This angered the Russian citizens which led to the Russian Revolution of 1905. On January 22, 1905, approximately 150 workers were killed by soldiers who fired on peaceful protestors, led by priest, Father Gapon, in Saint Petersburg. This event was known as Bloody Sunday and signified the beginning of the Revolution of 1905. Subsequently, several radical groups formed an alliance and organized several mutinies and strikes against the Russian autocracy. Left with no choice, Nicholas II issued a manifesto on October 30, 1905 that granted more suffrage rights, got rid of arbitrary arrest without a trial, and provided for an elected legislature.
From 1928, when the plan started, to 1932 to its end, many factories, dams, power stations and even cities were being built. Despite there being harsh penalties implemented to workers for failure to meet their targets, there was still a significant increase in Russia’s industrial growth in a very short period of time. Just like the emancipation of the serfs in 1861, under Tsar Alexander II, in protest of Stalin’s policies, the peasants, in protest, refused to work harder than they needed too, causing them to destroy livestock and crops, which eventually lead to their unnecessary death. Stalin, just like the Tsarist autocratic regime, was not committed to collectivism but preferred capitalism in his ruling of the Soviet Union. This caused a lot of rebellion from the Kulaks who opposed collectivism.
“The czar refused to listen to demands for political change and in October, a general strike occurred as workers in the railways, industry and the banks stopped working” (document 3) A strike occurred because the czar didn’t listen to political concerns. This shows how unpleasant people were with the government. This can lead to the overthrow of the Russian monarchy. In document 3 it states, “...when a peaceful demonstration of 200,00 men, women and children in front of the Winter Palace in St Petersburg calling for reform was ended by the police and troops guarding the palace” Many people were unhappy with the Russian government and the fact the police were involved suggests how the government was willing to use force to stop political
In the early 1900’s the Russian people had become angry at the way the Russian monarchy (Tsar Nicholas II) had handled foreign affairs and how he was treating his people unfairly. They had many protests, one in 1905 and two in 1917. The revolution in 1905 overthrow the absolute monarchy and put in a provisional government. No one really listened to the provisional government, so they overthrew it again in 1917. These revolutions and acts of disobedience led to many unnecessary deaths of innocent people.
The Tsar, once again sitting atop the social order putting daily pressure on the overworked proletariat. After a brief few years of general satisfaction from the people of Russia, the resentment for the Tsar steadily grew again as shown by the statics in Source 5. Between ‘1910’ – ‘1914’ the number of political strikes grew from merely 8 to 2401. As recorded by Historian William C. Andrew in Source 3, the “Czar will never again be safe in the midst of his
On the way to losing the war against japan in the far east, czarist Russia was wracked with internal discontent that was turned into violence in St. Petersburg in what was known as bloody Sunday. On January 5th, 1905, father Gapon led a large group of peaceful workers into St. Petersburg. The large group wanted Nicholas II to improve working conditions and establish popular assembly. Tsar Nicholas’s II troops opened fire on all the workers, killing more than a thousand people on bloody Sunday (history, staff. History.com, 2009, bloody Sunday massacre in Russia).
In other parts of Europe there had been many peasant revolts and though they were quickly distinguished, they became an inspiration to other peasants. In fear of a rebellion, Tsar Alexander II used imperial power to free all serfs in Russia. Serfdom in Russia was also the scapegoat for many of the problems plaguing Russia at the time including food shortages, overpopulation, and the backwardness of Russia. After many debates among the government officials concerning what would be best for the serfs once they were freed, they came up with an agreement. Serfs were allowed land, but the wealthy landowners got the best picks and ex-sefs got the leftovers.
4 out of 5 Russian were peasants. They were no social mobility meaning the peasant were confined to their unfair social status. Additionally, famine were happening throughout the countries since the peasant and working class were treated poorly and undoubtedly exploited. The tsar had
The Massacre sparked protests and demonstrations leading to the 1905 Russian Revolution which brought about a huge shift of power. The once autocratic government, then became a constitutional monarchy. In response to the Russian’s poor performance during the Great War along with the increased strain in relation between the Czar and his subjects, came the Russian Revolution of 1915 \(https://www.britannica.com/event/Russian-Revolution-of-1917). The Soviet Union also known as the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics in its prime occupied 15 countries including, Kazakhstan and Armenia (https://www.britannica.com/place/Soviet-Union). Similarly, the American Bloody Sunday which saw the country’s African American community brutally beaten and bitten by police dogs in what supposed to be a peaceful protest for their rights as citizens of their country.
As the strikes increased, tsar Nicholas II had responded to the plead of the working class with the October Manifesto. In the book, “Major Problems in the History of Imperial Russia”, by James Cracraft, contains a document titled, “The October Manifesto of Nicholas II, 1905”. This document was Nicholas II response to the Russian Revolution of 1905, as it addressed the basic civil rights to the people and the creation of an elected parliament which was known as the State Duma. In the beginning of the document, Nicholas states that the riots are causing the nation despair and to obliged with theses riots and disturbances, he will unite the government. “We believe it necessary to unify the operations of the higher government.
The ‘Bloody Sunday’ massacre was to a large extent the cause of the Russian Revolution of 1905. The massacre caused an eruption of social disorder and public outrage and anger caused people to strike, to show their discontent towards the massacre therefore causing a revolution. However, the 1905 Revolution could have been caused from the frustrations and humiliation towards Russia’s defeat to Japan, because this defeat brought further discredit and embarrassment towards the monarchy and the people sought to overthrow the Tsar in a revolution. The ‘Bloody Sunday’ massacre was to a large extent the cause of the 1905 Russian Revolution as it sparked a nationwide revolution that lasted through the year of 1905, marked by violence from every quarter.
Soldiers in Russia were given orders to open fire on the crowds after uncontrolled waves of protests and strikes by the workers; however, the soldiers—instead of firing into the crowd—joined them. A similar occurrence happened in Hungary when the first revolution was set off because soldiers refused to go to the front lines of the war. Both the Russian and Hungarian revolutions are a tribute to the idea that the masses were in charge of the revolutions. Because peasants felt they were being overlooked with no viable incomes from the land or factories, the lower class was in the midst of an economic crisis while the aristocratic leaders fared far better economically, so support for the war among peasants and the military was easy to garner. As more and more peasants considered a potential revolution, the communist uprisings were gaining momentum and, more importantly, followers.
The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).
The Russians did not hate the Tsar at first as they blamed their troubles on the government, however an event called Bloody Sunday changed their minds. Citizens began to protest outside of Tsar’s palace where many were shot and killed by soldiers. This turned them against the man they once trusted. World War I also occurred during Tsar’s reign and ultimately killed many unskilled and unequipped Russian soldiers. This caused the citizens to dislike Tsar even
The primary reasoning behind the success of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was the complimentary classifications of its leaders: one was an ideologist, one was an orator, and one was an enforcer. Each played an irreplaceable role in providing their constituents with information and momentum towards change, while still maintaining control of an unstable environment. To a lesser degree, the founders of the Lincoln Electric Company provided a similar hierarchy. They gave their customers tangible reasons to purchase equipment from them while appeasing shareholders with staggering profit margins. Employee incentive programs, systems of performance appraisal, and creative management practices all combined to create a company that bridges different business cultures to benefit their company, community, and investors.
