In a continuously changing world where societal values constantly evolve, the establishment of a Bill of Rights in Australia is both a safeguard and a challenge. This legislation aims to codify fundamental rights, however, it carries the risk of becoming outdated over time due to changing societal norms and expectations. The rigidity of a Bill of Rights indicates that the law may not be able to adapt swiftly to address emerging issues, as these rights are notoriously difficult to repeal or amend. This can lead to inefficiencies in meeting contemporary societal needs, rendering a Bill of Rights as ineffective in fulfilling its intended purpose; protecting individuals rights and freedoms. Thus, achieving a balance between constitutional stability and adaptability remains to be a large concern in the establishment of a Bill of Rights. …show more content…
Society’s values and what they deem as important evolve continuously, and what is considered fundamental rights today may not align with societal norms and expectations in the future. Once a Bill of Rights is established into legislation, it is extremely challenging to remove or amend these rights, and often requires complex and lengthy legal processes. This rigidity means laws may not be able to be adapted to address emerging issues or changing social attitudes. As a result of this, a Bill of Rights, while initially reflecting social needs and expectations, risks becoming outdated and less effective in fulfilling the needs of a modern society. In the debate of the necessity and utility of a Bill of Rights, creating a balance between constitutional protection and adapting to changing circumstances remains a critical