1. What does 'justice' mean in terms of the Australian Legal System? Justice is fairness, it's the process of protecting rights and to fairly judge and punish wrongs and giving every individual their due rights from the system. This includes all rights, natural right and legal rights.
Just Mercy written by Bryan Stevenson, he had a decade long career as a legal advocate for marginalizing people who have been either falsely convicted or harshly sentenced. Even though the book contains profiles of many different people, the central storyline that the relationship has between Stevenson, the organization he founded and Walter McMillian, a black man that was wrongfully accused of murder and was sentenced to death in Alabama in the late 1980’s. In the book, Stevenson provides a historical context, as well as his own moral and philosophical reflections on the American criminal justice and prison systems. Ultimately he argues that the society should choose empathy and mercy over the condemnation and punishment.
Justice is a good virtue because it gives people control on what they follow regarding in the manner of law. Courage as a virtue, allows people to achieve gaat thing in risky situations. Forensic speakers look into “wrong doing” and have determined what are the cause of the crimes and have separated them into two categories, “involuntary” and “voluntary”. Involuntary is composed of three things chance, nature, and compulsion. Voluntary is composed of habit, reasoning, anger, and appetite.
The United States is a country which every day is as much as changes in their justice systems, as in the constitution in order to defend the rights of citizens and improve as a country. Is America a country completely free of injustice, discrimination and respect for the rights of citizens ?. There are two things related to the improvement and stability of the country. According to Obama's Speech he was trying to make many changes and implement new laws for equality of all people as well as a fair justice system for all citizens regardless of race. In his speech the appeal rhetorical most used was Logos, after pathos and finally ethos.
Inherently, not all people have the capability to live morally upright lives. Virtues are learned traits, and while a person may have a good disposition, his choices, which he makes based on learned information, affect the kind of life he lives. Therefore, there are just people and unjust people, as there are just actions and unjust actions. The ancient philosopher Aristotle wrote about an ideal city called “The Polis,” in which citizens lived a certain way in order to achieve a common good. Although Aristotle believed that everyone should live the good life (one of happiness), he also believed that in order to achieve the good life, people should get what they deserved, even if it meant injustice was a necessary consequence for some.
Responsibility and Justice leave people accountable for their actions and leave them with consequences that result from their actions. In the novel Into Thin Air, by Jon Krakauer, the book talks about Krakauer’s journey up Mount Everest and what he encountered on the way up. He had many responsibilities, as did the other guides and clients. Their first priority was to be safe and complete the hike up the mountain. Although not everyone was able to make it to the top, the people that did receive justice in the end.
Justice is the legal or philosophical theory by which fairness is administered. Concepts of justice may differ based on your society 's practices, beliefs, and feelings. According to Michael Sandel, in his book, Justice: What 's the Right Thing to Do, an important concept of implementing justice is giving all individuals what they deserve. The difficulty of this concept is settling who deserves what and why. Kreon left Polyneices unburied and sent Antigone away to die alone, merely because it is what the two deserved.
Every moment in our life we must make decisions – some of lesser or of greater importance. For many of these decisions, personal ethics and our moral code are involved. However, sometimes what distinguishes something to be moral or not is subjective, or not clear-cut. A good example of this is the hypothetical trolley scenarios. The Switch and Footbridge versions of the trolley problem are different but both present the choice to save five people and kill one, or kill five people and save one.
An Evaluation of the Restorative Justice Model In Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology, Karmen (2015) outlines the restorative justice model of confronting perpetrators of criminal acts. Restorative justice is an alternative to the more traditional legal system of retributive justice; this model strives to increase communication between victim and offender and moves the focus away from offender punishment or other state-centered actions (Karmen, 2015). The restorative justice model has several benefits, including a greater level of focus on crime victims and an emphasis on making peace after a criminal event, such that an offender may reintegrate into society at large (Karmen, 2015). Restorative justice also allows for crime victims
Retributive Justice is flawed in many ways, and while the intent may be well rounded, the process of implementing such a system is far stretched and not ideal. A better system of criminal justice is much more restitution theory focused. The idea of punishment in the retributive view is to cause more harm to someone than serve justice to the victim. Our criminal justice system has a need to serve justice, not punish and provide entertainment. Punishment is simply not a logical answer to everything our legal systems face, and restitution can be a much easier process.
Race has always been America’s deepest dilemma. As long as racism is in the criminal justice we the people would never be equal. One out of every four African Americans are expected to end up behind bars. With evidence for proof and cases after cases African Americans are still fighting to be heard. They been fighting to be heard for years and is still being overpowered by the criminal justice system.
In general, growing up in a community where in justice is order of the day, identity has a role to play. At times people stigmatize you as a result of your identity not minding, you cannot judge a book by its cover. Furthermore, the minorities are mistreated as a matter of their colors. Nevertheless, “Stevenson” listened to his grandmother on the issues of not drinking alcohol; therefore, he grew up to be an advocate for justice. On the other hand, there are something’s which could cause people to fall victims of justice, by not following parental instruction.
Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).
4 Criticism and Challenges The first point of criticism against victim participation in restorative justice processes arises from scepticism about an apology to the victim as a way of dealing with criminal matters. The perception sometimes exists as to it simply being a way to get away with the crime.106 Members of the public should thus be educated to understand that restorative justice is more than a mere saying sorry, but in the context of victim offender mediation or family group conferences it rather affords the victim the opportunity to confront the child offender with the real and human cost of his or her criminal actions. Another concern deals with the possible secondary victimisation of the victim in the case where the offender pretends
Definition and Description of Procedural Justice Procedural justice is the act involved in decision making. It incorporates the process of involving transparency and fairness in making decisions. The incorporation of justice in this process is equally essential it entails that all parties allowed to give their views before decision are made concerning a given matter. Some theories state that restorative and distributive justice might not be met but for as long as there is a fair and justice procedure, there is always the possibility of having outcomes that are equitable (Jason &Tyler, 2003).
