How Was The Indian Removal Act Justified

The Cherokee was were the last to move.

Furthermore, the Cherokee was only treating the Americans the way that the Americans were treating them first. hb

Has the Americans held a grudge against the Cherokee for that long? Vm

The reasons that it was justified, was the fact it got passed by congress.

The Indian removal act of 1830 was justified and the Cherokees should've moved because they did horrible things to people, were given better land, and was given freedom. Vl

Scalping and burning people is a gruesome thing to do. Kl

The Cherokee which is a Native American tribe, is living in Georgia, which is under U.S. law. ty

The first being that the Cherokee has harmed the Americans in the past. kk

Also America can’t be trusted, when

. . hb

Also there were a lot of controversy with the americans and the indians. mjm

The Indians didn’t want to move, had their land taken away, and wasn’t seen as equals are perfect reasons why this act was not justified kn

The only tribe unwilling to pack up their lives and restart were the Cherokee tribe. Kn

Maybe they were just looking out for their tribe and was trying to take advantage. jt If the Cherokee tribe do in fact move off their land, there is a lot of benefits that come with it in large amounts. sgt

Verb Tense

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because they killed, signed a treaty, and getting received extra land plus money. Ry

Many Georgians still had hatred and anger towards the Cherokee tribe because of past events that have occurred. ca

Initially, the reason why the Removal Act was not justified is not everyone signed the treaty. Only some of the chiefs signed the treaty of Etocha. Jak

The Americans did officially buy the land from the French, but the Cherokee was still there first it was just a matter of knowing how to claim land.

Jd

The final reason the Indian Removal Act was justified is that the Cherokee were given a great deal. Kl

They were given options to stay, and if the Indians don’t like it, they can leave. Lf

Cherokees killed people, be given free land and money with better resources, and they would be able to have freedom without having to follow the law since the Indian territory is not part of America. Vl

Based on these reasons, the Indian Removal Act was right because if it didn’t happen, the world wouldn't be what it was today. lk

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not justified because the Cherokee are getting kicked out of their homelands, the Cherokees were treated poorly, and only a few chiefs signed the contract. Gf

Even though the U.S. had tried to grant them lots of land and money, the Native Americans were just too smart to be fooled again with a treaty they know the U.S. would soon break.

There were pros and cons dealing with the Indian Removal Act of 1830, but it was not justified due to the Cherokee not wanting to move, the Americans taking over the land, and the Americans aren't seeing the Cherokee as equals.