In the article, “Savage Inequalities: Children in U.S. Schools”, by Jonathan Kozol, discusses the inequalities that exist in class differences. Money is spent more in wealthy areas than in the poor or low class areas. The schools located in the wealthy areas are funded more and receive more supplies and better teachers. The schools in the not-so-wealthy areas do not have the best teachers and they need better teachers than the students in the wealthy areas. Kozol displays how schools are still segregated as they were in the past.
“ Under the Obama administration, the federal government functioned as a giant octopus, bypassing families, communities, and states in order to reach its tentacles into the school curriculum, teacher evaluation, values conformity and even restroom policies.” ( Ashford 2017) Her idea is to let kids of different religions build their own schools or choose which schools they go too. The funding will be more evenly distributed giving disadvantaged kids the chance to learn. These disadvantaged kids will have the choice of what school they can attend too.
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez case. Texas public primary and secondary schools rely on local property taxes for supplemental income. These schools are designed to establish a minimum education threshold at each school. The San Antonio District in the representation of families residing in poor districts challenged this funding scheme by arguing that students were disadvantaged because their schools lacked the property used by other districts, and academic programs receiving government funding should favor all students equally. Having already talked the facts of the San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, I would like to discuss how this has been another topic of much attention within the Department of Education of different districts.
These results should not be surprising. When the goal is to reduce property taxes, there is a good chance politicians will decrease taxes and school funding overall as adding offsetting taxes would seem at cross-purposes with the reduction in property taxes. However, when the goal is to increase equality and help all students succeed, politicians will seek out additional funds to support schools currently near the bottom. At the least, they won’t reduce overall funding in support of equality. Moreover, almost 25 years after reform, Michigan schools are still funded unequally (and won’t be equal for another 20 years at the current rate).
In some schools spending per student exceeds $10000 per year but the graduation rate is below 50 percent for example in Detroit. Detroit spends about 11100 per year on each student but only 25 percent of their student’s graduate high school. Policymakers should focus on reforming policies and resource allocations to improve student achievement. According to the National Center for Education Statistics 52 percent of public Education expenditures are spent on instruct and this percentage keeps decreasing overtime. Children who benefit from the school choice program usually have higher test scores than their peers.
How could impoverished city residents not having proper access to resources in their communities and school systems impact children and even teachers in school? In the novel, There Are No Children Here, the author, Alex Kotlowitz, retells stories of the residents of Henry Horner public housing who are shown to have inadequate support from the Chicago Public School System and community around them. Considering that these students and teachers did not have enough support from the school and community, it’s evident that the Chicago Public School System could not effectively meet their needs. It’s clear that the Chicago Public Schools system is severely underfunded. A great example of this is a situation in which Pharoah and Lafayette’s elementary
In addition, the Government Accountability Office [GAO] (2016) reported: “from school years 2000-2001 to 2013-2014, the percentage of all K-12 public schools that had high percentages of poor and black or Hispanic students grew from 9 to 16 percent” (p. 2). These findings suggest that practices of racially and economically segregating students of color continue unresolved. Sadly, poverty and race are automatic disqualifiers for children of color to have equal access to quality
HFD 110 November 18th, 2015 60 schools, 30 districts, and 11 states that’s how many Jonathan Kozol visited after several years of watching and experiencing inner city children school districts. Back in the 1960s Jonathan Kozol was working with segregation schools in New York where Kozel was able to observe the students and the programs and was able to soon enough find out the problems that these schools were having. Kozel gives a lot of statistic through out to help the readers see how bad inner city schools have been over the years and still to this day the issues that they are having. One being while walking through the halls of one inner city school out of 2,000 children he did not see one white child. Usually these schools are made up of Blacks, Hispanics and even sometimes Asians barely ever you will see a white child.
This makes the children in the lower class society feel less important than they already are. In contrary making the higher-class feel as they have empowerment. Lower-class societies suffer to receive the education needed to further their intellect. In the reading “The Sanctuary of School” by Lynda Barry we are introduced to the lack of sufficient funds to support public schools in the lower class neighborhoods. “People of this country are still told that cutting budgets for public schools is necessary” (Barry 859).
Rich people can afford to send their children to the best schools at an early age because they pay thousands of dollars for this opportunity. Poor schools often have high percentages of children who are minorities. Which means that those students fall behind early in life. Segment four talked about the uneven distribution of money going to the students.
Although schools of over a thousand students have flourished in America, when it comes to poorer neighborhoods, scores are profoundly low. I believe that despite the fact that my parents do not have enough money to send me to an opulent school with favorable circumstances, I should still have equal education opportunities. As history shows, It seems that the public school system is having the same problems that manifested themselves decades ago. We are slowly, but surely, returning to segregated schools where the better schools and the better educational opportunities are in suburbia, and the better schools are being attended by mainly white students, while urban schools are being attended by minority students.
For many African American families education is the ladder for upward mobility. It is seen as the equalizer, the pathway to opportunity. Research have shown that one key contributor to this problem is funding. During the 70’s there was a budget crisis which limits funding’s in New York’s public schools.
Over half the public schools in the south are poor and are overwhelmed by the consequences of poverty. While the program itself can deem quite expensive, the long-term effects make it worth the investment. Education in Mississippi is suffering due to the lack of government support and community
Now some Americans believe that they will pay more in taxes than they will for actually paying the tuition of that school. This could be the case for higher-income families due to the fact that the more money one makes the more taxes the IRS retrieves from one 's paycheck. However, It is the responsibility of those families to help their fellow Americans. Every families economic background is the product of laws and decisions made by the government and the American public. To this day the ghetto 's of America are the parts of this country that have been rejected and looked down upon by the government and its fellow citizens because of criminal activity and low-income status.
School funding is also based on the school population size. Why should newer schools with high income students get to have a lot more resources then the other schools with low income students. Why is it that lower income schools aren’t given the same resources to help the students? These students with low income do have the same opportunity as the higher income new schools. A lot of those students don’t have access to internet or even have a ride for transportation.
