Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant was a modern philosophy. He was known for his work in” metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, and aesthetics” (Immanuel Kant, 2016). What Kant argues is the concept of the what we can know. His answer is “our knowledge is constrained to mathematics and the science of the natural, empirical world” (Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics , 2018). He argues that our minds are limited to reality of space and time. We gain knowledge by our limitations of our experiences. Kant argues that blank slate model of the mind is “insufficient to explain the belief about objects that we have; some components of our beliefs must be brought by the mind to experience” (Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics , 2018). This against the arguments …show more content…
Rationalism believe that “supersensible knowledge can be achieved by means of reason” (Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics , 2018). For example, Descartes is believes in the notion of ‘if I am thinking, I exist’. He believes that if this notion is true than it means that we can gain all knowledge of everything. Descartes believes that he could “infer the existence of objects in space outside of him based on his awareness of his own existence” (Immanuel Kant: Metaphysics , 2018). However, Kant’s is against this view of rationalism. Bases on his work in Refutation of Material Idealism, Kant argues that knowledge of outside objects cannot be …show more content…
To answer this question, Kant goes into the explanation of his work on categorical imperative. According to Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy categorical imperative is the “general principle that demands that one respect the humanity in oneself and in others” (Immanuel Kant, 2018). Regarding the topic of Ethics, Immanuel Kant expresses his believes that we should all respect each other and oneself. As a society we need to follow the moral law. Our duty as society is act rationally, with keeping in mind the universal moral law. Opponents of categorical imperative is the aspect that it does not allow for no exceptions to moral laws. Not all situations are the same and sometimes there are some exceptions to the rules. Opponents also argue that Kant contradicts himself. Kant also argues freedom; however, he also states that we must obey the moral laws. Those two principles contradict each other. He says we are free, but we can only be free when we obey the moral laws. The third and last question Kant goes into explaining is the question of: What may I hope? Kant point of view in religion is what answers this question. Immanuel Kant emphasis of hope relies on the notion of faith in religion, meaning the belief in God. According to Stanford Encyclopedia of