ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

556 Words3 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been controversal for decades. Truman’s decision is correct because Hiroshima still is a symbol of triumph ending a horrendous global conflict. Truman and his advisors were confused about whether they should bomb Hiroshima or not. Also Henry Stimson wanted to warn Japan about the bomb so they could surrenodor.But Truman also affected hundred thousand lives. People that survived had to go through pain and suffering. In “https://www.trumanlibrary.gov” it states “The Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, brought the United States officially into World War II. In the surprise attack, Japan sunk several ships, destroyed hundreds of planes and ended thousands of lives. The Japanese goal was to cripple the U.S. Pacific fleet, and they nearly succeeded.`” This shows how the world war conflict started to happen. …show more content…

It is hard to imagine that the Japanese would have surrendered the atomic bomb. Japanese battle plans that were in place when the bombs were dropped called for a massive, sudicidal defense of the home islands, in which the imperial government would moblize not only several million fighting men but also millions of ordinary citizens who had been trained and indoctrinated to resist to theend with primitive makeshift weapons. This shows that if Truman didn’t do the first bomb Japan probably wouldnt have

Show More
Related

How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq

719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More

Hiroshima Vs Nagasaki Dbq

184 Words | 1 Pages

In the United States, it is often taught that the use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the deciding factor for the Japanese to surrender during World War II. However, upon closer inspection that may not be the reason why. For example, by the time both cities were destroyed Japan had already lost dozens of cities to American fire bombs and conventional raids. As a result, the only difference between the cities that were previously burned and Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the type of weapon used. Therefore,the Japanese government was aware and accustomed to loosing cities and large number of civilian lives.

Read More

To What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

608 Words | 3 Pages

WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

699 Words | 3 Pages

Chloe Couch Mrs. Albright Writing 8C January 31, 2022 Bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Imagine you have been fighting in a war that seems neverending. Would you decide to drop a bomb that would kill thousands of people? This is the decision President Truman had to make.

Read More

Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay

498 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.

Read More

Truman Should Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

332 Words | 2 Pages

In August of 1945 Truman had to make a huge decision, this was whether to drop the atomic bomb or not to. Truman ultimately decided in the end to drop the bomb on Nagasaki on August 6th, 1945. Truman should have dropped the Atom bomb because it ended a bloody war and began an era of peace for the world, and because a land invasion of Japan would have resulted in countless American deaths. Dropping the bomb ended an insanely bloody war. More than 70 million people were killed during World War 2, and invading Japan would have caused even more people to die (Fallen).

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

567 Words | 3 Pages

Truman was the president of the United States at the time, so its obvious why he choose to drop the bomb. It would save more American lives this way. “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon and did not use it and let a million more people die” (Doc L). If he didn’t drop it, about 400,000 to 800,000 American lives would have been lost (OI). If Japan couldn’t make war, there wouldn’t be war.

Read More

Dbq Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

517 Words | 3 Pages

The deployment of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by President Truman during WWII is a contentious issue still debated today. With an aim to achieve victory over Japan without any further loss of life or military resources, some say that his decision was logical and ultimately successful in accomplishing national goals. However, others regard this act as immoral claiming that such violence could never be justifiable under any circumstance. In support of dropping the atomic bomb, proponents asserted that it was crucial to quickly end the war and avoid further loss of American lives. According to Document 3, Secretary Stimson believed that deploying the bomb was crucial to quickly end the conflict and avoid a land invasion of Japan, which would have caused more American lives to be lost.

Read More

One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest Humor Analysis

625 Words | 3 Pages

The use of humor to alleviate the dull reality of life is used in Ken Kesey’s novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, which supports the idea that one's own humor creates happiness in others and relieves stress much like in the critically acclaimed Christmas classic, Elf, starring Will Ferrell. Humor is used by Ken Kesey very prominently especially when the patients do not seem to have the ability to laugh at anything nor find anything funny. The patients live a very dull life in which they repeat their monotonous cycle of life in the ward. They no longer have known what it is like in the norm because of the Big Nurse wears them down with the oppressive nature of the Combine.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

657 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6 1945 the first atomic bomb, Little Boy, was dropped on Hiroshima. Now many people including historians look back at that moment and say it was not necessary. In recent weeks, tensions between The United States and Japan rose due to President Obama’s trip to Japan where he did not apologize for the United States bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Contrary to popular belief, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary because it saved the lives of millions of people, destroyed important military factories and ports and made the Japanese surrender and end the war.

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The US used the A-bomb to save its soldier, which could have been lost. Japan planning to surrender to the Russian but only if there can keep their emperor making The atomic bomb pointless. With many military leaders on point, agreeing that dropping the atomic bomb was unnecessary. Only president Truman could have made the choice to try to save American lives but in saving them, he will be kill millions of innocent people. Imagined being in President Truman shoes try to make the choice of whether or not to press the big red

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

278 Words | 2 Pages

For my final paper, I would like to discuss both the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the bombing of Pearl Harbor from the perspectives of the United States and the Japanese to see if one was more successful than the other. I will go about this by examining both primary and secondary sources that discuss various aspects of each event. These aspects would include the goal of the attacker (United States for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan for Pearl Harbor), how well each bombing was actually executed by the attacker, and then what effects the bombing had on the receiving country, which could include immediate effects such as deaths and destruction, as well as long-term effects such as radiation. This last part would also include if the

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

Read More

The Bombings On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

252 Words | 2 Pages

The Bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki took place on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The bombings were approved by The Interim Committee, The Target Committee, President Truman, and Stalin. The preparations for the bombings start on July 16th,1945 with the successful testing of the “Gadget” (Foundation)during the Trinity test. Throughout the months leading up to the bombings the development of the bombs was taking place. After Months of deciding the targets and creating the bombs, it was finally time to drop them.

Read More

Essay On The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

934 Words | 4 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs on World War II on the city of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very important part of World War II. The atomic bomb ended the war between America and Japan. This was just one of the important events during the battle in World War II. The Battle at Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese attacked U.S. soil was also why the americans bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some believe that the United States was correct in dropping these bombs on Japan because of the attack on Pearl Harbor while others believe that it was very wrong to dropped the bomb.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

Related Topics

Open Document