The Atomic bomb is a release of nuclear energy, due to the sudden release in energy it causes a violent explosive power, creating a tremendous amount of damage. In Hiroshima, the Atomic bomb killed 14,800 more people per square mile than the traditional fire bomb (National Archives United States). The war in the Pacific, against Japan was the first war in history to practice nucleic weapons. It is believed that when Truman was faced with the choice on whether or not to drop the bombs, despite his morals, he decided that dropping the bomb was essential to scaring and dismissing Russia. Which brings us to 1945 on August 6th when the first Atomic bomb was dropped, even though Truman did not have the right to drop the Atomic bombs on Japan. Firebombing was working to defeat Japan, Truman’s first priority should have been defeating Japan, not being focussed on Russia, and the people of Japan had nothing to do with it so we shouldn’t be killing them. Because of the Atomics bombs being such a devastating and heavyhearted time, 72 years …show more content…
They’re mindset is if you stand on the battlefield you are to devote your body and soul till honorable death or victory (Japanese View History Second War). They would argue that the Atomic bomb is the only way that we could’ve gotten Japan to surrender. But that point is invalid and incorrect because it states, “Japanese soldiers”, the US bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were critical parts of Japan that had innocent civilians living in them, not Japanese soldiers who would do anything to have victory or honorable death. It was unreasonable to bomb the innocent children and wives who had nothing to do with any of it. To conclude, Truman did not have the right to drop the Atomic bombs on Japan because by dropping them he killed innocent children and families who had nothing to do with the