On April 11th 1962, President John F. Kennedy gave a speech over the “hike” in steel prices, Kennedy uses an abundance of rhetorical devices to show to leaders in a news conference as well as America, that there is no justification for an increase in steel prices. Kennedy uses logos in this speech as well as emotional appeal to tell that every citizen can't sacrifice more than they already have for this country. In the first part of his speech, anaphora is found with the constant repetition of “it would’ as he's telling of all the negative things raising steel prices would do. By showing these things he's trying to prove there's no need for an increase in steel prices. In his speech, Kennedy talks of the four people that were killed …show more content…
Why would they raise oil prices when there's stronger issues to worry about? The organization of the essay as a whole shifts in tone as well as pace. It will go from making the reader feel emotionally connected to families who are being asked to leave their homes for months at a time to using logos to talk about national security. Half of the speech is about how it would effect the average american as well as their families to how it would affect the nation as a whole. This is important because the reader first can relate to the speech then they are forced to think outside the box on the reasons that the increase of steel prices is a bad thing. The point of view is from the President and this helps show there's no justification in raising steel prices because it's from the President's point of view. Kennedy is a credible source because at this time he was the president and the people elected him. He knows best and throughout the speech he shifts his point of view to look at different situations such as what different departments and unions are doing to look at what would happen if it was raised, to steel today(when the speech was given) he shifts throughout different time frames to prove