ipl-logo

Importance Of Communication In Alexander The Great's Triumph

162 Words1 Pages
I agree that communication was a very important part of Alexander the Great’s Triumph. If the soldiers did not understand Alexander’s instructions then the battle could have turned into chaos. While I do agree communication was important I think that was only part of a bigger plan. Planning was my assessment of Alexander the Great’s triumph. I think that the planning allowed Alexander to form relationships with his soldiers. Through training, strategic analysis, and planning for the future Alexander was able to win the loyalty of his soldiers. In my research I learned that Alexander the Great led by example. If his soldiers struggled so did he, if his soldiers were hungry so was he through these and other similar acts he was able to win the
Show More
Related
343 Words | 2 Pages

Long ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

The people who were conquered believe that he was brutal and relentless. Based on the information, Alexander was a great military leader and a great king. In the first part of document A, it takes the conquerors perspective of how great Alexander was. It states that he treated some of the rebels with compassion.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

This story truly shows how technical Alexanders strategies were. He found the perfect time and place to go through with his plans making sure he would succeed and he always did. A remarkable leader should be able to get his army out of sticky situation as Alexander did here. Another example of Alexander using his brainpower to succeed is this map that shows the routs he and his army took. It also exhibits the few battles fought by Alexander and the massive amount of territory he gained (Doc A).

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander pouring the water explains why he was great because even though his men had given him water, he refused to drink it, for his men were just as thirsty as he was. Allowing the cities to surrender explains why he was great because it shows that he wasn’t a harsh leader that just seizes control, he lets the city decide to surrender in return for kindness. In conclusion, Alexander the Great was a strong, skilled leader. Alexander the Great did show some qualities of a bad leader.

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

His parents hired the philosopher Aristotle to educate Alexander in subjects such as politics, sports, and warfare. He grew a strong opinion of himself as the outcome of his education. He then concluded to the belief that he was a god. When Alexander’s father died, he inherited his army and his quest to conquer Persia. He successfully lead the army through the Persian Empire and conquered thousands of square miles

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander met his first fierce enemy at the Granicus River, he used tactics like Phalanx and siege warfare to win battles. He and his army travelled around 7000 miles from Macedonia to Egypt and to the Hynapses River in India. Alexander was a genius when it came to war tactics such as when he and his army needed to cross the Hydaspes River without losing many of his troops. So he devised a plan to go up and down the river making noise that sounded like he was preparing for an attack but wouldn’t, but when he finally did attack the enemy had left their guard down making it an easy victory. (Doc A)

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Without their trust, Alexander would not have achieved as much as he did. These examples show that Alexander was great because they provided insight into what Alexander achieved. He had to work hard to gain the people’s trust. It all paid off when he was able to say that he was the greatest leader of his time. Today, everyone wants a trustworthy leader.

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

A good leader should be humble, gracious, and thankful, but Alexander, on the other hand, was egotistical, conceited, and showed almost no gratitude to his

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander was successful as a leader. While being a leader, you have to think of the way others feel and not just your personal needs. “... Alexander with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and in full view of his troops, poured it on the ground”(Document D). The text

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

He was doing an outstanding job, out doing almost everybody . He was undistracted and had no fear which are two keys into having a successful era according Machiavelli. Now discussing Alexander 's campaign, he as well had a swell campaign having an extraordinary run of domination himself. Alexander the Great earned that name for a reason. He was king of Macedonia, subdued Greece, crossed Hellespont against Persia, defeated Darius, then made himself master of Asia, and invaded India.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

In order to galvanize a large army, a leader must primarily be passionate and convinced in himself. These attributes surely describe Alexander the Great adequately. During

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander was fearless of what other leaders could have done to him and his men, he was so fearless he even stood on the front line with his men, unlike today when the leaders sit back in safe zones while their men die for their

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

I focus on the challenge that his father Phillip left him. "Philip and his friends looked on at first in silence and anxiety for the result, till seeing him turn at the end of his career, and come back rejoicing and triumphing for what he had performed, they all burst out into acclamations of applause; and his father shedding tears, it is said, for joy, kissed him as he came down from his horse, and in his transport said, 'O my son, look thee out a kingdom equal to and worthy of thyself, for Macedonia is too little for thee' " (Alex. 6.8.). He was lead to believe that the cause of His life was to be the greatest leader and conqueror of all time. Alexander the Great's legacy is both far reaching and profound.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

it tells of Alexander’s efforts to lead his army and to build his empire. Alexander the great’s military organization from the passages was very diverse and one nation did not get along with the with other nations within the army, Alexander uses the military structure to unite by placing foreign soldiers in army formations with the Greek soldiers, Alexander tried to change the relationship between the Greeks and the Persians by having a big feasts, sharing drinks, and singing with one another. What can we learn about Alexander the Great’s military organization? Alexander’s military organization was very mitch matched in the sense that when he conquered a new nation he would simply add the members of that nation's army to his own, this caused many of the soldiers to become enraged with Alexander. The

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

In a world perplexed by untreatable genetic diseases, gene therapy has the potential to cure and prevent diseases and disabilities by using a method in which scientists alter the DNA in humans or animals. This new discovery in still in its infancy, but through continued research and clinical trials, gene therapy has the ability to save millions of lives. Gene therapy is a method of correcting defective genes by replacing them with a fixed copy (Dedicated). Biochemist and physician Stanfield Roger first introduced this concept in 1970 when he suggested the use of healthy DNA to replace faulty DNA with the goal of curing inherited diseases (History). Following this, Dr. Theodore Friedmann and the scientific director of the Council of Bioethics

Read More

More about Importance Of Communication In Alexander The Great's Triumph

Related Topics

Open Document