How Did The Grand Vizier Change The Ottoman Empire

In the late 16th century, the Ottoman Empire underwent several profound changes due to the reign of Murad III and his successor, Mehmed III. According to the article "Sultan, Imperial Council, Grand Vizier: Changes in the Ottoman Ruling Elite and the Formation of the Grand Vizieral Telḫiṣ" by Pal Fodor, these changes included the centralization of power in the imperial palace, a shift in the Ottoman household system from a decentralized system to a centralized one, and the creation of the office of the Grand Vizier. This new office granted the Grand Vizier authority second only to the Sultan, making him one of the most powerful figures in the Ottoman Empire. Additionally, the Grand Vizier was also given considerable revenue, further increasing

The devşirme had grown in power and influence within the empire, and Murad and Mehmed sought to use them to strengthen the Ottoman Empire and diminish the power of the Turkish notables. This entailed the creation of the office of the Grand Vizier, who was given authority second only to the Sultan. The Grand Vizier was also given considerable revenue, further increasing his authority. The centralization of power also led to a shift in the Ottoman household system. This shift was from a decentralized system to a centralized one. The decentralized system had previously given Turkish notables considerable power within the empire, but under the new centralized system, power was increasingly concentrated in the imperial palace. This shift in the Ottoman household system was further reinforced by the creation of the office of the Grand Vizier. The Grand Vizier was given authority second only to the Sultan, making him one of the most powerful figures in the Ottoman Empire. Additionally, the Grand Vizier was also given considerable revenue, further increasing his

The rebellions were caused by a number of factors, including economic and social crises, worsening climate conditions, and the oppressive policies of the Ottoman government. William Griswold's essay "Djalali" notes that the rebellions were led by Celali leaders, who were mostly former Ottoman soldiers and adventurers who had been displaced by the changes in the military organization. The rebellions led to the flight of peasants from the land and the subsequent loss of tax revenue, and the Ottoman government was forced to reestablish relative calm in rural Anatolia by granting concessions to the Celali leaders. In Mücteba İlgürel's essay "Celali İsyanları," it is argued that the rebellions were largely caused by climate-related issues, such as drought and famine, as well as the oppressive policies of the Ottoman government. The rebellions had major political consequences, with the Ottoman government being forced to grant concessions to the Celali leaders in order to reestablish