ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

556 Words3 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been controversal for decades. Truman’s decision is correct because Hiroshima still is a symbol of triumph ending a horrendous global conflict. Truman and his advisors were confused about whether they should bomb Hiroshima or not. Also Henry Stimson wanted to warn Japan about the bomb so they could surrenodor.But Truman also affected hundred thousand lives. People that survived had to go through pain and suffering. In “https://www.trumanlibrary.gov” it states “The Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, brought the United States officially into World War II. In the surprise attack, Japan sunk several ships, destroyed hundreds of planes and ended thousands of lives. The Japanese goal was to cripple the U.S. Pacific fleet, and they nearly succeeded.`” This shows how the world war conflict started to happen. …show more content…

It is hard to imagine that the Japanese would have surrendered the atomic bomb. Japanese battle plans that were in place when the bombs were dropped called for a massive, sudicidal defense of the home islands, in which the imperial government would moblize not only several million fighting men but also millions of ordinary citizens who had been trained and indoctrinated to resist to theend with primitive makeshift weapons. This shows that if Truman didn’t do the first bomb Japan probably wouldnt have

Open Document