ipl-logo

Immigrant Groups That Restrict Individual Rights

736 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discuss multiculturalism britan essay

Of course some people argue that it is impossible to know whether or not the well-being or freedom of an individual is tied up in any way with the flourishing of the culture. The problem with this criticism is that the culture a person is brought up in is part of their unchosen circumstances. But the biggest criticism against multiculturalism deals with granting all minority rights. Some minority rights might enable a group to deny education or health care to children or treat women as second class citizens. As a result defender of multiculturalism have to clearly distinguish the line between minority rights that restrict individual rights and those that supplement individual rights. Kymlicka proposes distinguishing between two kinds of minority …show more content…

Instead of resisting nation building immigrant groups require a more tolerant approach to integration “that would allow and support immigrants to maintain various aspects of their ethnic heritage” (Kymlicka 354). It is necessary to recognize that immigrant groups deserve the same degree of respect, recognition, and accommodation that the majority group has had. Integration is not an overnight process and it is necessary that the policies implemented to integrate immigrants are morally fair. Unlike immigrants, isolationist ethnoreligious groups are unconcerned about their marginalization for the larger society. Rather than desire better integration policies, these groups seek exemption from various laws. This view contradicts with nation building as the purpose of nation building is to integrate citizens into a modern societal culture (Kymlicka 356). However, most democratic states allow these groups to separate from the rest of society but impose internal restrictions so these isolationist groups do not harm people inside the

Show More
Related
1143 Words | 5 Pages

Immigrants faced discrimination from American citizens and had to make a living for themselves, while still trying to fit in. As it is said in the article, ? The Philosophy of Immigration,? ?? the power of absorption possessed by the people of the United States is astonishing?? (The Philosophy of Immigration).

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction Informative, contemplative, and different are three words to describe “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” by Marcelo M. Suárez-Orozco and Carola Suárez-Orozco from Rereading America. “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” talks about unauthorized immigration. More specifically, this source talks about the other side of the issue of unauthorized immigrants; the human face of it all. “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” depicts the monster from one of Jeffrey Jerome Cohen’s thesis in the article, “Monster Culture (7 Theses).” The monster seen in the source “How Immigrants Become ‘Other’” is the one that Cohen talks about in his fourth thesis, “The Monster Dwells at the Gates of Difference.”

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout time diverse regions have considered other societies to be barbaric, causing them to have the desire of “civilizing” them. Likewise, During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the American nativist groups, possessed a similar perspective towards immigration. Nativist’s opposed immigration, as they believed that it would negatively impact the United States socially, morally, politically, and economically. Socially and morally, the nativists feared that foreigners were a threat to the American society, as they were culturally inferior, possessed many ailments, and committed crimes. Politically, the ethnocentric nativists believed that immigrants would corrupt the government and negatively influence American politics.

Read More
1139 Words | 5 Pages

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This famous quote by the novelist and philosopher George Santanya exemplifies the problem this country has with immigrants and foreigners. While the focus of certain immigrant groups has changed, the standards by which foreigners under fire are treated has not changed. That is to say, the peoples being discriminated against may change, but there is always a specific group or groups of people that are treated with prejudice, and continue to be discriminated against even by the government of the country they are in. The Japanese were treated outrageously after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

A major gap has thus developed between portions of our elite and the bulk of our populace over what America is and should be” (Para. #10). Immigrants are tearing Americans apart. Creed, identity, and culture are affecting Americans. The reason is

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

Although there are many forms of nationalism, their goals are relatively similar. All forms of nationalism focus on promoting the best interest of the nation. Our book defines nationalism as “The idea that membership in a nation is the overriding focus of political identity and loyalty, which demands national self-determination (Owens). ” Nationalism can be classified as civic or ethnic and it may also support or oppose existing states. Most assume that civic nationalism is good and ethnic nationalism is bad; although this might not always be the case, in today’s society it seems as though this is true.

Read More
1664 Words | 7 Pages

The common experience of dealing with nativist practices fueled the creation of a “nationally-cohesive Italian ethnic group” that helped both generations overcome subnational divisions. Subnational divisions, as seen in ethnic differences between Sicilian and mainland immigrants, pro-fascist and anti-fascist, as well as religiously Catholic and Protestant, needed consolidation to assimilate into United States society but also to foster unity to resist further white nativist practices. The creation of a cohesive and distinct Italian ethnonational group defies the typical forced American assimilation seen in cases of the Irish and the Jews. This ethnic and national Italian group sought to negate the Immigration Act of 1924 by taking their own course in American assimilation and not backing down to increasing xenophobia. Furthermore, the group insinuated the passive geopolitical resistance by means of populatory force and collective decisions on whiteness and ethnic pride.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

In his essay, Wellman attempts to argue that legitimate states, ones that protect the rights of their citizens, through self determination have the right to close their borders to unwanted immigrants. This extends to the idea that states cannot morally be subjected to include anyone in their community and, concurrently, have the right to exclude any unwanted person. Wellman demonstrates that such states have this right on the basis of freedom of association, his second premise. Wellman’s third premise states that freedom of association includes the right to associate and to disassociate as well. Combined, the three premises Wellman’s provides develop into his argument that any legitimate state can morally refuse to allow immigrants into its territory even if they are in serious need.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

As immigration and relations between races become more influential issues in politics, there have been many opposing views on the treatment of minority groups. Some people believe that diversity and immigration is a threat to original identity while others believe that they are extremely beneficial to society. Writers Samuel P. Huntington in The Hispanic Challenge and Herbert Marcuse in Repressive Tolerance express these differing views regarding these important topics. Huntington takes the ‘threat to identity’ side when explaining how Mexican immigration is extremely different from European immigration. On the other hand, Marcuse takes a different route when explaining the idea of tolerance, claiming that majority groups who oppress the minority

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of nation building there is the need for a strong sense of community, one that supports the state politically and within the context of a national

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

A nation stems from a pre-existing history. It does not require that all the members be alike but they must have a bond of solidarity to the other members of the nation. Nationalism is a movement for the attainment and maintenance of unity, identity and autonomy of a population that its members consider a nation. Nations are a product of modernity but it is likely to find ethnic elements that exist in these nations.

Read More
1396 Words | 6 Pages

As Asim Karim quotes Vertovec (2010) in his article “Multiculturalism”: there has emerged in public discourse across numerous settings- especially in Europe- a broad backlash against multiculturalism. From the political Right many critics now see multiculturalism as a foremost contributor to social breakdown, ethnic tension and the growth of extremism and terrorism (cited in Karim 126). Kymlicka and other theorists of multiculturalism have claimed that antidiscrimination law falls short of treating members of minority groups as equals; because states cannot be neutral with respect to culture. Yet we can find state support for some cultural groups over others in culturally diverse societies. As Jeremy Waldron (1995, 100) argues, “We live in

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

The Terezin concentration camp was part of the holocaust. Holocaust is a word of Greek meaning "sacrifice by fire". The Germans and their associates killed around two out of every three Jews as part of the "final solution". The holocaust is mainly thought of the genocide of 6 million Jewish people during World War 2. Gypsies, physically disabled people and poles were also picked out for demolition for national reasons.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

Thus, the challenge to assimilate or become a part of the European homogeneity will be a difficult task to say the least for immigrants, based on the strategies of supporting a securitization of migration

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

The definition of multiculturalism is when you have cultural diversity within a society. Many people assume that having a multicultural society is a great thing, and in most ways it is. However, with a multicultural society, some problems will occur. In this essay I will debate whether or not a multicultural society is a good thing, and will be pointing out advantages and disadvantages.

Read More

More about Immigrant Groups That Restrict Individual Rights

Related Topics

Open Document