ipl-logo

Court Room Analysis

901 Words4 Pages

Just about everything happens in the court room however, it does seem confusing to someone who hasn’t experienced the justice system first hand. In order to conduct hearings efficiently, there is a pre-set order and all proceedings are carried out according to a certain procedure (n.d). All details are pre-deferred such as who stands there, who stands where, who takes the floor when and who are allowed to be in the court room or not allowed (n.d). The room is situated in a way which is abide by these rules for proper organization in the court room. It includes separate circulation patterns for the public, prisoner and jury member, special attention to acoustic and lighting levels. Often the court will usually explain why the rule is being created …show more content…

The judge in the court room is to overlook proceedings from the bench and have certain tasks to ensure the trial process and ensure justice. The judge has to determine whether any evidence that the parties want to use is either improper or illegal. Before the deliberations begin, the judge gives instructions to the jury about standards deciding in the case. Finally, the judge will impose a sentence of the convicted defendant if found guilty (2015, July 24). The lawyer’s role is to contribute to speak to the judge, the witness and the jury. Each task of the lawyer is to intervene the facts that has been put on their client’s case by using legal procedures. The duty for the lawyer is to represent the accused of committing crime and question the witness by cross examining the state. The lawyer is seated facing the judge and is in front of the spectators who are seated behind (2015, July 24). The jury’s part is to decide the facts in the case to apply the law in order to reach a verdict. The jurors are group of people to decide the law in the case. Jurors are expected to be unbiased and free of pre-accept approach about guilt or innocence. The group are seated in a boxed-area on one side of the court room (2015, July 24). The court reporter sits near the witness stand in the court room and records everything that is said during the trial on a type writing machine. This information become that official record of the trial. The witness gives the testimony about the facts in the case. During the testimony, they sit or stand on the witness stand facing the court room. The witness gets asked questions about the case by one or the other party which they are asked to

Show More
Related

What Is R V Lopez Case Brief

1757 Words | 8 Pages

Role of the Courts Firstly, the coroner’s court investigated the deaths of the accused’s family. The case was then heard in the local court. Due to the fact that the case was an indictable offence, the local court could not finalise the verdict. Therefore, the local court conducted a committal hearing, where the magistrate was to determine whether the prosecution evidence is capable of satisfying a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused committed the offence.

Read More

Murder Of Vanessa Pham By Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia

1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More

Rachel Jeantel: The Trayvon Martin Case

252 Words | 2 Pages

The witness impacts the jury decision on many cases because the way they are. In the Trayvon Martin case Rachel Jeantel, the witness seemed like an illiterate hood person. The witness was on the stand for a couple hours. The defense would question her and agitate her to prove the jury that Mr. Martin was a hoodlum.

Read More

First-Degree Murder Of Travis Alexander's Home In Mesa, Arizona

887 Words | 4 Pages

To do this, they used various pieces of evidence and testimonies to convince the jury of their argument. The jury then decided whether or not Arias was guilty based on the claims of counsels, defense and prosecution. The judge was there to maintain order in the courtroom, negotiate between the counsels, and decide guilt, known as administrator, negotiator, and adjudicator respectively. Once Arias was convicted, the role then moves to correction. They are responsible for enforcing the punishment and incarceration that she was sentenced to.

Read More

Jury System DBQ Essay

515 Words | 3 Pages

Jurors should not know anything about a specific case and not follow public affairs and read the news (Doc F). When a person is selected to be part of a jury, they have to say an oath stating that they will not use their emotions to determine the verdict of a trial. If a juror is caught using their emotions, they will be fined for a crime called perjury. Since there are twelve people in a jury, there is a variation of opinions when the jury decides a verdict. But, a judge is more professional and knows how to only use the evidence provided and be less biased.

Read More

Explain Why The Provincial Government Can Combine Two Adjacent Provinces

692 Words | 3 Pages

The parties decide what evidence to present, what witnesses to call, and how to question them. The judge is to be a neutral during the process and uphold the principles of fairness and equality, although he does make determinations of fact and law. The adversarial system is usually found in places with a common law system. In an inquisitorial hearing, the judge has a more prominent and active role in regards to evidence and questioning the witnesses. The inquisitorial system is typically found in places with a civil law system.

Read More

Compare And Contrast State Of Florida Vs Anthony

1063 Words | 5 Pages

In a criminal case, first the jury is selected, followed by a preliminary hearing where it is decided if there is enough evidence for the case to be brought up in the court of law, then an arraignment occurs where the defendant pleads guilty, not guilty, or no contest. After this, the plea hearing begins where the defendant can make an agreement with the prosecutor to make a plea bargain, which is pleading guilty to a less serious crime and giving up the right to a speedy public trial to avoid risk conviction of greater penalty for a more serious crime, after which the trail starts. During the trial, opening statements are given, evidence is presented, examination and cross-examination of witnesses take place, followed by closing statements. Once the trial is finished the judge instructs the jury and they leave to deliberate. The jury returns with their verdict only if the decision is unanimous, if it isn’t the judge orders a mistrial where the trial is called off completely or a new jury is selected.

Read More

Juror 3 Character Analysis Essay

980 Words | 4 Pages

Foreman (Juror 1): He is an assistant football coach at a High School. Elected as the foreman of the jury, he has the responsibility to keep the jury process organized. Although he is not particularly bright, he is dogged. Initially, he struggled to keep up with his authority. Eventually, he managed to weight to his authority as the foreman as well as his opinions.

Read More

Tom Robinson: Would He Be Guilty Today?

900 Words | 4 Pages

The defendant gets read and explained to about their charge. If the defendant calls for a lawyer, the judge establishes one. The people in the courtroom, like witnesses try to provide evidence to support the side they are on. (How court works). People question if blacks are discriminated in courts like they were in the 1930’s, but our court systems today are way different and more fair now.

Read More

The Ethical Role Of A Defense Attorney

169 Words | 1 Pages

A defense attorney represents the accused from arrest to final appeal. An individual accused of a crime has a constitutional right to counsel during every stage in the criminal process. Defense attorneys represent their clients before trial starting from arrest and through interrogation, lineup, and arraignment. They may negotiate a plea bargain with the prosecutor to avert a trial or defend their client at trial. Defense attorneys provide assistance at sentencing and appeal if the accused is convicted.

Read More

Judge Dbq Essay

776 Words | 4 Pages

With a jury that cares about everything but the trial, how is the defendant suppose to be given a fair trial? He isn’t. The last piece of evidence is cartoon 3, where a dog is being judged by his natural enemies, feline (Document E). These ‘jurors’ all hate the dog and no matter what the evidence is, the dog will be guilty. It applies to our system with the notion that a suspect is hated by jurors because the media accuses them of being guilty before the trial begins.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

628 Words | 3 Pages

The defense attorney communicates with defendant about plea-bargaining, and assistance the defendant receives the correct plea-bargaining. The prosecutor is an individual who represents the government in a criminal or civil

Read More

Anatomy Of A Jury By Seymour Wishman

891 Words | 4 Pages

The initial twelve jurors are chosen at random by the county clerk, who picks slips of paper with the perspective jurors’ names at random. Once the twelve jurors are selected, the lawyers begin the process of molding the jury to whom they specifically want. In Anatomy of a Jury, the defense attorney, Mike Bernstein, and the prosecutor, Leslie Ryan, begin this process, which is called Voir-Dire. Here, the lawyers can ask the selected jury any question they desire to try and untangle whether jurors will find the defendant guilty or not guilty. Some Lawyers even bring in social scientists to help them figure out which way jurors will lean.

Read More

Courtroom Workgroup Case Study

672 Words | 3 Pages

The differing personalities between the two courts has an impact on the courtroom workgroup ethic. Both proceedings displayed the effectiveness of the workgroups and how each interacts differently. In felony courts, “court actors” improve the effectiveness of the courtroom. Attorneys and judges that work with each other on a regular basis foster improved relations. As a result, cases have a higher probability of resulting in a plea and the length of disposition is decreased (Metcalfe 2016).

Read More

The Race Card Chapter 4 Summary

282 Words | 2 Pages

In chapter 4, Consulting and Testifying it explain how psychologists are needed in the courtroom in order to consult or testify with lawyers to the judicial process. The series of American Story Crime episode 5: “The Race Card”, there were examples and concepts of the structure and process in criminal and civil court with the legal system. While reading chapter 4, I learned that there are four stages of the judicial process which are pretrial, trail, disposition and appeals. Before heading to the court, preparation was done to assists the attorney during the trial by preparing the witnesses and making decisions about particular trail stages. During the opening statement, it included a judge and the jury in the room to hear from both lawyers

Read More

More about Court Room Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document