Nicholas II Response To The Russian Revolution Of 1905

913 Words4 Pages

In Russia, there were many riots and rebellions that took place for the advantage of the people, to benefit and make the lifestyle in Russia more suitable. Some of the prominent riots in rebellion occurred in the early the 1900s. For example, the Russian Revolution of 1905. It was a revolution to transform the Russian government from an autocracy to a constitutional monarchy. Another riot that occurred during the early 1900s was on January 22, 1905, known as Bloody Sunday. In this riot, the imperial military had killed the people that were involved in the riot. With the riots and rebellions that occurred, it led to the tsar to implement regulations to please the people. Along with the tsar implementing the regulations, the occurrence of written …show more content…

As the strikes increased, tsar Nicholas II had responded to the plead of the working class with the October Manifesto. In the book, “Major Problems in the History of Imperial Russia”, by James Cracraft, contains a document titled, “The October Manifesto of Nicholas II, 1905”. This document was Nicholas II response to the Russian Revolution of 1905, as it addressed the basic civil rights to the people and the creation of an elected parliament which was known as the State Duma. In the beginning of the document, Nicholas states that the riots are causing the nation despair and to obliged with theses riots and disturbances, he will unite the government. “We believe it necessary to unify the operations of the higher government. We therefore enjoin the government to execute this, Our inflexible will” (Cracraft 596). The manifesto mentions three listing that will be executed. The first is to grant the people civic freedom, freedom of conscience, speech, assembly, and association. The second statement is the formation of the State Duma, which were an elective assembly of the lower house. The last statement allows no laws to pass without the approval of the State Duma. With these proclamations instated, it attempts to satisfy the peasantry with their own civil rights and it formed an assembly of …show more content…

Petersburg Workmen’s Petition to the Tsar, January 9, 1905”, he had also composed another petition to the tsar titled, “Father Gapon’s Petition to Nicholas II, January 22, 1905”. As both petition was written by Gapon, it displays the active involvement of Gapon to the government. In Gapon’s petition to the tsar on January 22, 1905, it addresses the same wants as those in his other petitions. Which were civil rights, freedom of speech, press, and equality. In the document labeled, “Slap in the Face of Public Taste”, by D. Burliuk, Alexander Kruchenykh, V. Myakovsky, and Victor Khlebnikov, explains the objective of progressing forward from previous beliefs that had failed Russia. This document conveys the change of the previous views of Russian history to those of futurism. In the beginning of the document, it presents ideas of futurism. The most prominent lines of futurism are, “He who does not forget his first love will not recognize his last.” Futurism was a Russian movement of poets and artists who rejected the ideals of the past to focused on the present and future. The line above is interpreted, in the perspective of poets, to mean the focused of Russian history frequently, will lead to losing sights of the moments of what is to come. As the document is influencing the views of futurism, its intentions are for the public, the people of