ipl-logo

October Manifesto Granted Rights To The People Of Russia Essay

1194 Words5 Pages

(a) Examine Source 6. What were two ways the October Manifesto granted rights to the people of Russia?

As a reparation, the Tsarist government promised the people of Russia “the essential foundations of civil freedom”. The October Manifesto also allowing the general population “participation in the duma”, the Tsar decreeing that he would not pass a law without “confirmation by the State duma”.

(b) What two conclusions can be drawn from Source 2 about the Marxist view of Russia in the 19th century? Give evidence from the source to support your conclusions.

Source 2 illustrates the Marxist view of Russia, a six teared pyramid outlining the social hierarchy. It is immediately evident that the proletariat appears downtrodden, the workers and farmers …show more content…

The October Manifesto of 1905 as shown in Source 6 was a significant stride towards unity, the Tsar allowing his people “civil freedom[s]”. In announcing that his health is “inseparable from… the nation[’s]” he is generating genuine connection with his people. This is apparent in Source 4(a), which depicts the strong, protective, and kind Tsar Nicholas, offering his kind hand and raising the sword of “autocracy” against those who threaten them. While peace was promoted in Tsarist Russia, it was consistently short-lived and left the majority craving more.

Russia soon reverted to its original state prevalent in the 19th century as shown in Source 2. The Tsar, once again sitting atop the social order putting daily pressure on the overworked proletariat. After a brief few years of general satisfaction from the people of Russia, the resentment for the Tsar steadily grew again as shown by the statics in Source 5. Between ‘1910’ – ‘1914’ the number of political strikes grew from merely 8 to 2401. As recorded by Historian William C. Andrew in Source 3, the “Czar will never again be safe in the midst of his

Show More
Related

Psycho-Japanese War Dbq

698 Words | 3 Pages

This angered the Russian citizens which led to the Russian Revolution of 1905. On January 22, 1905, approximately 150 workers were killed by soldiers who fired on peaceful protestors, led by priest, Father Gapon, in Saint Petersburg. This event was known as Bloody Sunday and signified the beginning of the Revolution of 1905. Subsequently, several radical groups formed an alliance and organized several mutinies and strikes against the Russian autocracy. Left with no choice, Nicholas II issued a manifesto on October 30, 1905 that granted more suffrage rights, got rid of arbitrary arrest without a trial, and provided for an elected legislature.

Read More

Russian Industrialization Dbq Analysis

1134 Words | 5 Pages

The Russian government treated the working class terribly, leading to several protests and boycotts. S.I. Somov was a Russian Soviet who shared his emotions on his overwhelming experience in the demanding Soviet working class. At a protest, he wrote that there was a “...mystical, religious ecstasy...” that peppered the angry workers who fought for their freedom from the exhausting chains of overwhelming labor and inhumane working conditions (Document 4). He added that the working class was deprived of a lively human soul, and their bitterness and dissatisfaction had “overflowed.” Somov was a worker himself, who first hand experienced the cruelty described and developed his own reasonable emotions towards the topic.

Read More

How Did Stalin Use Terror In The Russian Revolution

522 Words | 3 Pages

The legendary storming of the Winter Palace was more like a routine house arrest since most of the forces defending the palace had already left for home’. For Figes “the Tsarist regime’s downfall was not inevitable, but its own stupidity made it so.” ’ As Figes is a revolutionist historian, for him the Russian Revolution was an infinitely more complicated movement than what Soviet and liberal historians make it out to be. Unlike liberal historians, Orlando Figes tries to use economic, political and social reasons to build a holistic view on Russian society making the historian's view even more valid.

Read More

1917 Revolution Dbq

1224 Words | 5 Pages

During the 20th century, Russia was experiencing turmoil in war and the country was deeply affected with Tsar Nicholas’s wrong decisions and lack of experience in politics. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, Lenin became the ruler of Russia and the USSR and proved to be the best Russian ruler of the 20th century. Before then, Tsarism dominated and Nicholas II was in power until he foresaw many revolutions against his methods of ruling. He remained as the supreme ruler and did not take actions for reforms. However, after the 1917 revolution, which Lenin masterminded, the Tsar was overthrown and the Bolsheviks established a stable government which took control in Russia.

Read More

Symphony For The City Of The Dead Summary

745 Words | 3 Pages

Millions of people in Russia during World War 1 were starving or killed. To make matters even worse, the Russian government was falling apart. Riots started to break out in Russia to end the war. Finally in 1918 the war ended which brought remorse to the people of Russia, however it did not last long. Right after World War 1 the October Revolution took place in Russia to allow the “Bolsheviks-the communists-to power over all other possible parties”(28).

Read More

Oscar Wilde's Examples Of Disobedience Throughout The World

776 Words | 4 Pages

In the early 1900’s the Russian people had become angry at the way the Russian monarchy (Tsar Nicholas II) had handled foreign affairs and how he was treating his people unfairly. They had many protests, one in 1905 and two in 1917. The revolution in 1905 overthrow the absolute monarchy and put in a provisional government. No one really listened to the provisional government, so they overthrew it again in 1917. These revolutions and acts of disobedience led to many unnecessary deaths of innocent people.

Read More

How Did Leo Tolstoy's Impact On Russia

1707 Words | 7 Pages

Article Two in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, adopted by Russia in 1993, states “Man, his rights and freedoms shall be the supreme value” (“Constitution”). In the 1800s, however, this statement would have only applied to noblemen and their superiors. Even those noblemen, however, served the Russian Emperor, an absolute ruler. What changed Russia’s administrative system, giving more power to the people in the 1990s than in previous years? Incredibly, Leo Tolstoy, one of Russia’s most famous writers, greatly impacted how Russians viewed government and life in general.

Read More

Stalin's Russi Similarities Between Totalitarian And Authoritarian Governments

825 Words | 4 Pages

During the twentieth century, Russia went through many significant changes to the structure of the country. The main reason for these changes were the influence of Stalin and Lenin and their fierce need to trick the public and inevitably inflict further consequences onto the country. Russia was brought into a new state of authoritarian and totalitarian government regimes. These regimes included many differences to characteristics of life in the country including government force, conditions of life and living standards, and impact to the country and surrounding alliances. The similarities between authoritarian and totalitarian governments are vast and nearly identical, yet differences are also experienced and can easily be seen through Lenin

Read More

Russian Empire Of The Romanovs

265 Words | 2 Pages

1917 was an extremely volatile year for Russia, during which two complete revolutions of government took place within the space of eight months, and a formerly staunch and inflexible hereditary empire of over two hundred years was completely dismantled. The Russian Empire of the Romanovs was one of the largest in the history of the world, and experienced the implementation of one of the most sophisticated systems of government and civil service, one of the fastest and most far-reaching expansions of national infrastructure, and one of the most feared military forces of the time. Yet by the time of the outbreak of the Russian revolution in February of 1917, the idea of uprising had seemed rather obvious to those both inside and outside of Russia’s

Read More

Why Was Nicholas II A Weak Leader In Russia

1154 Words | 5 Pages

The weak leadership of Tsar Nicholas II was the defining factor of the outbreak of the February/March 1917 Russian Revolution. What follows is an explanation of the complex set of circumstances, which were exacerbated by the weak leadership of Nicholas II, ultimately leading to his abdication in February 1917. “Nicholas II was an absolute monarch who could appoint and dismiss ministers at will, determine policy, and in wartime, command the Armed Forces” (MacMillan, 2014, p.196). As a child, Nicholas II was taught by an arch-conservative, Pobedonostsev, who loathed any kind of liberalism and democracy (Lynch and Woodland, 2008 p.12). The ideologies preached by Pobedonostsev, were concepts that Nicholas II would take to heart, as can be clearly seen in his subsequent policies.

Read More

Aristotle's Justification Of The October Revolution Of Russia In 1917

905 Words | 4 Pages

State-censored History textbooks were my first source; they depict a blur image: social conflicts in the Russian Empire were acute and the World War worsened the situation—both the bourgeoisie and the proletariats wished to overthrow the Tsar. As a result, in March, 1917, after the bourgeois revolution, the Provisional Government was established. Because the Provisional Government continued the World War, the subsequent October Revolution, in which Lenin led the proletariats to fight for social justice and equality, established the first socialist country (Volume 1, Lesson 19, People's Education Press,

Read More

Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).

Read More

Russian Revolution Social Impact Essay

870 Words | 4 Pages

In discussing the statement, ‘Lenin had the biggest impact on Russia between the years 1861-1941’, it is important to consider the other people who had a significant impact on Russian history during that time. This is likely to include such influential leaders such as Nicholas II, Alexander II, Joseph Stalin, Leon Trotsky and even Karl Marx. In reality, the two individual who had the greatest influence on Russia during the period 1861 - 1941 were Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin. I have therefore chosen to focus on these two individuals and compare and contrast their impact on Russian

Read More

Nicholas II Miscalculation Analysis

753 Words | 4 Pages

In the beginning of 20th century, dismissal of Witte, overestimation of power of Russian troops, underestimation of capabilities of Japanese troops and later war against Japan, which triggered social classes to start revolution inside the country, was a turning point for revolutionary movements to win. After the revolution in 1905, Nicholas II had the possibility to make the situation better for dynasty, while after the election of the Duma in 1907, Bolshevik party was in crisis and Lenin opposed Aleksandr Bogdanov, but the Tsar could not use that moment for the good of the dynasty. One of the examples of Nicholas II miscalculation was aggressive politics toward non Russian society (which was approximately 57% of the

Read More

Essay On The Causes Of Russian Revolution

1308 Words | 6 Pages

“Is what you want? A miserable little bourgeois republic? In the name of the great Soviet republic of labour we declare war to the death on such a government!” (Bukharin, 1917) . The Russians were fed up of being poorly treated by their own country, so they decided to take a stance.

Read More

More about October Manifesto Granted Rights To The People Of Russia Essay

Related Topics

Open Document