ipl-logo

How The Sectionals 'Change In Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange

736 Words3 Pages

Being certain on things is always a good thing to do. But there are times when you can never be certain on something. A good example of this is when throughout the summer our boys cross country team thought we would go to state for sure and we were certain about it. But then the sectionals were posted and that's when we started to be less and less certain. Sectionals came around and we got beat and didn't go to state. This shows it is impossible to be certain about things because certain things can change in an instant. This shows how it is impossible to certain on things which is what happened to Alex in the book A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess the book is about how Alex is caught by the police. After he is caught they perform this experiment …show more content…

But then the sectionals were posted and that's when we started to be less and less certain. Sectionals came around and we got beat and didn't go to state. This shows it is impossible to be certain about things because certain things can change in an instant. This shows how it is impossible to certain on things which is what happened to Alex in the book A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess the book is about how Alex is caught by the police. After he is caught they perform this experiment on him which makes him unable to commit a crime this doesn’t work which shows how it is impossible to be certain. There may be a few problems with the claim for the book A Clockwork Orange By Anthony Burgess that you may not always be certain about things. Now some people may point out problems with that claim since the first thing that people may point out is the fact that Alex does not commit a crime at the end of book this being the strongest argument that can be give. You collect all of this info from what Burgess says on page 71 “ Alex all on his oddy knocky seeking like a mate. And all that …show more content…

The reason you can be certain on things is because of the fact that he doesn’t wanna commit crime which is what the experiment was meant to do. He stops doing all of this and gives up the life of being criminal he wants to be a father which is the something the book says clearly. This does show how the claim might not be right since Alex doesn’t commit crime and it can show how you can be certain about things. The second argument that can be shown is the fact that he starts to show weakness with him committing crime since Alex would always go out all night and commit terrible crimes all of this can be shown from Burgess stating on page 68 “Look, droogies. Listen. Tonight I am somehow just not in the mood. I know not why or how it is, but there it is. You three go your own ways this nightwise, leaving me out”. This can disprove the claim that has been created since It's starting to show that you can be certain things which is the opposite of the claim with the experiment looking like it is beginning to start to take effect on Alex. But here is the problem with this argument the fact that Alex still does commit crime and the claim that is arguement is trying to disproves with it stating how it is impossible to be certain

Show More
Related
476 Words | 2 Pages

In English we are reading a book about a court case called “Monster” by Walter Dean Myers. The book is about a boy fighting for his freedom in court. That boys name is Steve Harmon. Today my job is to convince you that not only is Steve Harmon is not guilty, but he is , completely innocent. My job is to convince you that everything said against him is well within the area of reasonable doubt.

Read More
2496 Words | 10 Pages

He has also been convicted of various finical fraud of millions of dollars. I will be using the Netflix series “Murdaugh Murders: A Sothern Scandal” to help prove why I think Alex killed his family

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

Later in the investigation “His presence at the murder scene was uncovered thanks to a cellphone video taken by his son”. This video was taken by Paul of Alex at the kennels where Paul was shot and killed. This video comes only an hour before Paul was killed and in the video Alex was shown wearing a different shirt then what he was when police showed up. In addition “During his own testimony over two days, Mr. Murdaugh admitted that he was at the dog kennels the night of the murders, after previously telling investigators that he had not been there. Mr. Murdaugh said his lies were triggered by paranoia because of his longtime addiction to painkillers.”

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

When Alex was in middle school that’s when his life and his parents marriage start to go down hill. It all started when Alex dad started spending less and more less time with the family and more time with his work. So, Alex dad didnt really show up to many of Alex football games. Heading

Read More
1414 Words | 6 Pages

Flaws in the Main Argument of The Daughter of Time In The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey, the main character Alan Grant comes to the conclusion that King Richard III did not kill his nephews due to circumstantial evidence. However, many of his arguments, which he seems to think are bulletproof, are actually quite flawed. Most of his case is based on assumptions, rather than hard evidence. In a court, he would not be able to win a case based on assumptions about people and their biases; he would need to present proof that Richard did not kill his nephews, and was not a tyrant.

Read More
1668 Words | 7 Pages

The decision he made to go to Alaska was not a spontaneous one. He had planned his great Alaskan adventure for a 4 months now and he was sharing his thoughts and his preparations about the his trip with the people he met along the way on his journey. It was also revealed in the book that Alex was old prepare for the trip. He did not have enough food to sustain him and this clothes and shoes were not warm enough and we're not waterproof. He also denied help from any other people by not accepting the things they got from the his trip.

Read More
1078 Words | 5 Pages

O’Brien tells how it is difficult to establish was is true from what isn’t true. In the Novel “The Things They

Read More
1879 Words | 8 Pages

Detachment from reality (delusions), paranoia or hallucinations Inability to cope with daily problems or stress Trouble understanding and relating to situations and to people Alcohol or drug abuse Major changes in eating habits, Sex drive changes Excessive anger, hostility or violence Suicidal thinking. I will go back to this list and connect quotes from the book to prove that Alex was having many of these. For my first Scope I will prove and expand on how he segregated himself from society. The second will be that he through away a successful future and years of work. I will conclude with the fact that he lost the ability to judge the ability of himself and his body leading to his death.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

Knight was also not interrogated because, though Officer Davis’ questions related to the crime that Mr. Knight was later charged with, Officer Davis had no information to connect Mr. Knight to Ms. Stone’s murder at the time of the interaction. Just as the defendant in Andrews was not a suspect in any crime despite his suspicious behavior, Mr. Knight was not a suspect in any crime even though Officer Davis thought that “something seemed a bit off” with him. Thus, like the officers in Andrews, who did not know that the defendant had committed a crime and therefore could not know their questions would elicit an incriminating response, Officer Davis similarly did not know Mr. Knight was involved in Ms. Stone’s death and could not know her questions would elicit Mr. Knight’s incriminating statements. Since the Andrews court held that the defendant was not interrogated because his statements were not reasonably foreseeable since he was not a suspect in any crime, the fact that Mr. Knight was also not a suspect in any crime means that he was not interrogated his statements were not reasonably foreseeable. Rather, like the defendant in Andrews who seemingly volunteered information about his possession of child pornography—which officers had not asked about—out of guilt, Mr. Knight also seemed to volunteer his connection with Ms. Stone’s death out of guilt.

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

One of the major things that ties into one of the main topics of my essay is evidence when accusing someone of a crime. In Modern Day America, a person is no longer allowed to accuse someone of a crime without having evidence to prove them guilty. After the events like The Red Scare and The Salem Witch Trials, Modern Day America has learned a lesson on a new way to accept valid accusations, rather than spiritual or dream evidence and McCarthyism. With the new way of accusing people of committing crimes, this will make sure that only the criminal will receive punishment for

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

Like Alex is trying to help Katie but Katie thinks that she doesn’t deserve his affection because she is a person who still has a lot of issues to work through. But since Alex worked as in the Criminal Investigation Division. “He’d been with Criminal Investigation Division, or CID,” (Page 16) He had prior knowledge as to what to expect of victims and how they would react after being out of an abusive

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

He also states that after the murder had happened when someone called the police, the police showed up in two minutes further proving that if someone would have called the police during the first attack instead of just yelling out of their window at the man trying to kill Ms. Genovese she would still be

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

He lives only by obeying to his own rules and the rules of nature but not following the law. Alex lives at his own interest. At one point, he is caught shooting a deer and is caught in between trouble because no Alex actually exists and also that he did not have a hunting license. When he Is finally let go he refuses to go get a hunting license because he believes that the government has authority to know Alex’s business and know what he hunts and what he eats. This goes back to the way that he wats to be free but also free from the entire world.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Reasonable doubt proves that critical thinking is important when someone’s life is in someone else’s hands. “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, is a play about twelve jury members who must deliberate and decide the fate of a man who is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men must unanimously agree on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty without reasonable doubt. Just like the jurors, the readers of this play have not witnessed the crime that took place before the trial started. Everyone, but the writer, is in the dark about who committed the crime.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

From the beginning of the story it is clear that there is a lack of an authority figure in Alex’s life. His parents seem to be emotionally absent, they do not question their sons lack of school attendants, nor do they question where he is and wants he is doing late at night. Alex had a very relaxed upbringing and was allowed to do whatever, whenever with no consequences. The “Droog" gang members also had a negative impact on Alex’s decision making and problem solving abilities. Growing up with this lack of authority and the inability to differ between right and wrong is the ideal environment for the makings of a psychopath.

Read More

More about How The Sectionals 'Change In Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange

Related Topics

Open Document