ipl-logo

Stalin's Russi Similarities Between Totalitarian And Authoritarian Governments

825 Words4 Pages

During the twentieth century, Russia went through many significant changes to the structure of the country.The main reason for these changes were the influence of Stalin and Lenin and their fierce need to trick the public and inevitably inflict further consequences onto the country. Russia was brought into a new state of authoritarian and totalitarian government regimes. These regimes included many differences to characteristics of life in the country including government force, conditions of life and living standards, and impact to the country and surrounding alliances. The similarities between authoritarian and totalitarian governments are vast and nearly identical, yet differences are also experienced and can easily be seen through Lenin …show more content…

The well being and overall quality of life for citizens was sacrificed when government structure had changed. The common characteristics between authoritarian and totalitarian in this topic include severe poverty in communities due to government control and unfair rationing of resources. Also lack of proper education since the government puts focus on other things such as military strength. Lastly, extreme labour with inadequate pay is also often put in place with totalitarian and authoritarian governments because the government needs more resources than it can safely acquire in a short period of time. All of these traits can be seen strongly in both Lenin and Stalin's Russia. Stalin’s Russia was more forceful in pursuing these traits as can be seen with the purges taking place for anyone not properly following this rule of Russian society. In Lenin’s Russia, though dialed down, is still very prominent with citizens lives being neglected in order to better the state of the country. In both totalitarian and authoritarian governments, these factors are identical. Both forms of government put importance in the wellbeing of the country rather than the people in it and are prominently seen in both Lenin and Stalin's

Show More
Related
619 Words | 3 Pages

Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

Stalin and Hitler: Similarities and Differences Stalin and Hitler emerged at the time when political and economic instability had crippled the USSR and Germany. They began making improvements which encouraged their people to believe that prosperous times await them. This notion would unfortunately turn out as an illusion. Both figures would eventually rule by decree. Despite treading on different paths of ruling, both figures still find some commonalities.

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

here are many dangerous leaders, but I will be comparing and contrasting between Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Both of these leaders took their control in Russia. I will be telling you about both HItler’s and Stalin’s political ideology, treatment of citizens, and goals of these leaders. The ideology of Adolf Hitler is the Nazi ideology, this is an ideology that received its political form in the regime that governed Germany from 1933-1945. On the other hand, Stalin imposed government control over the Soviet Union’s economy.

Read More
1911 Words | 8 Pages

During Stalins reign (1879-1953) the citizens of Russia were subjected to insane poverty, hunger and distress. They had a constant threat of getting thrown into the Gulag if they spoke against Stalins way. During our discussion a very good point was raised about how Russia itself was almost like a Gulag. The citizens were not allowed to speak their own opinion in fear of being subjected to punishment.

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro were dictators famous for their communist ideology and violent reigns while totalitarian dictators. Defined by Dictionary.com, Totalitarianism is “absolute control by the state or a governing branch of a highly centralized institution” and a dictator is “a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.” Dictators are usually stern, but passionate in front of the public. Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro both came to rise in environments that were challenging politically, economically, socially or all of the above. They offered another light that people were desperate to see.

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

During Stalins reign (1879-1953) the citizens of Russia were subjected to insane poverty, hunger and distress. They had a constant threat of getting thrown into the Gulag if they spoke against Stalins way. During our discussion a very good point was raised about how Russia itself was almost like a Gulag. The citizens were not allowed to speak their own opinion in fear of being

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

How did this form of government start and why did it just keep rising after all the bad things they’ve done? The way Stalin succeeded with his power was by “Purging all of his rivals and emerged as the undisputed leader of the party and country” (Britannica Totalitarianism). So what this is telling us is that Stalin just came up from nowhere only because he fought his way up there not because they voted him in or wanted him. He made himself that position and didn’t back down from it. They were controlling people even before day one.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

While both had a passion to make communism work, Stalin went down the wrong path in order to make it work. In the readings of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin, I was able to learn a great deal of knowledge about each of their

Read More
1240 Words | 5 Pages

2. What are the ideological differences of each type of government? The Soviet Union’s fundamental ideas that it was founded upon is to create a country powerful and strong in the military and also in the category of economy. In order for the Soviet Union to flourish in the industry, Stalin established a law that would limit the worker’s freedom and control their every aspect of the worker’s lives. In other words Stalin and his government took control of the economy.

Read More
79 Words | 1 Pages

Stalinism is the belief of partaking the ways of governing created by Stalin. Stalin’s way of ruling was rather more controlling from which the central government but make the whole central government communists rather than capitalists, because he was afraid of capitalism taking over. He used his power illegally by purging many people who did not have the same beliefs as Stalin believed in, which is communism. He believed that these people were threats to communist rule in

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The proletariat, no class, no movements, no economic ideology, no money, what you need is what you get nothing less and nothing more, this is Communism. Authoritarian, state has always been first, strong nationalism, all the power rests on one leader, this is Fascism. Joseph Stalin, a Georgian bank robber and successor to Vladimir Lenin, lead Communist Russia from the 1920’s up to 1953. Adolf Hitler, a native Austrian, failed artist, and former German soldier, who lead Nazi Germany from 1934 to 1945 tearing apart Europe leaving chaos and destruction everywhere. Communism and Fascism while being on opposite ends of the political spectrum and completely different on paper, but in reality they are very similar.

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

Totalitarianism is a centralized government that does not tolerate parties of differing opinion and that exercises dictatorial control over many aspects of life and is commonly used by dictators. Dictators began using it in the early 1920’s and had an effect on the world soon after. In order for these dictators to obtain power, they need to do things to motivate people that the dictator”s beliefs are right, and that they have a solution to everyone's troubles. Some of the things they need to become a dictator is Propaganda, Terror, Charisma, Economic control, and Extreme nationalism, which was what Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

• Introduction In the early 20th century the two countries with the biggest population in Europe were under control of dictatorships. One was Nazi Germany which was under the ruler Adolf Hitler since 1933 and the other country was the Soviet Union was under the control of Joseph Stalin since the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924. The two countries are both ruled by ideas from two sides of the political spectrum. First Nazism is found on the far-right of the political spectrum.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

In discussing the statement, ‘Lenin had the biggest impact on Russia between the years 1861-1941’, it is important to consider the other people who had a significant impact on Russian history during that time. This is likely to include such influential leaders such as Nicholas II, Alexander II, Joseph Stalin, Leon Trotsky and even Karl Marx. In reality, the two individual who had the greatest influence on Russia during the period 1861 - 1941 were Joseph Stalin and Vladimir Lenin. I have therefore chosen to focus on these two individuals and compare and contrast their impact on Russian

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

Let me seize this moment to discussion the literature on authoritarianism, fascism, and dictatorship through the theoretical approach of behaviorism. First of all, let me inform you that the authoritarianism, Fascism, and dictatorship are all form of governments that lack the tendency to have electoral competition and widespread of voting participation. Though they are widely considered nondemocratic interim of their values and tempt to share a negative characteristic, but they little in common. Authoritarianism: has been widely considered by many scholars as a nondemocratic traditional form of government because they seem to have a single party system, usually lead by one man and a powerful secret police or small group of people, no party or weak party system, no mass mobilization but mentality.

Read More

More about Stalin's Russi Similarities Between Totalitarian And Authoritarian Governments

Related Topics

Open Document