ipl-logo

How The Executive Branch Abuse The Power Of Government

1388 Words6 Pages

As a role model of a fair and free country of the world that has long being recognized for its democracy. The US’ power of government was distributed equally into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. The executive branch is represented by a president, and the legislative branch is represented by a congress. According to the US Constitution, both the president and Congress have equal power and a part in foreign policy. The constitutional law allows the president the treaty power, executive agreement, and appointment power to be the dominant force in foreign policymaking. Congress is given the power of declaring war and budget-making to proclaim its role in foreign policy. While it is important to have the president as a leader, …show more content…

Under Article I section 8 of the Constitution of the United Stated of America, Congress has the power to declare war, provide and maintain the Navy, as well raise support for armies. In Article II section 2 the power of the president is the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, the president assigns the ambassadors, upon consent from the Senate, also under Article 2 section 3, the president must meet with other foreign ambassadors and other public ministers. This parting caused a difference in viewpoints, with regards to Congress being a part of foreign policy. Under the authorities of the President and Congress, the relations of the executive branch and legislative branch are complicated. The executive branch abused its power in 1970, with Watergate and Vietnam giving way to discontent among the American people. Congress began to stress its dominance in foreign policy making, due to the legislative laws. They started to limit the President's power over military objectives. For example, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution over Nixon’s veto. This limited the President's power to send troops to Vietnam. Through this law, the president can only use troops abroad in three different circumstances. First, troops can be used when Congress declares war and approves the president authority to send military units to combat. Secondly, troops can also be used when the …show more content…

The roles of each branch of government is balanced and acted by the constitution. The constitution grants that no branch of power will have more power than the other. The president can create bills and policies but the legislative branch is the one that decides if they whether it pass or not. In other words, the legislative branch checks the president’s decision and determines if the decision is the right one. If the legislative branch does not check the executive branch decision, then there can be possible problems that can arise such as education, tax reforms, politics, and of course military. These are some instances that the executive branch may choose a bill or decide to reform a policy on certain criteria but Congress chose to pass or not. Furthermore, it is crucial that Congress limits the executive power when it comes to financial and foreign policies. As previously mentioned, Congress has power of the purse, so they get to decide where money will be spent. One can see that when the executive and legislative branch work together, forms of policies and the nation debt can have a positive or negative result. It’s critical that Congress plays a role in checking the executive branch, for if one branch holds more power, disaster can

Show More
Related
1310 Words | 6 Pages

They also advise the president on proposals from departments and agencies and help review their proposed regulations. 33. The War Powers Resolution was the law passed that limited the president’s role as Commander in Chief. This law requires the president to consult with Congress prior to using military force and to withdraw forces after 60 days unless Congress declares war or grants an extension. This gives more power to the legislative branch, which is Congress, because Congress could pass a resolution at any time that could not be vetoed, that would end American participation in war zones.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

As James Madison put it in Federalist No.51, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” The branches were intended to check each other lest they become too powerful. If the president claimed supreme war power as commander in chief, he could essentially go to war without a war declaration, as has historically been the case. James K. Polk, for example, acted out of the ambition to acquire new territory and used his commander in chief entitlement to instigate the Mexican American war by stationing troops on the border. The War Powers Resolution hinders “imperial presidents taking America to war… without public approval or the constitutionally required legislative sanction.”

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

War Power Reform When it comes to war-making powers, both the legislative and the executive branches play a major role determining the course of action. Constitutionally the legislative branch has the power to declare war, but the president (executive branch), without Congress’s permission, can “make” war. This is due to the War Powers Resolution, which was enacted by Congress in 1973 to keep the president in check.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Government, Checks and Balances refers to the Separation of Power in the Government, which is ensured through the establishment of three different branches, the Executive branch, the Judicial branch, and the Legislative branch. Each branch has a certain job and the other branches have special powers to watch over it. These are called Checks and Balances, and they make the branches equal so that one doesn't become too powerful. Congress can pass legislation to attempt to limit the Court's power by changing the Court's jurisdiction, by modifying the impact of a Court decision after it has been made, or by amending the Constitution in relation to the Court. The Executive Branch conducts diplomacy with other nations and the President has the power to negotiate and sign treaties, which the Senate ratifies.

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Of the many roles the president plays for the American government, acting as the commander in chief is very important for the common good. The commander-in-chief 's main tasks are to leave the United States military, make decisions in times of war and to control the Armed Forces. However, to prevent excessive military control, checks and balances only allow Congress to declare war, not the

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

With all the powers the Constitution gives the president it also gave Congress the power to reject some of the president's power. These powers that Congress has includes being able to refuse to ratify treaties, discouraging foreign arms sales and prohibiting covert activities. Article II, Section 2,

Read More
1480 Words | 6 Pages

The United States Constitution establishes a government characterized by separate branches that share power, ensuring a system of checks and balances among the executive, legislative, and judicial sectors. These branches each have their own roles and can restrict other branches from overstepping their boundaries. This is seen in the three different powers the government possesses: the President's veto power, Congress's power to enact legislation, and the Supreme Court's power of judicial review to keep each other in check. Though these powers were meant as a way to prevent each branch from gaining too much power, these powers also allow one branch to influence the decisions of other branches. Through presidential vetoes, other branches have to consider the president's opinion on certain laws and orders, through congressional legislation, other branches are influenced through laws that restrict their power, and through judicial review, other branches are influenced as they have to worry about an action being declared as unconstitutional.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution clearly makes the Congress the most powerful of the three branches of government. Depending on the circumstances, however, the President might have more influence on Congress than one would think based on the separation of powers outlined in the

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

The president of the United States and Congress have shared foreign policy powers. This means that for one thing the president can do, Congress can back it or make it fail. For example, the president is the commander-in-chief and can command the troops, yet, Congress is the one who can decide if we are at war. This shared power can be confusing as it can fall into each other’s responsibilities, causing them to overlap. This overlap according to Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, “a zone of twilight in which [the president] and Congress may have concurrent authority, or in which its distribution is uncertain.”

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

He or she is the commander is chief of the armed forces. The President also nominates judges and justices and maintains the cabinet. These powers don’t seem very powerful. But however, the President can be very powerful, especially when the Congress and the President work together, for example when the presidency and the Congress are held by a single political party. In this case, it is very common for the President to set policy that the Congress merely rubber-stamps.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Much of the war powers in the United States government falls on the acts of our Congress. Nonetheless, the President of the United States still holds some powers over the military and over the acts of waging war. Once Congress declares war, it is the duty of the President to be the leader of that war. The Presidents title is the Commander in Chief, therefor all leaders of the military report directly to the President. This title undoubtedly gives the President many powers over war, even ones that are not directly stated in the United States Constitution.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

The constitution attempts to evenly distribute powers between the executive and legislative branches of the federal government by providing the president or the commander-in-chief the power to control and supervise the military upon approval by congress, who have the power to declare war and to support the armed forces. The subject of debate regarding the act is whether the president has the authority to send military troops to war without congressional approval. The way the war powers act was written makes it difficult to decipher approximately how much power is the president privileged in the war-making process. According to the constitution congress have the powers to authorize war by formally granting letters that verify and confirm the

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

For example, Congress, the most powerful of the branches, was given the authority to collect and raise taxes, initiate war, regulate commerce and currency, maintain a military, and make changes via laws when deemed a necessity. Next, the Executive branch, consisting of the President and his cabinet, was given the power to establish treaties, supervise the nation’s military, execute laws, veto acts considered to be unconstitutional, and name potential candidates for diplomatic positions. Lastly, the Judicial branch of government, consisting of the Supreme court and regional courts, was given the power to interpret laws in regards to disputes between states or individuals versus the state, and once ruled upon to be deemed the supreme law of the

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

The legislative, executive, and judicial branches each have ways to check the power of another branch. Congress has the power to approve and confirm Presidential nominations, override a President’s veto, impeach the President and remove him or her from office, and impeach judges from office. The President can nominate judges and veto Congressional legislation. The Court has the rights to declare presidential acts and laws unconstitutional. “...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…

Read More
142 Words | 1 Pages

This grants them more power than in the constitution (Cost,2012). Congress heavily depends on executive actions (Lyons,2015). For example, when president Obama was trying to ban immigration, he was trying to tell congress they had to pass it

Read More

More about How The Executive Branch Abuse The Power Of Government

Related Topics

Open Document