Nation. Also, Jackson made a few mistakes, such as the Indian Removal Act.
President Cleveland or even any another person would be a better candidate then Andrew Jackson, for the simple fact that Andrew Jackson promoted slavery and even had a 150 slaves him self. I’m also sure that I don’t have to mention the Indian Genocide Andrew Jackson led, which is known as the Indian Removal Act that was supported by Jackson all the way as a matter of fact he was the main force behind this cruel campaign. Which ultimately lead to the trail of tears which is basically where 46,000 Native Americans where forced to go west in the worst conditions possible, which is where more then a third of their population died because of exhaustion and
There is evidence and proof that Jackson has mistreated a certain group of people like the Native Americans and has not been considerate of other opinions on things like the National Bank. Many
Audience: The audience that Gregory of Tours is trying to reach is anyone who will listen to his story of the Frank family. It could be any of the general public in the town or outsiders. Similarly, he is trying to reach generations to come; therefore, they know the good and the bad of the kings before them. Purpose:
Andrew Jackson ran for president in 1828, and won. President Jackson organized new bills that made the country happy. He also honored all of the nation's rights. Andrew Jackson depended on slavery and treated the Native Americans very badly. Jackson believed that the they were vanishing very fast from diseases.
This is the second time that Jackson ran against Adams, the first time being in 1824 when Adams won. The first six presidents, unlike Jackson, were men from the east, wealthy, and educated. While Andrew Jackson was from the west and was self-made, he declared education was unnecessary for political leadership. He was committed to remaining a man of the people, he defeated the British at the Battle of New Orleans, which gained him the title of a national hero. Jackson also relied on his ‘kitchen cabinet’ and created the spoils
The founders of the United States did their best to create a government that would not allow erroneous decisions to greatly harm the nation. They set a percent of presidents being politically sound and well-known; their beliefs for how the nation should be handled were essential to their campaign. President Andrew Jackson, however, did not follow this system, instead winning primarily by his personality and popularity amongst the common American. While his actions in office often appeared to be for the people, most had a hidden selfish side to them that he easily covered up. With the election of 1828, Jackson radically changed American politics, focusing them more on public appearance and personal character than on intelligence and political views, making personality just as, if not more important than the actual politics of a political term.
This supports my claim, because the truth is that Jackson was trying to be more democratic by including the common man more instead of just the rich and powerful, he felt the anger of the common people because he had come from there, so he decided to treat the common people with more equality instead of just being rich and powerful. This is important since Andrew Jackson finally started the process of democracy in our country, which as we know left a huge impact on us, as today we have a thriving democracy. While he vetoed the bank for its unjustness toward the common man, it caused a lot of upsets, such as people making cartoons with Jackson’s face over a king calling him tyrannical, and saying he is abusing his power as President, it wasn’t all sunshine and rainbows for Jackson, but he played a major role in building the early steps for our democracy today. Before Jackson was president of the United States, he had come from humble
He had a harsh temper and his personality was just not fit to be in the position of president. Jackson was said to be better for the Army and military and that he just wasn’t really capable of the duties of being president. He even said himself that he was not quite made for president. “I know what I am fit for. I can command a body of men in a rough way, but I am not fit to be president.”
In the end, it is my belief that Jackson has to be looked at from a non-biased perspective. As Sellers pointed out, interpretations that Whigs and Progressives have about him are not wrong. There is just a need for more information on the topic. As Sellers pointed out at the end, the Jackson era is filled with controversy and the multiple viewpoints from historians “suggests that we are poor in the data by which our hypotheses must be
Jackson always “fought for what he believed was in the interests of the common man”(source 1, paragraph 7). He didn’t win his first election, which was in 1824, and “forever referred to his stolen election as a ‘corrupt bargain’”(Source 1, paragraph 5), but won the second election in 1828. Going from literally 0 to 60, he was ordinary with nothing and then became one of the most important people in the country at his time. While he was president in 1828, he was judged for a lot of things that happened throughout his whole career. That didn’t faze him though, he still had an immense will to do whatever he felt was right.
In addition, the last reason is that it was said that Jackson had a bad temper and was a troublemaker when he was a teen and during early adulthood. With Jackon creating disagreements with his decisions, acting the spoil system which was corrupt and kicking out people from their jobs, and having a bad temper and being troubled he doesn’t seem to care for the people and doesn’t deserve to be considered as “A Man of People”. Andrew Jackson treated the Native Americans horrible, which isn’t something “A man of the People” should have done. In the article “Jackson Treatment of Native People” it states, “In 1818, Jackson further persecuted native people when he led a war against the Seminole tribe for harboring enslaved people who had
Coming into the courtroom I believe Jackson was a vicious president who just wanted to kill to get his way, but in the trial, I came to the consensus that Jackson isn’t always that angry old man people perceive him to be. Sure, he’s killed many people and could’ve possibly led to many more deaths, but his crimes against humanities was never fully brought to light. I believed, that prosecution proved that he was an immoral, violent and at times vicious president, but they never proved he committed a large enough crime to affect humanity. In the opening statements, prosecution called Jackson a president that failed to do his job.
