How Did Hitler Use Collective Security

924 Words4 Pages
What path should the allied powers have gone down in order to create a world peace? Would the world consist of less poverty? How would world history and economy be different from how it is today? Nations opposing Adolf Hitler should have used collective security to potentially stop a world war. Three reasons why opposing nations should have used collective security is because if Hitler were appeased, then he would continue to imperialise other nations. Secondly, collective security would have been used to stop the growth of power of Adolf Hitler, especially the size of his empire. Lastly, a civil revolution could be created inside of Hitler 's central source of power, Germany, only if force was taken. If nations continued to appease Adolf Hitler while he grew to power, he would continue to imperialise more and more nations. There wouldn’t be anything or anybody to stop him, so why should he stop taking over more land to grow his power. If Adolf Hitler isn’t threatened, there wouldn’t be a reason to stop invading other territories. If he isn 't placed under pressure then he will be given time to think out his plans to successfully imperialise greater nations than him gaining superior power. Adolf Hitler is smart enough to predict and understand the vulnerability of the remaining European nations. He knows how to place himself in the leaders shoes and can decide how they feel about standing up to Hitler. Hitler knows that due to the after effects of WWI, no nation is in