The act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences is known as “Civil Disobedience”. Individuals practicing acts of civil disobedience retain a compelling impact on society; often determining the outcomes of large-scale issues. It is affirmed through the evaluation of both historical and current instances that defiance against unjust laws positively impacts free society through the protection of civil liberties. Through the teachings of Henry David Thoreau, it is understood that a person’s individuality, and nature to express themselves, is a crucial aspect of preserving civil liberties. Within his texts, Thoreau would commonly represent the mind as a beautiful and complicated object that has great potential when given proper foundation and support. To protect the freedoms of expressing individualism, Thoreau actively supported civil disobedience. In his essay, "Resistance to Civil Government", Thoreau expresses his strong belief that the “mind is the only reality, of which all other natures are better or worse reflectors” (Schneider). Henry David Thoreau understands that the only true reality is what is anticipated by one’s own individual perspective and that no other force may demonstrate one’s ideas without outward forcefulness. …show more content…
Gandhi practiced means of non-violent protest in order to obtain the goals he shared with his followers and partners. Mahatma Gandhi actively led in boycotts, fasts, and marches that disobeyed the current governments ("Mahatma Gandhi" 4). It was Gandhi’s ambition to obtain societal liberties through the resistance of laws viewed to be unjust. Through his actions of non-violent protest, Gandhi was able to provide a positive impact by ensuring the success of India’s independence from English